User Panel
Another attempt at perfection.
First, single pin and no finger grooves, then two pin with finger grooves and now back to one pin with no finger grooves......make up your mind. I'll pass. They were innovative when they came out, but sat on their asses and the market caught up. What a shame. |
|
Quoted:
Another attempt at perfection. First, single pin and no finger grooves, then two pin with finger grooves and now back to one pin with no finger grooves......make up your mind. I'll pass. They were innovative when they came out, but sat on their asses and the market caught up. What a shame. View Quote Second, The change in locking block design negated the need for the second pin in 9mm, and the block still has provisions for a second pin in other calibers. Third, The finger grooves were removed because so many people were bitching about the finger grooves, and now people are bitching about not having finger grooves. So basically it does not matter what Glock does whiney ass people on the internet will still find something to bitch about... I personally don’t like the finger grooves. But if you do, the Gen4 is still produced. So I really cannot wrap my mind around all the people complaining about having more variety. /rant |
|
WHAT THE FUCK FUCKING FUCK FUCK FUCK!
FUCKING BULLSHIT! FUCK! I just want a damn Glock carbine already. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/24926/timesplitter88_BdZWI5JlsSa-408716.JPG At least those Austrian sons a bitches beveled the frame to match the slide. View Quote |
|
I’m gonna consider one. Im kinda in the market for a 17g5. If there’s a side by side with this - I’ll give it a look. But I’m not going out of my way to get one. Especially if the price is ludicrous.
|
|
I don't understand the point of this gun and I certainly won't buy it but I am glad Glock is bringing out new stuff.
To me this is a gun that will shoot like a 19 (i.e. not as good as a 17) and conceal like a 17 (i.e. not as good as a 19). I just don't see the purpose but I hope they sell shit loads of them and use the profits to develop better products than this. |
|
Quoted:
I don't understand the point of this gun and I certainly won't buy it but I am glad Glock is bringing out new stuff. To me this is a gun that will shoot like a 19 (i.e. not as good as a 17) and conceal like a 17 (i.e. not as good as a 19). I just don't see the purpose but I hope they sell shit loads of them and use the profits to develop better products than this. View Quote If this thread is any indication, there seems to be a market for the 19X though.....so congrats to the people that want it I do like the color of it though....hopefully it spreads to some other guns. |
|
Quoted: First, The 19X was likely brought to market because people showed interest in the MHS submission. Not another “attempt at perfection” Second, The change in locking block design negated the need for the second pin in 9mm, and the block still has provisions for a second pin in other calibers. Third, The finger grooves were removed because so many people were bitching about the finger grooves, and now people are bitching about not having finger grooves. So basically it does not matter what Glock does whiney ass people on the internet will still find something to bitch about... I personally don’t like the finger grooves. But if you do, the Gen4 is still produced. So I really cannot wrap my mind around all the people complaining about having more variety. /rant View Quote That being said I have little interest in this new offering. Looks cool, not for me I guess. |
|
New Glock Model G19X Pistol Review |
|
TCT beat me to posting the link.
It looks like they will to me. The X uses Gen 4 style mags. Edit to add, Gen 5 mags will work if you change the base plates to Gen 4 or earlier. John |
|
|
|
Exactly what I am looking for, I’ll take two the 19X is reasonably priced.
18Z50.....saddled w the Glock by SOCOM, before it was trendy. |
|
You know, I was down on this thing from the beginning, not understanding why I'd want a G17 grip with a G19 slide.
