Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AK Sponsor
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
7/29/2006 3:59:39 PM EDT
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 4:05:35 PM EDT
[#1]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 4:11:27 PM EDT
[#2]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 4:19:42 PM EDT
[#3]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 4:25:35 PM EDT
[#4]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 4:32:05 PM EDT
[#5]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 4:35:41 PM EDT
[#6]
Wow...


That is all I can say.
7/29/2006 4:39:00 PM EDT
[#7]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  .
7/29/2006 4:51:02 PM EDT
[#8]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 5:00:40 PM EDT
[#9]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 5:20:52 PM EDT
[#10]
Thanks for the info
7/29/2006 5:56:49 PM EDT
[#11]
thermocafe,

Thanks for the awesome reviews and pictures of the milled Vector and the Armory AKs.  Those are the best AK reviews I've read.  You certainly did your homework and spent alot of time and money.  I've been trying to decide between the Vector milled and the Armory SSR and now I know I will be happy with either one.

7/29/2006 6:28:21 PM EDT
[#12]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 7:02:04 PM EDT
[#13]
Thermo,

Great buy!  Beautiful gun!  So much nicer than the rifle they have pictured on their website.  It just exudes quality.

Bud
7/29/2006 7:44:58 PM EDT
[#14]
Oh Man !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many Thanks Thermocafe,  that gun looks just like the Legend.

I see 2 tiny prongs under the front sight unit; I bet the original Legend/AK-47  bayonet

would snap right onto that gun.
7/29/2006 8:01:18 PM EDT
[#15]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/29/2006 10:19:05 PM EDT
[#16]
thermocafe,

Have you shot it yet??
7/29/2006 11:17:06 PM EDT
[#17]


I am wiping the drool off now.

That is one nice looking rifle!
7/30/2006 1:35:46 PM EDT
[#18]
Those scratches on the mag well, did it come like that or did you do it?

Looks like the parkerazation might be a little thin there.
7/30/2006 1:39:05 PM EDT
[#19]
Nice rifle.
7/31/2006 1:20:17 PM EDT
[#20]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/31/2006 1:44:15 PM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:
Talked to vector.  Apparently they are blued steel, similar to the milled Legends, and those scratches were put there after the rifled was delivered.  (I honestly don't know who did that.  There were lots of oglers before I got it home...)



That would chap my ass to have a dealer finger fuck my rifle before transfer.

Remember reading about a dealer in the Houston area that would range test transfers if it was a interesting gun. A few people had NIB guns that were collectabile in their pristine state and the transfer dealer would blow a few mags through them with out the owners permission.

Hootbro
7/31/2006 3:34:34 PM EDT
[#22]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
7/31/2006 4:51:23 PM EDT
[#23]
Sorry, I like my rifles to be beautiful. I guess its a weakness. Although my Glock is a little beat up, but I carry it a lot.
8/1/2006 12:53:58 PM EDT
[#24]
Man! The wood is beautiful! Great detail thanks for sharing that!
8/2/2006 6:32:18 AM EDT
[#25]
That is a beautiful firearm.  If you shoot it - lets us know how that goes.  Congrats!!
8/2/2006 8:09:55 AM EDT
[#26]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
8/2/2006 5:26:59 PM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:
About my previous post, for those who care (I don't but I know some do) the adjustable sight on top is NOT painted in the numbers.  They are just cut.

Here is something I quite like about this rifle:

i68.photobucket.com/albums/i31/thermocafe/vector%20milled/IMG_0309.jpg

Notice the firing pin: it is not spring loaded, rather it is the old style original free floating.  There are those who say (Kokalis, for one) that sooner or later you will get a slam-fire without the spring-loaded firing pin.  I trust that I will (if anyone knows, he probably does), but I will take that chance for the reliability.  If the spring breaks, you have a true jam and are screwed - NOT that likely, but hey, it's one less thing to possibly have to worry about.  This way, it is up to me to practice proper loading and unloading technique, with zero chance of a spring-jam.  

With the AK I was always taught in the military to use the karate-chop section of palm (for lack of a better descriptor) against the receiver, palm up to charge one of these, much similar to the Garand.  That way if there is a slam fire, your hand will survive due to the anatomical adaptation of sliding along your arm.  If you pull the charging handle with the web of your hand next to the receiver/palm down like most civies do, then if it goes off you're seriously screwed.


When you say Karate chop part (I need to learn the manual of arms for AKs) I presume you mean the part that is on the pinky side (e.g. palm away from gun back of hand toward it?)?

Any other tips you have would be great - I pick up my two new AKs on Sunday - and I have one of these on order (after your post) for my old man.
8/2/2006 7:26:23 PM EDT
[#28]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
8/2/2006 10:53:18 PM EDT
[#29]
Thermocafe, This is the second best post I have read in the AK forum. The first one was your review of the SSR-85C-2. You are the man!
8/3/2006 5:51:43 AM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:
EBKOBRA45:  I will try to demonstrate what I mean...

