Posted: 10/17/2009 10:52:06 PM EDT
|
Ive looked through the pic thread sticky at the top and i see lots of pics of gear carried every day . I would like too see pictures of how your pistol and holster setup as you are wearing it . bonus if you pack a g22 lol . That is what i am purchasing and im looking for holster setup options . thank you
and by the way I do not need too hear i should pick a smaller framed weapon or a differant weapon. If I happen too print a little due too my choice so be it it is m y right too carry and concealing is only for day too day interaction with people who may be offended, officers ext. will spot and make me i do not care i only carry where legal and allowable. |
|
Don't have a pic right now. I push Alabama Holster all the time on this site. They custom make, IMO the best Glock holsters in the market. They have pics of the carry rig in use on their site. Check them out.
alabamaholster.com |
|
Quoted:
Here's (one of) my every-day carry setups. Glock G20SF in a Blackhawk Serpa holster. http://img.geocaching.com/user/56e17073-8db4-4c0e-8ede-442ccd938f62.jpg Don't tell me that's at the fish market there in Seattle?!?! If so, you've got some balls, my friend! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Here's (one of) my every-day carry setups. Glock G20SF in a Blackhawk Serpa holster. Don't tell me that's at the fish market there in Seattle?!?! If so, you've got some balls, my friend! Pike Place Market in downtown Seattle. Open carry is lawful (without a permit or license) in Washington, no balls required. Girls can OC too! 
|
|
Nice setup, good looking salmon there too.
Quoted:
Here's (one of) my every-day carry setups. Glock G20SF in a Blackhawk Serpa holster. http://img.geocaching.com/user/56e17073-8db4-4c0e-8ede-442ccd938f62.jpg |
|
Quoted: Here's (one of) my every-day carry setups. Glock G20SF in a Blackhawk Serpa holster. http://img.geocaching.com/user/56e17073-8db4-4c0e-8ede-442ccd938f62.jpg Nice rig.  |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Here's (one of) my every-day carry setups. Glock G20SF in a Blackhawk Serpa holster. Don't tell me that's at the fish market there in Seattle?!?! If so, you've got some balls, my friend! Pike Place Market in downtown Seattle. Open carry is lawful (without a permit or license) in Washington, no balls required. Girls can OC too!
I know it's lawful, my friend, I live in WA too! You know what I mean though..............Seattle cops and whatnot....................................I for one am glad you've been able to carry that way there with no problems.
|
|
Quoted:
vini he gets away with it becouse he is a fed lol joking the glasses definently look cop though thenks for the replies ill look into the holster outfit No, I 'get away with it' because it's 100% lawful! Oh, and you won't see any cop or fed wearing Oakley Juliets, price them sometime and you'll understand. 
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: No, I 'get away with it' because it's 100% lawful!vini he gets away with it becouse he is a fed lol joking the glasses definently look cop though thenks for the replies ill look into the holster outfit Oh, and you won't see any cop or fed wearing Oakley Juliets, price them sometime and you'll understand. A right not exercised is a right soon lost.  |
|
Quoted:
its not really a right so much, as its a privilege. if it was your right, your state couldnt come back and later revoke your license. and make sure your state allows your weapon to print. in texas, printing=not concealed. My interpretation of the Constitution is a bit different... The state makes people get marriage licenses too...does that mean getting married is a "privilege" granted by the state? What about owning a dog? The idea that the state can turn a right into a privilege is what is commonly believed, and it exactly why our Founders made sure there was a 2 Amendment. They knew in time our government like all before them would claim God-Given rights were privileges granted by elected officials. A right can never be denied. A privilege can be. The right to protect my life is not a Privilege...no matter what "law" they pass. That is the essence of Freedom. |
|
Quoted:
its not really a right so much, as its a privilege. if it was your right, your state couldnt come back and later revoke your license. and make sure your state allows your weapon to print. in texas, printing=not concealed. That may, and certainly seems to be, the case there in TX. Here in Washington the courts would disagree with your contention. In State v Casad, the trial court ruled, and the appellate court confirmed, that a citizen of the state of Washington has the right to carry a firearm openly and that the police cannot detain someone merely for doing so. The trial court held:
