Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
10/15/2009 7:17:28 AM EDT
I am thinking about purchasing a S&W 442, anyone have one? If so, what do you like or dislike about it.

(I have a chance to pick one up for just over 300 )

Thanks,

Mac
10/15/2009 7:25:33 AM EDT
[#1]
Really nothing to dislike about it.
10/15/2009 7:49:33 AM EDT
[#2]
I have a 642. Basically the same but lighter.

Works great, accurate. However, I thought I was going to carry this and ended up settling on my Colt Lightning 380. 3 more shots and it just carries better, being slimmer.
10/15/2009 8:24:07 AM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
I have a 642. Basically the same but lighter.





A 642 and a 442 weigh exactly the same.  The only difference is their finish.
10/15/2009 9:24:29 AM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
I have a 642. Basically the same but lighter.

Works great, accurate. However, I thought I was going to carry this and ended up settling on my Colt Lightning 380. 3 more shots and it just carries better, being slimmer.


Do you carry it in your pocket?

OP, I find that my 442 is an exceptional little firearm that permits me to carry a gun in clothing or situations that would otherwise mitigate against being armed.  I recommend that you get the 642 (if you can), and that you purchase a Kramer pocket holster.

The only real, functional improvement you can make to a 442/642 is to have a tritium dot front sight installed or to put on a set of CT laser grips.  This is all said with the understanding that this gun is only truly useful w/in 7 yards.
10/15/2009 10:09:10 AM EDT
[#5]
From some quite extensive research I've done on the internets, I've found no complaints against this pistol.  The only reason I don't have one is because I don't have the $$$ to buy a new gun right now.  The older ones without the crazy integral gun lock will be in high demand soon.  I believe all the new ones have the integral gun lock, which is not a desirable feature.
10/15/2009 10:14:27 AM EDT
[#6]
Great BUG. Been carrying one since 1997. Other carry guns have come and gone but the 442 is a keeper.



Try to find a prelock though.
10/15/2009 5:54:31 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
From some quite extensive research I've done on the internets, I've found no complaints against this pistol.  The only reason I don't have one is because I don't have the $$$ to buy a new gun right now.  The older ones without the crazy integral gun lock will be in high demand soon.  I believe all the new ones have the integral gun lock, which is not a desirable feature.


S&W offers a "non-lock" 442.  It's on their site:

S&W Model 442 - No Internal Lock

This is one of the guns on "the list" for me.  I have shot the 642 a few times and it is everything I'd expect from a compact revolver.  Plenty accurate at short distances (~ 7 yards), decent trigger pull, and fairly reasonable recoil with +P loads.
10/15/2009 6:12:16 PM EDT
[#8]
You can't go wrong with a 442.  I find mine very easy to conceal in a front pocket.  Plan on the extra $240 for laser sights.  Plan on an in the pocket holster (DeSantis is good enough for me).  Don't worry about the lock.
10/15/2009 6:31:16 PM EDT
[#9]
I bought my wife a S&W 442 four years ago. great little close range weapon. At 7 yards you can definately hit what you are shooting. I would like to fit it with crimson trace grips
10/17/2009 12:19:36 PM EDT
[#10]
I've noticed the non-lock versions drop of galleryofguns.com site.  They only have internal lock models now.  I figured this was an indication that smith was putting the internal lock on all their new revolvers.
10/17/2009 4:22:56 PM EDT
[#11]
RSR has about 100 no lock 442's and 642's in stock.  I just ordrered one.  I'm not sure if they are a special run, or will be offered from now on.  I'm guessing that since it is on the S&W website, that it may be a permanent offering.

Either way, get them before the price goes up another $60.00.  Wholesale jumped from $330 to $390 over the past year or two.
10/17/2009 8:17:29 PM EDT
[#12]
I was given a 442 as a graduation gift from an academy. Through the years it has been a great gun. They are hard as hell to shoot really well. The Crimson Trace grips are a massive improvement in low light and I consider them essential for a snubby. Really the little J frames take a substantial amount of training to maximize their potential. I bought my wife one as well and she carries it everywhere with her.

