[ARCHIVED THREAD] - chrome bore vs non

Posted: 9/21/2006 12:38:09 PM EDT

Is the difference in chrome bore and not, that the chrome bore is less susceptible to rust but considered less accurate?? Or am I way off here?

Thanks

Posted: 9/21/2006 12:47:18 PM EDT

[#1]

Chrome bores are more wear and rust resistant.

Posted: 9/21/2006 12:56:45 PM EDT

[#2]

As crude as an AK style rifle is, even the best, I doubt you could measure the group size difference btw chrome and non-chrome.

Posted: 9/21/2006 1:57:26 PM EDT

[#3]

Thats what I was thinking just not sure.. Thanks for clearing it up..

Posted: 9/21/2006 2:25:26 PM EDT

[#4]

Chrome lined chambers aide in extraction, and are easier to clean.

Cases release easier from the hard surface of chrome. The chrome chamber is also less vulnerbale to getting scratched up from things like sand getting into the chamber while firing.

That is the single most important feature of chrome lining to me. Reliability.

Posted: 9/22/2006 5:41:44 AM EDT

[#5]

For slow fire it is hard to tell the life difference, but chrome resists wear much better when hot and roughly doubles the life of a blaster.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - chrome bore vs non

AK Sponsor

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - chrome bore vs non

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - chrome bore vs non