Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
5/25/2014 5:22:11 PM EDT
are these any more desirable than a standard 23???  I have one that I cannot carry any longer (long story) and was going to swap barrels to be in compliance but then got to thinking about since these are discontinued, someone may be wanting one,,,,,,,,comments??
5/25/2014 10:08:18 PM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
are these any more desirable than a standard 23???  I have one that I cannot carry any longer (long story) and was going to swap barrels to be in compliance but then got to thinking about since these are discontinued, someone may be wanting one,,,,,,,,comments??
View Quote


compliance?
6/18/2014 2:19:24 PM EDT
[#2]
I assume LEO. I would not want to carry a "C" Glock due to the possibility of shooting from inside a vehicle or from the held close to the chest "guard" position due to the flame.

I believe they are less popular then regular non-ported Glocks but someone is sure to buy it...
6/18/2014 9:31:54 PM EDT
[#3]
Would it fit a Gen 4 27 frame???
6/18/2014 9:55:41 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Quoted:
Would it fit a Gen 4 27 frame???
View Quote


G27? No, the frame is too small I believe. G19 or G32, yes. See here

As far as Gen3/Gen4 interoperability goes, IIRC someone tested and found that a complete Gen 3 upper assembly (including recoil spring assembly) can work on a Gen 4 frame, but a Gen 4 upper assembly (including it's necessary recoil spring assembly) will not fit or function on a Gen 3 lower (in general, there are some exceptions)
6/19/2014 1:51:03 AM EDT
[#5]
The whole gun might be desirable since they have been apparently discontinued.

I doubt you'll be able to swap for a barrel that easily since the slide would have to be cut for someone to use it.