Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
8/1/2006 6:01:41 PM EDT
I know this forum will probably be biased but here goes...

Would you get a FN 1906(Baby Browning) or a Colt 1908 vest?
It would be strictly a BUG but i was wondering if there was any major quality difference?(I really like the look of the flutted barrel on the Colt dont know if theres one on the FN)
Does anyone have a link to test results for the .25 ACP? (Wetpack/ something similar to "The Box 'O Truth")
I have seen models with extended bbl's does anyone know about these?
Any info on either would be appreciatted!

Thanks-
D.C.
8/3/2006 6:29:41 PM EDT
[#1]
I vote for the Browning. As for .25acp info, it won't be too terribly higher/stronger than the .22LR, IMO.

IOW, somewhere just higher than a sharp stick.    
8/3/2006 6:32:04 PM EDT
[#2]
25acp is notorious for under penetration even with fmj
8/4/2006 6:05:52 PM EDT
[#3]
Yeah, I think I'd take a .22 over a .25.  With all the great choices in highly concealable pistols why on earth would you pick those two anyway?????
8/10/2006 8:37:26 PM EDT
[#4]
Neither is an effective defense round.

Why not a j-frame in .38 with performance ammo?
8/25/2006 8:35:04 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
I know this forum will probably be biased but here goes...

Would you get a FN 1906(Baby Browning) or a Colt 1908 vest? ...


This is a Colt forum, isn't it.