Here, the Defendant was carrying a rifle only partially concealed and clearly identifiable as a rifle to the citizen who made the call as well as law enforcement officers, with the barrel pointing towards the ground walking on a main thoroughfare in the City of Port Angeles in daylight hours. In fact there were two rifles, which would likely be less alarming than the carrying of one rifle. Nothing indicates that the manner in which the Defendant was carrying the weapons in any way would give reasonable cause for alarm unless the mere fact of carrying a weapon within the city limits in the open in daylight on a major thoroughfare in and of itself would cause such alarm. The statute does not and, under the [Washington State] Constitution, cannot prohibit the mere carrying of a firearm in public. Therefore the Court finds that the officers at the time of the initial contact had no reasonable articulable suspicion that any criminal activity was occurring. ...the trial court found that Casad did not carry the weapons in a manner that would warrant reasonable alarm. This factor is heavily contested by the parties, primarily based on individuals’ reactions to seeing a gun carried on a city street and whether Casad pointed one rifle barrel toward the roadway. We note that, in connection with this case, several individuals have commented that they would find it strange, maybe shocking, to see a man carrying a gun down the street in broad daylight. Casad’s appellate counsel conceded that she would personally react with shock, but she emphasized that an individual’s lack of comfort with firearms does not equate to reasonable alarm. We agree. It is not unlawful for a person to responsibly walk down the street with a visible firearm, even if this action would shock some people. Emphasis added. . |
I hardly ever carry my G22 other than in the winter when I wear a big jacket because it prints so bad. The G27 in the MTac has absolutely zero print, no one ever knows I have a gun on, not even my g/f unless she sees me put it on or accidently hits it. The J frame is the all time beat around summer where ever carry. It was my dads backup gun so it has seen better days. |
|
cray what holster is that? on the g22
I hope i did not come off as denying the RIGHT too open or concealed carry I prefer too stay concealed, im just not teribbly worried about printing as i believe a g22 will be made by anyone paying close attention due too its size but carring it as concealed as possible is my preferance |
|
Quoted:
cray what holster is that? on the g22 I hope i did not come off as denying the RIGHT too open or concealed carry I prefer too stay concealed, im just not teribbly worried about printing as i believe a g22 will be made by anyone paying close attention due too its size but carring it as concealed as possible is my preferance thats a Blackhawk Serpa holster. |
|
Quoted:
cray what holster is that? on the g22 I hope i did not come off as denying the RIGHT too open or concealed carry I prefer too stay concealed, im just not teribbly worried about printing as i believe a g22 will be made by anyone paying close attention due too its size but carring it as concealed as possible is my preferance The G27 is in a MTac, G22 in a Blackhawk serpa, and the .38 S&W is in a Galco IWB. All serve their purpose and function flawlessly. If I were going to open carry the 22 I would use the serpa or a holster with a strap as to lesson the chance of someone grabbing it. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
its not really a right so much, as its a privilege. if it was your right, your state couldnt come back and later revoke your license. and make sure your state allows your weapon to print. in texas, printing=not concealed. My interpretation of the Constitution is a bit different... The state makes people get marriage licenses too...does that mean getting married is a "privilege" granted by the state? What about owning a dog? The idea that the state can turn a right into a privilege is what is commonly believed, and it exactly why our Founders made sure there was a 2 Amendment. They knew in time our government like all before them would claim God-Given rights were privileges granted by elected officials. A right can never be denied. A privilege can be. The right to protect my life is not a Privilege...no matter what "law" they pass. That is the essence of Freedom. I agree, of course, that owning and carrying a firearm is a right. No doubt about it! However I don't think your analogies of marriage and dog ownership are the greatest out there. Marriage would be a privilege, especially to the "rainbow crowd". They do not have the right or ability to get married since marriage is a legal status. Now of course you could argue that marriage is a promise between two individuals but we are talking about legal matters and as far as that is concerned marriage is a legal privilege that not all people have the right to. Dog ownership, on the other hand, I'm not sure you can say is a god given right. It's more of a thing that has been regulated when there is very little reason to do so. More so to appease the animal rights activists and bring in a few extra tax dollars I'd guess. The dog angel might be a bit stronger than the marriage angel but neither are granted by the constitution. |