Here, you see the charging handle being cycled properly.  This is important in charging the rifle, but even more important in clearing mis-fires or unloading the rifle.  

i68.photobucket.com/albums/i31/thermocafe/vector%20milled/IMG_0002.jpg

The picture's slightly blurry, but you get the idea.  If you think about what would happen if a round discharged as the operator was charging it, the handle would slide thru the pinky and push the hand and arm out of the way, with maybe a bruise.

Now compare that to the incorrect method of charging, shown below:

i68.photobucket.com/albums/i31/thermocafe/vector%20milled/IMG_0004.jpg

Just try and imagine what would happen with a cook-off.  Ouch...it would tear the web of the thumb if the operator is lucky, and if not lucky it would probably separate it outright, all depending of course on the specific situation.

One other common thing is that you should probably sight it in at 25 yards.  With the M16, we were of course taught at ranges of 150 to 225 or so yards to aim a little low, because the parabolic arch of bullet trajectory at that range would put it slightly higher than the point of aim if sighted correctly.  At 25 yards, for example, the AR is sighted for 25 and 300 perfectly, and should shoot slightly high at 100 or 150.  That's the only other important point that is commonly missed that I can think of.  The AK, if memory serves, is then sighted at 25 and 250.

Hope this helps...


Great help - thanks!  Any advice on quick mag changes?
8/3/2006 5:52:18 AM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
Thermocafe, This is the second best post I have read in the AK forum. The first one was your review of the SSR-85C-2. You are the man!


+1 - some of the best posts I have seen as well.
8/3/2006 11:46:57 AM EDT
[#32]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
8/3/2006 12:53:56 PM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:
EBKOBRA45:  I will try to demonstrate what I mean...

Here, you see the charging handle being cycled properly.  This is important in charging the rifle, but even more important in clearing mis-fires or unloading the rifle.  

i68.photobucket.com/albums/i31/thermocafe/vector%20milled/IMG_0002.jpg

The picture's slightly blurry, but you get the idea.  If you think about what would happen if a round discharged as the operator was charging it, the handle would slide thru the pinky and push the hand and arm out of the way, with maybe a bruise.

Now compare that to the incorrect method of charging, shown below:

i68.photobucket.com/albums/i31/thermocafe/vector%20milled/IMG_0004.jpg

Just try and imagine what would happen with a cook-off.  Ouch...it would tear the web of the thumb if the operator is lucky, and if not lucky it would probably separate it outright, all depending of course on the specific situation.

One other common thing is that you should probably sight it in at 25 yards.  With the M16, we were of course taught at ranges of 150 to 225 or so yards to aim a little low, because the parabolic arch of bullet trajectory at that range would put it slightly higher than the point of aim if sighted correctly.  At 25 yards, for example, the AR is sighted for 25 and 300 perfectly, and should shoot slightly high at 100 or 150.  That's the only other important point that is commonly missed that I can think of.  The AK, if memory serves, is then sighted at 25 and 250.

Hope this helps...


thermocafe,

Not sure I agree with your charging and zeroing methods, but then again I have simply never seen them performed that way.

In my limited experience there are two primary ways to charge a Kalashnikov variant:

The first is the "turn and slap" method where the shooter turns the carbine 45 - 90 degrees to the left and the support hand then "slaps" the charging handle to the rear using the palm.




The other less common technique is the "underhand charge" where the support hand is brough under the carbine and the index and middle fingers are used to rack the charging handle.




Both of these methods allow the shooter to maintain their strong side hand on the pistol grip and theireyes and carbine pointed toward the threat.

As far as zeroing a 7.62x39mm Kalshnikov variant, it was my understanding that zeroing is performed at 100m with the rear leaf sight set at "300" from the prone or bench rested position. Point of impact should be 25cm above point of aim. This method brings the other ranges on the sight into battle zero.


You said:


With the AK I was always taught in the military to use the karate-chop section of palm (for lack of a better descriptor) against the receiver, palm up to charge one of these, much similar to the Garand.


Did you serve in a com-bloc military organization or are you referring to U.S. Army or Marine Corps threat weapons familiarization?

Thanks for any clarifying info.
8/3/2006 1:05:05 PM EDT
[#34]

The AK, if memory serves, is then sighted at 25 and 250.



it is  25 and 100 meters for AK-47

thermocafe

thanks for the charging AK info ... I used the incorrect method.
the review of Vector was amazing ... for such a splendid  job Vector should send you complimentary milled underfolder ... you deserve it
8/3/2006 1:24:50 PM EDT
[#35]
nice wood and nice metal
8/3/2006 1:40:09 PM EDT
[#36]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
8/3/2006 2:01:39 PM EDT
[#37]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
8/3/2006 4:23:51 PM EDT
[#38]
"Another thing I like about this is the heavy pistol grip. Yes it's perfectly matching wood, but it feels much more substantial in my hands than the smaller plastic ones."


