Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/2/2015 5:07:49 PM EDT
First off...I reload 380 ACP for my G42 using one time brass.  I am careful to inspect each round at the bottom and never load to max.  This picture shows a 9mm and 380 Auto Glock chamber illustrating open area at the feed ramp.  Your thoughts?  PS:  I really dig chatter on this controversial KABOOM issue

2/2/2015 5:25:28 PM EDT
[#1]
With a max pressure of 21,500psi (380 Auto) vs 35,000psi for 9mm, I wouldn't be worried at all about a chance for kB!'s!

2/2/2015 5:49:44 PM EDT
[#2]
My Gen2 .45 and .40 have less chamber support than that. They havent blown a case yet.
2/3/2015 10:12:56 AM EDT
[#3]
Most semi-autos have a similar cutout at the back of the firing chamber in order to facilitate reliable feeding.  
It doesn't bother me especially.  The 1911 also has a cutout.  Now some manufacturers get a little bit too aggressive with this design feature.  Possibly GLOCK is guilty of this with some of their designs, the .40S&W for example.

The .380acp cartridge operates at the same pressure level as the .45acp cartridge (21,000psi), so one doesn't want to get too cavalier about this.  But it isn't a high operating pressure cartridge.  Of course, there would be a bit more margin of safety if it operated down around the .38 Special pressure level of 17,000psi.

I believe that S&W is actually using MIM barrels for their .380s and I think this is a pretty crappy design, but apparently they feel they can "get away with it".  And more and more, "getting away with it" seems to be what contemporary pistol design is all about and that sucks.

But bottom-line:  I wouldn't worry about the G42.  Until proven otherwise, it seems to be a well made pistol to me.  The short recoil unlocked design is one indicator that Glock didn't want to cut too many corners….they could have opted for straight blowback if saving money were the priority.