I'm trying to decide between these two. One of my local gun shops has them both in stock for about $1050.
Any comments from owners? Or should I just forget them both and pick up an AR-10A2?
thanks
Posted: 5/11/2002 3:40:08 PM EDT
[#1]
I vote for AR10A2 without a doubt.
Posted: 5/11/2002 4:29:56 PM EDT
[#2]
Well, the AR102 is about $100 cheaper... but I'd have to find mags :(
Besides, the pistols will probably be getting shot more often.
Posted: 5/11/2002 5:58:31 PM EDT
[#3]
Ken: IMO, an ar-10a2 for less than $1000 is a good deal! ZT
Posted: 5/11/2002 7:43:32 PM EDT
[#4]
I'd get the Springfield.
Posted: 5/12/2002 12:22:19 AM EDT
[#5]
I kind of like the Wilson
Posted: 5/12/2002 6:38:34 AM EDT
[#6]
HK USP Tactical .45
Posted: 5/12/2002 6:39:55 AM EDT
[#7]
just remember if you wilson you'll wince and go DAMMIT!!!! you drop the HK you pick it up and say... ah well jus a little scratch and slap a mag in it and start blastin but if i had to pick i'd get the WC
Posted: 5/12/2002 7:59:54 AM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:HK USP Tactical .45
Been there, done that, sold it. I find I like 1911's more.
Since I don't have any really tricked out 1911's, at this point I am heavily leaning towards the TRP in stainless.
without a doubt.