Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - best optic setup (Page 1 of 3)

Previous Page
/ 3
Next Page
10/26/2013 5:49:24 PM EDT
I want an optic setup that I can use effectively 0-400 whether it be for coyote and varmint hunting where coyotes could be far away and a rabbit pops out 20 ft away or 3 gun or civil unrest where I'll need to either hold down the fort or raid walmart...
10/26/2013 5:52:44 PM EDT
[#1]
Best case Aimpoint T-1
10/26/2013 6:01:14 PM EDT
[#2]
Leupold Mark 8 CQBSS 1x8
10/26/2013 6:12:50 PM EDT
[#3]
1x6 or red dot with a 3x magnifier.

I like the SWFA 1x6  but that's me.
10/26/2013 7:44:00 PM EDT
[#4]
why are variables better than an acog with an offset red dot? Isn't it faster to transition between both optics than it is to reach your hand up and dial it up or down.  I mean, what if you aren't sure what distance your'e giong to have to shoot??
10/26/2013 11:26:43 PM EDT
[#5]
Every "fighting/general purpose" carbine I have has an Aimpoint T1 on it.

You're rarely going to need to use your rifle with your life on the line beyond 50 yards (most likely much closer). And there's no other optic made that I can acquire targets quicker or more effective with than a T1.

You add a QD 3x magnifier to that, and there's no better all-around setup.
10/26/2013 11:37:54 PM EDT
[#6]
love my Elcan SpecterDR 1-4x (its actually for sale in the EE to fund my FDE Elcan) but hate the price tag! but it sounds perfect for what you want to use it for.. it works great on my hog slayer.. will have to wait till the Trijicon VCOG comes out and reassess my optics options
10/26/2013 11:39:03 PM EDT
[#7]
I ended up with my eotech on my rifle probably 80/20 vs my issued acog


ymmv
10/27/2013 5:04:52 AM EDT
[#8]
out of those 3: 1-4x

the Eotech is very good option.
10/27/2013 5:11:24 AM EDT
[#9]
Variable and ACOG.

I run a 1-4 on my Carbine and  TA31 on my Rifle.
10/27/2013 5:26:39 AM EDT
[#10]
It still seems as though most people are votng variable, but I agree that u need a t1 on there, but also having an acog means you've got a great option for target Iding and midrange engagements right? So why not that setup being superior to a variable that isn't quite as robust, has terrible battery life in comparison and takes time to adjust the magnification?
10/27/2013 5:27:15 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:
love my Elcan SpecterDR 1-4x (its actually for sale in the EE to fund my FDE Elcan) but hate the price tag! but it sounds perfect for what you want to use it for.. it works great on my hog slayer.. will have to wait till the Trijicon VCOG comes out and reassess my optics options
View Quote


What's the link?
10/27/2013 6:14:15 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote History
Quoted:
Every "fighting/general purpose" carbine I have has an Aimpoint T1 on it.

You're rarely going to need to use your rifle with your life on the line beyond 50 yards (most likely much closer). And there's no other optic made that I can acquire targets quicker or more effective with than a T1.

You add a QD 3x magnifier to that, and there's no better all-around setup.
View Quote


I kind of think like you , since I live in Phoenix but I'm in a state of frustration with my next AR optic.
I was trained as an instructor with an ACOG....I just don't like the idea of the 600 dollar re-lamp fee
I want to try a variable next...if it's not fast enough I could throw a RDS on top
I currently run an aimpoint

It is nice to have a powered optic for clearer target ID and more precise shots...
10/27/2013 8:06:34 AM EDT
[#13]





Quoted:






I want an optic setup that I can use effectively 0-400 whether it be for coyote and varmint hunting where coyotes could be far away and a rabbit pops out 20 ft away or 3 gun or civil unrest where I'll need to either hold down the fort or raid walmart...
View Quote
Sounds like you want more of a hunting/competition optics vs a "fighting" optic.

 















For what you want to do I would suggest a 1-4, but if your gun is solely set-up for "HD" or "fighting/SHTF" then I would suggest the Aimpoint.
















It's not really that hard at all to use a red dot at 0-300 meters, but .223/5.56 drops off a good amount at 400 depending on your zero so you will need to practice.
















Good luck.













ETA: Variable scopes, and ACOG's add a good amount of weight if that matters to you.










quote/unquote fighting set-up=9.2 pounds loaded based on a 1 pound 30r mag with 55 grain ammo























Hunting set-up for Deer and Hogs= 11 pounds loaded based on a 1 pound 30 r mag































 
10/27/2013 8:22:25 AM EDT
[#14]
I run a Nikon African 1-4 with German #4 reticle.  They sell them now but don't call them the African.  They are in the Monarch 3 lineup.






One inch tube.  Weighs about 12 ounces.  I do not want heavy scopes on my AR.  It has 120 inches of adjustment...like you need it.







It is very rugged.  Designed for heavy African game calibers.  It costs about $250.  Again.  How much do you need to spend?







I mount it in a LaRue LT 104 and have BUIS.







Works for me.  




ETA.  It has 4 inch eye relief..not a critical relief.  The ACOG has short and critical eye relief and is stupid expensive and fixed.

