Posted: 6/20/2011 11:20:31 AM EDT
|
sig 220 carry, or the Smith and wesson M&P 45 compact
tell me why |
Well I will not allow myself to advice you what to buy but in my case I will go with M&P. I really dont like where the barrels is placed in sig pistols. too high for me. I always didnt like the finish on sig pistols, it goes away very fast. Sigs are fine pistols but they are pistols from past. MP offers more advantage: better ergonomics, high-end finish, low barrel, interchangible grip panels, simple maintenance. I also like the design and looks of the MP pistols. So I opt for M&P 
people may disagree with me but this is my personal opinion. Also if you and your wife plan to use same pistol, interchangible grip panels may be a good option if size of your hands is different. |
|
Quoted:
Well I will not allow myself to advice you what to buy but in my case I will go with M&P. I really dont like where the barrels is placed in sig pistols. too high for me. I always didnt like the finish on sig pistols, it goes away very fast. Sigs are fine pistols but they are pistols from past. MP offers more advantage: better ergonomics, high-end finish, low barrel, interchangible grip panels, simple maintenance. I also like the design and looks of the MP pistols. So I opt for M&P
people may disagree with me but this is my personal opinion. Also if you and your wife plan to use same pistol, interchangible grip panels may be a good option if size of your hands is different. +1 |