Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
11/28/2009 7:04:25 PM EDT
I'm looking to get a Warren Tactical Rear and FO front from my 17 for use in IDPA/USPSA.  For those who have Warren's what height do you have on your front?  .215 (six o'clock hold) or .245 (Point of Aim/Impact)?
12/11/2009 7:25:53 PM EDT
[#1]
Had 3 glocks setup with the .215 fronts.   Point of impact was directly on the top of the front sight at 25yds.  Awesome sights!
12/12/2009 7:37:11 AM EDT
[#2]
I've got a .220 Ameriglo night sight in front, a WT solid black rear in back. The .005 makes no difference, shoots POA. I'll eventually end up with WT sights on all of the guns I own.
12/12/2009 4:31:05 PM EDT
[#3]
Not to hi-jack the thread, but what makes the Warren Tactical sights so great?  I'm not trying to say there is anything wrong with them, because I've never used them.  I just want to know why they get so much praise, since I'm trying to find a sight to standardize on for my Glocks.  I currently have experience with XS Big Dot sights which will be getting replaced by a Trijicon green front and yellow rear sight.
12/13/2009 12:51:31 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
Not to hi-jack the thread, but what makes the Warren Tactical sights so great?  I'm not trying to say there is anything wrong with them, because I've never used them.  I just want to know why they get so much praise, since I'm trying to find a sight to standardize on for my Glocks.  I currently have experience with XS Big Dot sights which will be getting replaced by a Trijicon green front and yellow rear sight.


The way they're shaped they force your eye to find the front sight.  When I show someone my Warren sights that's never seen them before I tell them to focus on the rear.  Their reply is usually "I can't"  or something to that effect.

12/14/2009 10:02:01 AM EDT
[#5]
I had XS Big Dots on my 26 and 17 and gave them a really good try - who wouldn't for the price.  I recently, however, replaced them with the Warren Tactical Night Sights 3-lamps and could not possibly be more satisfied with a sight system.  The rear lamps are smaller than the front and are a much softer amber color - front is big green.  Daylight, the front takes your eye as noted without having to search for it in the wide notch.  Lollipops just don' t work for me.
12/14/2009 6:36:40 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not to hi-jack the thread, but what makes the Warren Tactical sights so great?  I'm not trying to say there is anything wrong with them, because I've never used them.  I just want to know why they get so much praise, since I'm trying to find a sight to standardize on for my Glocks.  I currently have experience with XS Big Dot sights which will be getting replaced by a Trijicon green front and yellow rear sight.


The way they're shaped they force your eye to find the front sight.  When I show someone my Warren sights that's never seen them before I tell them to focus on the rear.  Their reply is usually "I can't"  or something to that effect.



This –– the shape of the rear sight just causes you to very instinctively align the front right in the middle of the rear and allows you to completely ignore it (the rear sight).
12/14/2009 7:13:20 PM EDT
[#7]
Are you guys using the Warren Tactical plain sights, plain rear with tritium or FO front, or tritium front and rear?
12/15/2009 4:04:33 PM EDT
[#8]
I originally had the tritium front plain rear set.  I don't like 3 dot sights.

I've upgraded to tritium front and single tritium rear warrens.   I like them more!!!!
12/15/2009 8:40:08 PM EDT
[#9]
As another *bump* I'd like to know what you guys run - 1, 2 or 3 dot?  I'm looking at the 1 dot myself.....
12/16/2009 7:32:24 AM EDT
[#10]
Warren Tactical Night Sight 3-lamp.  The front lamp is big, bright green.  The rear lamps are small, much less brighter than the front and amber coloured.  I simply acquire much faster and am more accurate with 3-dot than the lollipop design.

12/16/2009 2:02:05 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
As another *bump* I'd like to know what you guys run - 1, 2 or 3 dot?  I'm looking at the 1 dot myself.....


I've run the 1 lamp and upgraded to the 2 lamp.  either would work for me