 
10/27/2013 8:39:52 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote History
Quoted:


What's the link?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
love my Elcan SpecterDR 1-4x (its actually for sale in the EE to fund my FDE Elcan) but hate the price tag! but it sounds perfect for what you want to use it for.. it works great on my hog slayer.. will have to wait till the Trijicon VCOG comes out and reassess my optics options


What's the link?


http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_7_163/1234493_WTS___PRICE_DROPPED___1830_SHIPPED_LNIB_Black_Elcan_SpecterDR_1_4x_7_62_calibrated_w__Bikini_Cover.html
10/27/2013 9:28:50 AM EDT
[#16]
Why not the best of both worlds and use a low power variable with an illuminated red dot?  Leupold has a low power variable in a 1" tube in its Mark AR Mod 1 series and a 30mm with better glass and more elevation in its VX-R Patrol series.  You can leave it cranked down and still use ranging reticle in a combat type situation, or crank it up for mil dot type ranging.

Shoot, you can even use the 3-9x40mm versions with TMR reticle and put a flip up lens cap on the objective.  With it down the red dot is still on and you can use it as a both eye open occluded eye dot.  Lightning quick.  Flip the cap up and you have a magnifier scope up to 9x with full mil-dot reticle and mil-rad turret adjustments.  That's what I run and like that a lot.
10/27/2013 2:39:21 PM EDT
[#17]

Quote History
Quoted:


Why not the best of both worlds and use a low power variable with an illuminated red dot?  Leupold has a low power variable in a 1" tube in its Mark AR Mod 1 series and a 30mm with better glass and more elevation in its VX-R Patrol series.  You can leave it cranked down and still use ranging reticle in a combat type situation, or crank it up for mil dot type ranging.



Shoot, you can even use the 3-9x40mm versions with TMR reticle and put a flip up lens cap on the objective.  With it down the red dot is still on and you can use it as a both eye open occluded eye dot.  Lightning quick.  Flip the cap up and you have a magnifier scope up to 9x with full mil-dot reticle and mil-rad turret adjustments.  That's what I run and like that a lot.
View Quote
I dislike eye relief and scope shadow on a "fighting" gun unless its an ACOG, but for hunting I dont mind.

 
10/27/2013 4:12:18 PM EDT
[#18]
ACOG TA-11

Excellent eye relief and just a damn sturdy and good scope.
That must be the reason the military issues it.


10/27/2013 4:31:34 PM EDT
[#19]
see thats what im thinking of but with a micro in offset so that there is zero sacrifice of speed at short distance...

http://soldiersystems.net/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/kryptek_patrol_01.jpg
10/27/2013 4:37:55 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote History
Quoted:
see thats what im thinking of but with a micro in offset so that there is zero sacrifice of speed at short distance...

http://soldiersystems.net/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/kryptek_patrol_01.jpg
View Quote


you can also mount an RMR on top of the acog..
10/27/2013 4:46:58 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Quoted:


you can also mount an RMR on top of the acog..
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
see thats what im thinking of but with a micro in offset so that there is zero sacrifice of speed at short distance...

http://soldiersystems.net/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/kryptek_patrol_01.jpg


you can also mount an RMR on top of the acog..




Or place a front lens cap over the ACOG and leave it closed to use it as a CQB optic similar to the Armson OEG.
10/27/2013 5:34:48 PM EDT
[#22]
i think the whole point of running two optics is so that you dont have to take your hand off the gun to adjust or change anything.  How isn't that better than a 1-X variable?  Not to mention battery life sucks on variables as opposed to no batteries and 5 years of the acog and aimpoint respectively...
10/27/2013 5:42:06 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote History
Quoted:
i think the whole point of running two optics is so that you dont have to take your hand off the gun to adjust or change anything.  How isn't that better than a 1-X variable?  Not to mention battery life sucks on variables as opposed to no batteries and 5 years of the acog and aimpoint respectively...
View Quote


takes me less than a second to switch from 1x to 4x and plus my elcan has backup iron sights on top so it works pretty well for me.. i had the TA11 ACOG before switching to my current setup.. as far as battery life, i dont illuminate it unless its dark or in low light conditions or when using NV which really doesnt drain it too much since its so dim
10/27/2013 5:53:08 PM EDT
[#24]
so youre saying it can be just as fast to take your hand off the gun, switch magnifications, put your hand back on the gun, and acquire sight picture as it would to rotate the rifle and obtain sight picture, or are you saying its fast enough for you?  What i am thinking is that sure, less than a second maybe .75 seconds?  People can get at least three shots off in that time.  I think being able to cut out half a second in that situation is huge, not to mention maintain control of the rifle the entire time
10/27/2013 5:59:10 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote History
Quoted:
so youre saying it can be just as fast to take your hand off the gun, switch magnifications, put your hand back on the gun, and acquire sight picture as it would to rotate the rifle and obtain sight picture, or are you saying its fast enough for you?  What i am thinking is that sure, less than a second maybe .75 seconds?  People can get at least three shots off in that time.  I think being able to cut out half a second in that situation is huge, not to mention maintain control of the rifle the entire time
View Quote


well my hand never leaves the gun.. my off hand (my left) is what switches the lever from 1x to 4x while i am still looking down the scope sustaining my cheek wield and my right hand is still on the grip ready to fire.. so i would say its just as fast.. and if theyre that close to where i need 1x i would just use the iron sights on top which is faster than rotating and reacquiring your target.. to each their own..
10/28/2013 5:21:10 AM EDT
[#26]

Quote History
Quoted:
you can also mount an RMR on top of the acog..
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

see thats what im thinking of but with a micro in offset so that there is zero sacrifice of speed at short distance...



http://soldiersystems.net/blog1/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/kryptek_patrol_01.jpg




you can also mount an RMR on top of the acog..
+q Which is the way I would do it cause it makes the red dot ambi.

