AR Sponsor
Posted: 12/26/2014 5:44:42 PM EDT
|
Quoted:
Ah, I misunderstood , hard reading/posting from the iPhone when my regular PC is 6k miles away. Edit: btw, I have the same scope except mil/mil reticle. I'm now spoiled on Nightforce. I like the mil reticle too. The MOAR just seemed to fit me better. I'm way impressed with the scope aside from the issue above. I may not go back either. |
|
Quoted:
Normal. Both of the NF scopes I have, F1, and 2.5-10x42 with digi-lum are both inconsistent across the reticle.. Well built, durable scopes, but NF's illumination sucks butt when it comes to being consistent across the entire reticle. Cool. Thanks for that. I'm debating whether or not to send it in to NF or back to Midway and getting another one. I mean it's not like it affects function, more cosmetic than anything. Just the principle since it's so expensive. I won't be shooting it for a bit so I have some time to decide. |
|
Quoted:
Cool. Thanks for that. I'm debating whether or not to send it in to NF or back to Midway and getting another one. I mean it's not like it affects function, more cosmetic than anything. Just the principle since it's so expensive. I won't be shooting it for a bit so I have some time to decide. Quoted:
Quoted:
Normal. Both of the NF scopes I have, F1, and 2.5-10x42 with digi-lum are both inconsistent across the reticle.. Well built, durable scopes, but NF's illumination sucks butt when it comes to being consistent across the entire reticle. Cool. Thanks for that. I'm debating whether or not to send it in to NF or back to Midway and getting another one. I mean it's not like it affects function, more cosmetic than anything. Just the principle since it's so expensive. I won't be shooting it for a bit so I have some time to decide. The x42 is a digital illumination but the x32 is not. If I remember correctly my x32 with hollow mil dots illuminated fully but don't take my word for it. I sold it a few months back so I may be wrong. |
AR Sponsor