But the more I think about this, I think I want one to put a micro comp on and do a grip chop. I like the G17 grip better than the G19, even when chopped. The slide being a 19 would go to a 17 with the micro comp. |
|
Quoted:
Threads like this show why people think the Glock community is so toxic... Glock makes the 42 - People bitch because it’s not a 9mm Glock makes the 43 - People bitch because it's bigger than the .380 Glock makes the Gen5 without finger grooves (like the community asked for) - People bitch because they want the finger grooves back Glock introduces the 19X (because people showed interest in the MHS) - People bitch because it' not what THEY wanted... I have never seen a community that will literally bitch about absolutely ANYTHING that a company does. http://e.lvme.me/ub1smht.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Another attempt at perfection. First, single pin and no finger grooves, then two pin with finger grooves and now back to one pin with no finger grooves......make up your mind. I'll pass. They were innovative when they came out, but sat on their asses and the market caught up. What a shame. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Yeah, yeah you're right. I just guess people haven't figured it out yet. I guess until they do Glock will just keep selling triple, all the xds, m&p's etc combined. View Quote It has a long running track record of being a good performer. It was available to the masses when it was a contemporary offering. It has a following of people who enjoy customization. Large aftermarket. Can build one without ever buying a part from Glock (poly 80 and aftermarket parts). |
|
|
The Blue Label 19X will be # PX1950702, and sell for $533.50, and that is with night sights. View Quote |
|
Just saw that the Gen 5 glock mags won't fit this model. Ouch! Watch the vid at 6:18.
New Glock Model G19X Pistol Review |
|
Quoted:
Just saw that the Gen 5 glock mags won't fit this model. Ouch! Watch the vid at 6:18. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8c3P1X0PTkg View Quote |
|
|
Instead of creating a ‘mutt’ to appease someone, Glock should have stayed out of the Mil. contract because A G19 is the best combat handgun on the market. And it’s clear that’s not what the Mil. was looking for.
|
|
Quoted:
I don't understand the point of this gun and I certainly won't buy it but I am glad Glock is bringing out new stuff. To me this is a gun that will shoot like a 19 (i.e. not as good as a 17) and conceal like a 17 (i.e. not as good as a 19). View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Has MSRP been released? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Another attempt at perfection. First, single pin and no finger grooves, then two pin with finger grooves and now back to one pin with no finger grooves......make up your mind. I'll pass. They were innovative when they came out, but sat on their asses and the market caught up. What a shame. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/24926/timesplitter88_BdZWI5JlsSa-408716.JPG At least those Austrian sons a bitches beveled the frame to match the slide. View Quote As far as this offering, I don't get all the whining. What is the downside to having more options? It would be one thing if they took the 19 completely away, and only offered this. Or wait, is that what they're doing? Then I'd be complaining. But if it's just ANOTHER option, what is the problem? I didn't like the finger grooves on the 19 but didn't mind them on the 26. I think it's best to just leave them off all guns because everyone's hand is different. Although I'm sure there are generalizations. Personally, what I'd like to see is them expand the single stack line. Make a bigger 43. Same width, bigger frame and slide. G19 single stack. If the width of the slide works on the 43, then you don't really need it to be as wide as it is on the 26/19/17. But whatever. I'm not saying get rid of those. I'm just saying keep adding more sizes to the Single Stack. Although I'm not sure a Single stack 17 would make all that much sense. But they could offer more calibers. A single stack .45 about G19 size would probably be a good idea too. And .40. Although lots of people like to hate the 40 round here. I like different colors than black. If nothing other than just variety. I don't think it makes much of a difference other than just to say, oh that's nice. Black works too. But gets boring. |
|
Quoted:
As far as this offering, I don't get all the whining. What is the downside to having more options? It would be one thing if they took the 19 completely away, and only offered this. Or wait, is that what they're doing? Then I'd be complaining. But if it's just ANOTHER option, what is the problem? View Quote What would be a more interesting use of bandwidth is to discuss (speculate about) why they thought the Army needed a full size grip with a compact slide. Did something in the MHS solicitation ask for that? Did discussions with the Army steer Glock in that direction? The only wild speculation that I can come up with is that they were trying to keep the overall length down when using a suppressor (trying to keep SF and SOCOM in mind). Or that they started with the 19 originally, but somewhere along the way, someone asked for more grip length for people with larger hands. At that point, they didn’t want to lengthen the slide because they were already working with the G19 weight and dimensions, so they just lengthened the grip by itself. |
|
Hyatt wants $750 for pre-order. So that means prolly under $650 everywhere else
|
|
I'm probably going to trade in my 17.5 for one. First i like the "Commander" style in guns. Two, I've always wanted some FDE glock mags.
