AK Sponsor
Posted: 2/2/2013 2:52:52 PM EDT
|
How many groups, of how many rounds, are you shooting between adjustments when you are trying to find the best torque?
It seems that you would need to shoot a bunch to account for the inconsistency of the system and its ammo. A couple of summers ago I shot a quadruple-shit load of ten round groups at 100 meters over many range days with a PSL and a variety of ammo. I had 10-shot groups that went into anything from 1.5" to 7+". With less consistent ammo (like most x54R) sometimes the variables stack in your favor, and you get a falsely good group (10 shots in 1.5") and sometimes they stack negatively to produce a misleadingly bad group (7+ moa). Seems like you'd want to shoot a lot between adjustments to get a true value. |
|
Quoted:
How many groups, of how many rounds, are you shooting between adjustments when you are trying to find the best torque? It seems that you would need to shoot a bunch to account for the inconsistency of the system and its ammo. A couple of summers ago I shot a quadruple-shit load of ten round groups at 100 meters over many range days with a PSL and a variety of ammo. I had 10-shot groups that went into anything from 1.5" to 7+". With less consistent ammo (like most x54R) sometimes the variables stack in your favor, and you get a falsely good group (10 shots in 1.5") and sometimes they stack negatively to produce a misleadingly bad group (7+ moa). Seems like you'd want to shoot a lot between adjustments to get a true value. And then change the torque to confirm its the tensioner that's giving the groups and not some other variable. Its called scientific method. |
|
Shot 4 types of ammo, 3 rd groups each at every 5 inch lbs from 40 to 65. No time in between
except to tape up new targets. Rifle was hot. You could see the groups close then open back up for each type of ammo. Been doing the tensioners long enough to know what works and what doesn't. Shooting groups and letting the rifle cool shows nothing. This amount of pics don't come close to what I fired. I shot for 4 hrs. Had a premium match grade barrel custom chambered on a bluprinted bolt action give terrible groups. That barrel just had stress in it. Kept cutting 3/4 to one inch off and recrowing and even that one hit a sweet spot. More than one way to change harmonics. Lot of guys have chopped their barrels on PSL and they shot a lot better. Except for the velocity there's not a lot of difference in results. Both change harmonics. One is tuneable, the other is not. Take the front sight off one of your threaded AKs. Get a piece of seemless tubing that is big enough to fit and install it behind a flash hider. Get a few types of ammo and go to the range. It is going to take hours and a lot of shooting. You will see a difference. The better (consistent) ammo you use, the more refined your results will be. Hell a couple boxes of that Hornady Zombie ammo with the 123 will give better results than 90 percent of what else is out there. I've still got some Chinese steel core that amazes me with the accuracy out of a NHM-91 heavy barrel. When I get some time, I'll probably be doing this again with a reload of Sierra 150 .311 SP over a load of 4064 or H4895. But those tests will be done with the shorty, as I am only keeping one. |
|
I think that the work that you did on the rifle looks excellent.
However, where i disagree with you is on your testing methodology. I don't believe that a three round group produces enough useful data to make a change. Three round groups will expand and shrink between groups based on any number of variables, and with a PSL and x54r ammo, those variables are significant. |
|
If you're using your torque wrench with a crow's foot, you aren't getting accurate torque readings.
You need to use the formula here, http://www.engineersedge.com/manufacturing_spec/torque_wrench_1.htm, to calculate the actual torque value. |
|
Quoted:
If you're using your torque wrench with a crow's foot, you aren't getting accurate torque readings. You need to use the formula here, http://www.engineersedge.com/manufacturing_spec/torque_wrench_1.htm, to calculate the actual torque value. That is correct in absolutes ... but all that matters in this case is relative. We don't need to know the exactness of any setting, only how to return to it with the same tool. |
|
Quoted:
If the crows foot is at a 90 degree angle to the center line of the torque wrench, it does not increase the length. So it should not increase the torque. At least that's what they taught us (or what I remember) in aviation repair school. You are correct, having the crows foot at 90 degrees does not increase the torque. |
AK Sponsor


















