Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/7/2007 7:18:11 AM EDT
I am thinking about buying a 1911, and i was looking at the Taurus. I was wondering what you guys have to say about it.
2/7/2007 8:27:39 AM EDT
[#1]
i don't own a .45, one is on my wishlist though.
i have handled most of them at the shows.  
i like the taurus as well as any for fit,  finish, and features.
i think they have a lifetime warrenty on their guns as well.
good luck.
2/7/2007 9:46:21 AM EDT
[#2]
try a search--several recent topics on em...

www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=39813
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=39736
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=39352
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=36636
www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=5&f=49&t=38879

i got one a month ago--a little over 100rnds through it, 0 problems from several diff brands of mags

fit and finish is pretty tight, but not on par w/ other brands like SA or kimber; h/w, the bluing does wear off pretty easily and the machining on the PT1911 i got was a little rough on some areas (such as the FSC lines)

i changed out that crappy, ugly hammer, threw it and the keys away, and replaced it w/ a WC commander hammer--works fine

the henie sights are pretty nice, but i wish they were nights...but they work great

the best feature on my PT1911 was the trigger pull; while the trigger phyisically had play, the break and pull is VERY nice and crisp (almost, if not as good as my kimber TLE)

overally, the PT1911, disregarding the MIM parts, cruddy hammer, is a great 1911 for the money

the general consensus on these is: they are great 1911s for the money, w/ the custom features that others charge a lot more for....h/w, its long term and high round count vs parts breakage/failure has yet to be determined readily since its still kinda new....
2/7/2007 10:14:17 AM EDT
[#3]
I don't yet own one, but plan to.

My local shop simply cannot keep them on the shelves. They haven't had one report of a problem, either.
2/8/2007 7:50:50 AM EDT
[#4]
Regarding durability and mim parts.  It is my understanding that Taurus actually manufactures the internals for the Springfield/Imbel guns.  There should be no difference.  

This is a Plus 1 here.  I like mine and intend to give my Colt a rest and put this one on my duty belt.
2/8/2007 11:40:10 AM EDT
[#5]
I thought it was the other way around.

IMBEL being the main Manufacturer in Brazil for a LONG time (before Taurus, I think?) I thought it was IMBEL (makers of fine FAL Rifles) that made 1911 parts for BOTH Taurus & Springfield.  Not Taurus making them for Both IMBEL & Springfield.

I may be wrong but I don't know HOW Taurus magically got contract to build for IMBEL unless they bought out IMBEL completely.  Who knows.  I just know that IMBEL has been around for a loooooong time so that's where I'm not sure of the info.

Are ALL Taurus guns made in Brazil?
2/8/2007 11:43:56 AM EDT
[#6]
I was under the impression that Taurus is Imbel's American brand.
2/8/2007 12:48:19 PM EDT
[#7]
Taurus is a megagiant by the standards of the firearms industry.  They employ 2500 people.  The mim technology and production is owned by Taurus.  Guns are made in Brazil.  Guns for military and police are final assembled in the US to meet contract requirements.

I suppose its possible that Imbel is making some components and Taurus others and they are cross selling.  I'm not sure how though they are related.
2/9/2007 3:03:16 AM EDT
[#8]
Buy one now...........hell, buy two. They arent getting any cheaper since they are getting so popular.

I am about to buy another as soon as the stainlees comes out, and also buying the commander model even.


Using the micrometer, the only thing out of spec, well not tight was the barrel bushing. 10 thousandths off, 5 inside and 5 outside.......not a problem at all, but could be tighter for accuracy.
Bought a Ed Brown over-under sized bushing, machined it to fit perfectly, cleared it up.