Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/30/2008 4:50:01 PM EDT
After a lot of debate I have pretty well settled on the 1911 platform for my next handgun. I plan to use it for CCW. I have looked at the Springfield Ultra-Compact and the kimber equivelents. From my research I see that there are often feeding issues with the 3 inch 1911s. What your guys experiences with these? Would anyone have a suggestion as the best brand and maybe a specific model that would be a reliable and concealable piece?

As a side note I read at article my Ayoob reviewing the Springfield Ultra-Compacts and his findings suggested these feeding issues can often be solved by switching to Colt factory or Wilson combat mags. What are your guys takes on this?
12/30/2008 4:56:15 PM EDT
[#1]
I've read the same reports of the 3 inch 1911s having issues. I had a Ultra Raptor and it ran flawlessly for 6 or 700 rounds before it went in on trade of one of my Nighthawks. The only 3in 1911 I'd think about now is the SIS Ultra. As far as I know it's one of the few steel 1911s in the 3in range. I think the rest of Kimber ultra line are all alloy guns. I did find that 230 grain rounds were snappy in a alloy gun with that short of a barrel.
I don't know if the Springfields are steel or alloy.  My smallest 1911 now is a commander size bobtail Nighthawk, but I'm on the larger end of the scale body wise, so I don't have any concealment issues with even a 5 in 1911.

My suggestion would be find someone who had one that would let you shoot it and see if the snappy recoil with the alloys is a concern for you and try one for yourself.
12/30/2008 5:03:59 PM EDT
[#2]
Read Me.
12/30/2008 9:41:24 PM EDT
[#3]
Colt..
12/30/2008 11:32:09 PM EDT
[#4]
the smaller a 1911 (or just about any auto), the higher the chances of mechanical/reliablity probs you MAY have (some have very reliable short guns)

personally: the smallest 1911 i'd opt for is the commander length slide...i'd look to one w/ the officer sized grip if concealment is a biggie as the grip length will have a more determining bearing on concealment vs the bbl/slide length

as to ayoob, the man has a LOT of expierence and i respect his writings and opinions....but, at the same time, never take anything from a gun rag (or internet) without a grain of salt b/c one of thier main promo points for reviews of various items IS as an advertisment
12/31/2008 10:03:08 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Colt..


PFFT.. Detonics Combatmaster.
12/31/2008 3:41:59 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
After a lot of debate I have pretty well settled on the 1911 platform for my next handgun. I plan to use it for CCW. I have looked at the Springfield Ultra-Compact and the kimber equivelents. From my research I see that there are often feeding issues with the 3 inch 1911s. What your guys experiences with these? Would anyone have a suggestion as the best brand and maybe a specific model that would be a reliable and concealable piece?

As a side note I read at article my Ayoob reviewing the Springfield Ultra-Compacts and his findings suggested these feeding issues can often be solved by switching to Colt factory or Wilson combat mags. What are your guys takes on this?


I have one of these. I've only put maybe 200 rds through it, but so far, so good.
12/31/2008 4:25:53 PM EDT
[#7]
I have a Colt officer's model with the King's recoil spring kit and it eats anything I put in the mags.  I use Colt and Pachmayr mags.
12/31/2008 6:27:39 PM EDT
[#8]
Never had a problem with my Kimber Ultra that couldn't be traced to ammo. (when ammo fails in 4 guns you KNOW its the ammo)

Always use Wilson Combat mags.
12/31/2008 7:59:35 PM EDT
[#9]
DO NOT GET A KIMBER ULTRA CARRY II. I repeat DO NOT GET A KIMBER ULTRA CARRY II. Mine sucked big time. I finally got rid of it after 500 rounds. It had at least one FTF or FTE every magazine. Tried a bunch of mags and a bunch of ammo. None of it was any better than the other. I finally got a Glock. Problem solved.