To be honest, neither of us practice with our snubbies as much as we should. No excuses, that is just the way it is.

Overall, the 442 is a "must have" backup gun for anyone who carries a gun for a living. I do not consider it a primary gun, though in some social situations that would not lend themselves to carrying a more effective gun, my 442 in a pocket or an ankle rig is comforting.
10/18/2009 4:32:56 AM EDT
[#13]
I have a 642 that I have had for 8-9 years.  I have been thinking about getting a second snub either a no lock 642, no lock 442 or ruger LCR.
Does anybody have rust develope on your 442s?  My 642 has alot of alum. frame finish wear.  I have saw reported somewhere that 442 wear better?
I guess cylinder is where rust could form, as it is blued steel.  
RRA15
10/18/2009 4:35:42 AM EDT
[#14]
I have had a 442 for a few years. Great BUG. I have no complaints other than the ILS. Whats the going rate for the new ones without the ILS? I might offer to sell my brother (who is currently borrowing mine) the ILS model and pick up a no lock version.
10/19/2009 10:22:54 AM EDT
[#15]
I have one of the newer no-lock 442s.  It's great, but I wish they made the bodyguard style snubbies in no-lock configuration as well.  I think they ride in the pocket better.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
10/19/2009 11:34:22 AM EDT
[#16]
What's the best place to pick up a 442?
10/19/2009 10:15:07 PM EDT
[#17]
That's a good price, I carried one in my right front pocket for a years.   The cylinder rubs the leg and so does the speed loader in the left pocket.

The 442 is very easy to hit with in fast point shooting at self defense distances.  It is an excellent defense weapon.

I pocket carry an LCP now with an extra magazine on the other side.  The LCP draws much, much faster and more positively than the 442.  It's a big difference.  The LCP hits just as good as the 442 after you get used to the different grip angle and narrower width.  The LCP is easier to hit with at distance.  The LCP reloads more positively and faster than the 442.

Both work well with reloads, I use a 105 gr SWC cast from a Lee mold and 231 powder in both the .38 Spl and .380.  

If I found a no-lock 442 for 300 bux I'd probably buy it.
10/22/2009 12:09:42 PM EDT
[#18]
Quoted:
That's a good price, I carried one in my right front pocket for a years.   The cylinder rubs the leg and so does the speed loader in the left pocket.

The 442 is very easy to hit with in fast point shooting at self defense distances.  It is an excellent defense weapon.

I pocket carry an LCP now with an extra magazine on the other side.  The LCP draws much, much faster and more positively than the 442.  It's a big difference.  The LCP hits just as good as the 442 after you get used to the different grip angle and narrower width.  The LCP is easier to hit with at distance.  The LCP reloads more positively and faster than the 442.

Both work well with reloads, I use a 105 gr SWC cast from a Lee mold and 231 powder in both the .38 Spl and .380.  

If I found a no-lock 442 for 300 bux I'd probably buy it.


I'd buy it in a heartbeat.
10/22/2009 6:21:59 PM EDT
[#19]
I have a 342PD 38spl, it has an Al frame and a Ti cylinder. It is 4oz ligther than the 442/642, to shoot anything extensively other than wadcutter is brutal. But it is a nice gun.
10/30/2009 7:29:42 AM EDT
[#20]
I have an Airlite 337 and 342.  Fine guns.  I don't think the recoil is that brutal even with Winchester 125 +p rounds and I'm no brute.  Recoil should be manageable in a 15oz gun like the 442/642
11/1/2009 7:37:02 AM EDT
[#21]
With some difficulty, I passed yesterday at the gun show on a 4" with adjustable sights and 3 NIB 12rd mags in addition to the 10rd mag it came with, for $300. That's like $225 for the gun and $25/mag. I'm feeling worse by the minute, but I already have 2 6" 422s and a 6" 2206. HotRod 9MM makes an adapter that replaces the barrel nut for mounting a suppressor.
Great gun.
11/1/2009 8:03:35 AM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
With some difficulty, I passed yesterday at the gun show on a 4" with adjustable sights and 3 NIB 12rd mags in addition to the 10rd mag it came with, for $300. That's like $225 for the gun and $25/mag. I'm feeling worse by the minute, but I already have 2 6" 422s and a 6" 2206. HotRod 9MM makes an adapter that replaces the barrel nut for mounting a suppressor.
Great gun.