|
|
I want to see one first hand. The longer grip doesn’t bother me, since I don’t typically carry a G19 size pistol anyway.
|
|
I definitely can't see paying more than what you'd pay for a Gen 4 or 5.
|
|
Quoted:
What I think is funny is all the people complaining that Glock didn’t design the G19X (i.e. the MHS) “for me.” The pistol that Glock designed for the military. They’re just trying to capitalize on the time and money they put into the MHS competition. It’s not going to be tailored for civilian shooters or concealed carriers. It is what it already was for the MHS competition. What would be a more interesting use of bandwidth is to discuss (speculate about) why they thought the Army needed a full size grip with a compact slide. Did something in the MHS solicitation ask for that? Did discussions with the Army steer Glock in that direction? The only wild speculation that I can come up with is that they were trying to keep the overall length down when using a suppressor (trying to keep SF and SOCOM in mind). Or that they started with the 19 originally, but somewhere along the way, someone asked for more grip length for people with larger hands. At that point, they didn’t want to lengthen the slide because they were already working with the G19 weight and dimensions, so they just lengthened the grip by itself. View Quote |
|
Glock fan boy checking in I really want this! Like the matching color package! Cool gun all around IMO, do want!
|
|
Quoted: What cancels easier; a 5" revolver or a 4" revolver? View Quote This gun isn't for me but I am not against it in any way. Like I said, I hope they sell the shit out of them. There is obviously people that like it so I'm glad they made it. If Glock is bringing out new products I'm happy. |
|
They're calling it a crossover so I guess you have to be a soccer mom to buy it.
|
|
|
I have never owned a Glock, but it seems fitting that after I just tried my buddies G19 gen 4 the other day I said.:
" I would kinda want this gun if it didn't have finger grooves and a slightly longer grip for my big ass hands" And then Glock releases a 19 sized gun with no finger grooves, and a longer grip. I will buy one. |
|
When I buy this, I'm gonna be tier one as fuck.
Only the tier one killas rock tan shit. Who's down? |
|
Failed To Load Title |
|
Meh Gen5 17 frame almost except Gen5 mag floorplates don’t work and a 19.5 slide. Not really my thing.
|
|
I can't believe they didn't release a bolt action .22. This is what people want. Glock is out of touch with today's customers. They could have sold dozens of these.
|
|
|
There seems to be a lot of misconception that this pistol is somehow intended for concealed carry. It certainly could work in that role but its primary function (in the MHS format) was a duty pistol. Concealed carry is hardly the only market there is for handguns and despite what is posted here I doubt most concealed carriers carry a gun even as large as a G19. At any rate Glock already makes a great gun for concealed carry for those who can live with its size, some may have heard of it, it is called the 19. I don't really buy into the utility of a G17 slide on a G19 frame. I'm not against Glock making it, the more the merrier, if it sells then great. However, are we really convinced that an extra 1/2" of barrel/slide is the answer to our concealed carry prayers? Sure, it might offer a slight overall improvement but I think it is way oversold. I don't notice a practical difference in speed of handling or accuracy between my G17 and G19. If there is any difference at all in terms of handling it is slightly in favor of the 19.
The shorter slide makes sense in a duty holster. My first duty gun was a Beretta 92. There is a huge difference in comfort level when sitting in a patrol car (or other vehicle I imagine, I was never in the military) with a 5" barreled gun as opposed to a 4" barreled gun. Sure, its an inch, but in the case of a duty holster it is an extra inch sticking into the seat and pushing the holster up or banging into the seat belt anchor in the seat. My G23 duty gun is a lot more comfortable than the Beretta 96 it replaced when seated in a car. The 19x also makes sense, just like a 17 or 19, for home defense. There is nothing wrong with choosing a shorter slide/longer frame for that role and it might work for some people. Nothing wrong with more choices. If I am ever in a position where I have to provide my own duty gun I would seriously consider this; shorter slide for comfort when seated, full size grip and two extra rounds. I'll probably buy one anyway just because I like the way it looks. I don't "need" it, but I don't "need" most of my guns. On the other hand, the whole 19 frame/17 slide thing doesn't appeal to me at all. Different strokes for different folks. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.