Posted: 10/23/2007 9:42:47 AM EDT
Why hasnt Glock made a P/T version of the Glock 21?  The Glock 34 and 35 are very popular, so logically, there should be a P/T Glock 21 Anyone else share my frustration? |
|
I have smaller hands than the average man my size (6'0, 210lbs). I have used the Glock 21 on duty now for 4 1/2 years and I love the grip. There are some officers that have ordered a 21 SF with their money, but I really can't see the improvement. I guess my small hands lock into place in a perfect way and other smaller hands dont fit right. Personally, I feel that the internet has bashed on the standard frame (Glock 20 and 21) way too much. My life depends on the Glock 21 and I think the bad wrap that the frame has gotten is not right. Yes, this is my opinion. Everybody has an opinion, but I wish they would give Glock a break on the size of the frame. I do have really small hands too and I would never carry a Glock 22/35 or a 17/34 for duty use. the .45acp punch is a great round. Unfortunately, I have seen what a 230 grain hollow point does to a man. It aint pretty. I guess a .40 would suck too. Hell getting shot with anything would just plain suck (even a BB gun). Well, that was my two cents. I would be happy with a longslide, even a SF as long as they could make the standard frame too. I like options. JUST GIVE ME A LONGSLIDE 45 THAT IS NOT AFTERMARKET. |