I think you are talking about the wrong gun.
11/2/2009 5:15:38 PM EDT
[#23]
I bought the wife a 442 last Dec. for a graduation present. She carries it daily in her purse and loves the weight compared to her Glock 26. It has a bit of a stiff pull but for about $8 Wolfe springs make it quite decent. She actually preferred the heavy pull for some reason, so I get to put the stock springs back in. She is a great shot with it. She was hitting 18" x 24" steel at 50 yards consistanly 3 out of 5 rounds with home loaded wad cutters. I would love to have one myslef for CC but the Ruger LCR sure is sexier. I gave $430 from Academy then had a S&W $30 rebate. $400 was a fair price in my opinion. It has the lock, but I see no reason to wory about it. Oh yeah. The distance from cylinder to frame makes it a tight fit for speed loaders. The load strip that someone had in their pic above looks like a good idea.
11/8/2009 10:25:39 AM EDT
[#24]
I bought a no lock 442 back in June of this year as I have faith that one day I will be legally able to carry it, here or in another state.

I paid $440 for it. ILS models were a bit cheaper.

Nice little gun. I would have never even considered purchasing it if it had the drilled in Klinton lock. There are many no lock versions of the 442/642 out there. One just has to maintain the motivation to look for them.

I like the fact that it is lightweight, ability to shoot +Ps and is has an internal hammer. This is a far cry from the beautiful 1957 manufactured S&W Md. 36 my Dad gave me when I turned 21.
11/8/2009 11:28:58 AM EDT
[#25]
The 442/642 are great little revolvers, but get someone to show you how to clip the rebound slide spring.  This can turn a 28 pound "lawyer-proof" trigger pull in to a reasonable 10-12 pound pull.

Light, powerful, dependable, affordable.....hard to beat for a carry gun.

BTW, the Desantis "Nemesis" is a great little pocket holster.  ALWAYS use a pocket holster when pocket carrying...to cover the trigger guard, stabilize the gun for a consistent presentation, and to keep crap out of the gun.
12/6/2009 4:52:54 PM EDT
[#26]
I love my 442. I just bought another one for my daughter in Grad school. The long drives home worried us with her having not having a way to protect herself other than a cell phone.

She loves it and is taking the CCW training with my wife next  weekend.

I also have a Ruger LCR and also love it but it kicks a little more compared to the 442. I suppose due to it's configuration.
12/8/2009 7:24:40 PM EDT
[#27]
My wife has been carrying a S&W 442 for a number of years. She has Crimson Trace Grips on it. It is her favorite carry piece.
12/12/2009 8:52:30 PM EDT
[#28]
I love mine , But then I love J frames.
12/13/2009 8:28:52 AM EDT
[#29]
I've had a 442 for about 2 yrs & love it
Mater of fact i just ordered a set of Crimson Trace LG 105 grips for it

12/13/2009 12:23:00 PM EDT
[#30]




I love mine, great little gun.  

Here's a pic of two of my carry guns, the 442 next to my Sig P238 right after I bought it.
12/13/2009 12:56:10 PM EDT
[#31]
Perfect carry gun.  Mine has become my "Everywhere" gun.

12/13/2009 1:58:32 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
Perfect carry gun.  Mine has become my "Everywhere" gun.



Same with mine-
Sometimes i forget its on me
12/13/2009 5:12:19 PM EDT
[#33]
I really like the 442, it's my favorite of several J frames. It's the one I carry all the time. Most people don't like rubber grips, but that is one of the things I am partial too in my snubs.