I hope someone doesn't take this out of context.  Nice rifle by the way.  haha
8/4/2006 2:00:41 PM EDT
[#39]
I think I might want a Vector for my next gun.
8/4/2006 2:52:39 PM EDT
[#40]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
8/5/2006 6:40:57 PM EDT
[#41]
Sweet rifle. Great review.
The $250 extra for the underfolder version is not a bad price at all considering all the work that goes into converting an SLR-100 reciever to accept the underfolder stock.
I know I did four of them back in 2000.
8/26/2006 11:26:51 AM EDT
[#42]
Based on the previous report (thank you for the detail report and pictures), I decided what my new AK would be...a milled Vector with wood stock.  It arrived yesterday.  It looks like Vector shipped it the day after they got my order.  Nice workmanship; nice smooth wood.  Stock length is standard comblock length.  Non-matching numbers.  Parts and bore appeared brand new.  I did not feel the mags were loose in fit.  Friends were impressed with the appearance, all felt it weighed more than their stamped AK's, and all said it felt sturdier.  

Serial number MR2232.  The owners manual says the American parts are Receiver, Muzzle attachment, Gas Piston, Trigger, Hammer, Disconnector.  Since the receiver is listed as "American", I wonder if Vector had to finish the receiver.  The serial number was on the left side and was deeper and a different font than the other receiver markings.  Mine had the same other receiver marks that the reviewed AK had.  The Arsenal Bulgaria and importer marks on the right side were ligher than the reviewed AK and harder to read.  

Finish appears to be a dark, smooth parkerizing.  The addition of a small amount of oil to the metal makes it a bit darker, which I like.  Nice trigger pull.  I would have preferred a hole in the buttplate for an AK cleaning kit.  I will shoot it tomorrow, weather permitting.  I like it so far.
8/27/2006 9:55:12 AM EDT
[#43]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
8/27/2006 1:26:01 PM EDT
[#44]
Just got back from the range.  At 50yd off a rest, best was Golden Tiger with 1 1/2" 5 shot groups (1 group was 1").  Wolf gave 2" groups at 50yd and shot about a half inch lower.  No failures to feed or fire in 140rds including soft point bullets.  However, off the bench I had 3 instances of it firing twice with one pull of the trigger.  I believe it was "bump firing" as I was gently squeezing the trigger with not holding the rifle as tight and felt the rifle bounce off my shoulder a few times.  I have had the same thing when shooting my Garand, but never with other AK's.  When not using the bench/sand bags, there were no double fires.  It does have a smooth trigger pull which may have contributed.  

I often find Golden Tiger ammo more accurate than Wolf...too bad it can't be found now.
9/8/2006 12:19:43 PM EDT
[#45]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
9/9/2006 6:33:43 PM EDT
[#46]
I'm glad to see that you got out to shoot and practice some techniqes. I myself put in about 6 hours worth of square range time in the last week specifically with Kalashnikov variants.

The techniques that I referenced are not "my" techniques. Who taught you "your" technique?

The second technique that I described is taught by Saulius "Sonny" Puzikas, a former Spetsnaz operator. You can see it displayed in this (rather melodramatic) video:

strategosmedia.com/videos/AK-PROMO1.wmv

Some may consider this technique fanciful. Personally it is not the one that I use.

The first technique is taught by Pat Rogers in his 10-8/EAG AK-47 and Variants Course. This technique is the one that I consider to be most effective. In practice, the carbine need not be rotated or tilted very much at all.

What do you mean by "wood handle"? Do you mean the pistol grip? If it is loosening up you can loc-tite the threads in the PG screw.

I was recently attempting to establish correct holdovers for both the 5.45 and 7.62 zeroed at 100m. While gathering this data I was also practicing the speed reload and overhand charging techniques, along with transitions.

Thanks for sharing your opinions, and keep shooting that AK.
9/10/2006 11:11:20 AM EDT
[#47]
Tightened it up real nice.
9/16/2006 9:53:05 AM EDT
[#48]
Durnit - yesterday spent about 2.5 hours on the range, and now both the stock and the grip came lose.  To its credit, it never skipped on any shot.  It fired every single time I pulled the trigger.  Just a loose buttstock and grip made the drills somewhat tenuous.

If they come off, it'll be like holding a magic wand that spews bullets...I wonder if that's why those photos of the Iraqis with AKs showed lots of the wooden-furniture rifles with no buttstock, because they fall off under very heavy field use...hmmmm...just that I've never heard about that before with the AK series...

Oh well...just an update for you kind folks.  
9/18/2006 2:23:26 PM EDT
[#49]
That is a beautiful rifle, and this is a great thread.  Thanks for the info!
9/19/2006 3:14:33 PM EDT
[#50]
Deleted.  

Thank you JER!  
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
AK Sponsor