Posted: 5/16/2006 9:19:17 AM EDT
| I saw one of the new mod 29's for sale at a local shop for $865 and was wondering how that is for price. The other shops in the area are asking 999 and up for them. |
| Geezus! That sounds high as a cat's ass to me, but I am an old fart and remember when they were selling for well under $500 NIB. For sure, I would never give anywhere near either figure for a new S&W with the lock. Do some searching and I bet you can find an older, classical model at not much morte than half that price with very little wear...with no MIM parts and no damned lock! |
Seems to sum it up perfectly, IMO. |
Hah! I guess getting to be an old fart beats the heck out of the alternative...which is about all the good I see in getting older! |
Hey!! I resemble that remark! |
|
I picked up a LNIB 6" 29 at a gun show about 3 years ago for $425 out the door. It has been a while since I ran the serial number, but I think the gun was made in the mid 90's. No lock and old style cylinder latch. I really haven't watched M29 prices since then. I would think you could still get a gun like I bought for $500 or less. Roadstar |
I've heard this many times, but with good aftermarket grips, the .44mag isn't actually painful to shoot, IMO. Loud, yes; painful, no. This excludes the scandium frame versions, of course!
|
How about labelling those from L to R so those of us with less S&W knowledge can know what they are? Yes, the older ones are fine examples of the gunmaker's craft, and have a place in anyone's collection. But, why approach it as an either/or? Why not have old ones and new ones? |
Not to speak for him, but many wheel gun lovers approach it from a purist standpoint, IMO. Some do it because of the trigger lock, some do it from the bad S&W days when they had English owners & cozied up to the Klinton gun grabbers. Generally speaking, most S&W guns of 25+ years ago had a bit more hand-fitting to them. While today's CNC machining allows closer tolerances that make such hand-fitting unnecessary, the older units may often feel "smoother", IMO. My .o2 |
Left bank, small bores, right bank large bores. 38/44 Outdoorsman on top left, 28-2 below it, 27-2 bottom. 45ACP 25-2 with incorrectly labeled 1950 barrel(instead of 1955) top right, 25-3 45LC below that, 29-3 44Mag bottom(to be replaced by a 29-2 when I can find one in decent condition and price). Got 3-4 more to round out the collection, 44Spl. M24, hopefully true pre-model number 1950 Target Models 44Spl. and 45ACP, and pre model number 357Mag to matcn the 38/44 Outdoorsman. Not sure I want a 41Mag M57 when I already have a 44Mag. |
I won't buy anything with laser engraving on it. Hate metal injection molded parts. And in many ways hand fitting is where it is at, my 27-2 and 25-3 lock up so tight before the hammer drops that there is hardly any cylinder slop/play. The bluing on the older guns beats out most anything I've seen S&W manage over the past couple years. I'd love to get a blued Mountain Gun but the laser engraving and the god awful gold enlayed bullshit has gotta stop before I will ever get new production S&W. |

) for less money than the anniversary model. But, that is a different gun, and this IS ar15.com, so the appropriate answer is "buy both!" 