 
10/28/2013 5:23:31 AM EDT
[#27]

Quote History
Quoted:


so youre saying it can be just as fast to take your hand off the gun, switch magnifications, put your hand back on the gun, and acquire sight picture as it would to rotate the rifle and obtain sight picture, or are you saying its fast enough for you?  What i am thinking is that sure, less than a second maybe .75 seconds?  People can get at least three shots off in that time.  I think being able to cut out half a second in that situation is huge, not to mention maintain control of the rifle the entire time
View Quote
Training!

 



IMO it's slower to change from 1-4 on a scope, but guys who practice a lot and shoot a lot make it fast.
10/29/2013 2:03:48 PM EDT
[#28]
i can't see how running two optics wouldn't be superior to just one variable optic.  I mean cmon, don't they make you run in an entirely different class in 3 gun when you do that?  Probably means theres an advantage to doing that...wouldn't that mean that acog+red dot in an offset would trump a variable by itself?
10/29/2013 2:21:55 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote History
Quoted:
Training!  

IMO it's slower to change from 1-4 on a scope, but guys who practice a lot and shoot a lot make it fast.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
so youre saying it can be just as fast to take your hand off the gun, switch magnifications, put your hand back on the gun, and acquire sight picture as it would to rotate the rifle and obtain sight picture, or are you saying its fast enough for you?  What i am thinking is that sure, less than a second maybe .75 seconds?  People can get at least three shots off in that time.  I think being able to cut out half a second in that situation is huge, not to mention maintain control of the rifle the entire time
Training!  

IMO it's slower to change from 1-4 on a scope, but guys who practice a lot and shoot a lot make it fast.


maybe on a traditional variable scope where you turn a dial, but on the elcan its a lever you just move forward and back which is incredibly fast
10/29/2013 5:30:02 PM EDT
[#30]

Quote History
Quoted:
maybe on a traditional variable scope where you turn a dial, but on the elcan its a lever you just move forward and back which is incredibly fast
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:

so youre saying it can be just as fast to take your hand off the gun, switch magnifications, put your hand back on the gun, and acquire sight picture as it would to rotate the rifle and obtain sight picture, or are you saying its fast enough for you?  What i am thinking is that sure, less than a second maybe .75 seconds?  People can get at least three shots off in that time.  I think being able to cut out half a second in that situation is huge, not to mention maintain control of the rifle the entire time
Training!  



IMO it's slower to change from 1-4 on a scope, but guys who practice a lot and shoot a lot make it fast.





maybe on a traditional variable scope where you turn a dial, but on the elcan its a lever you just move forward and back which is incredibly fast
I see what you mean, but you are still taking your support hand off the gun.

 



Like I said it boils down to the person and how much they practice with the set-up they have.
10/29/2013 5:49:14 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote History
Quoted:
I see what you mean, but you are still taking your support hand off the gun.  

Like I said it boils down to the person and how much they practice with the set-up they have.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
so youre saying it can be just as fast to take your hand off the gun, switch magnifications, put your hand back on the gun, and acquire sight picture as it would to rotate the rifle and obtain sight picture, or are you saying its fast enough for you?  What i am thinking is that sure, less than a second maybe .75 seconds?  People can get at least three shots off in that time.  I think being able to cut out half a second in that situation is huge, not to mention maintain control of the rifle the entire time
Training!  

IMO it's slower to change from 1-4 on a scope, but guys who practice a lot and shoot a lot make it fast.


maybe on a traditional variable scope where you turn a dial, but on the elcan its a lever you just move forward and back which is incredibly fast
I see what you mean, but you are still taking your support hand off the gun.  

Like I said it boils down to the person and how much they practice with the set-up they have.


agreed..
10/29/2013 8:58:57 PM EDT
[#32]
Wouldn't running a variable and a red dot be ridiculously heavy? Turning a handy lightweight carbine into something that weighs as much as a SAW doesn't sound fun or fast to me.
10/30/2013 2:01:23 AM EDT
[#33]
Aimpoint for fighting rifle. Scope for hunting.
10/30/2013 5:14:49 AM EDT
[#34]


Quote History
Quoted:



Wouldn't running a variable and a red dot be ridiculously heavy? Turning a handy lightweight carbine into something that weighs as much as a SAW doesn't sound fun or fast to me.
View Quote
That is a ridiculous comparison, cause the M249 SAW weighs 17 pounds unloaded.

 






The heaviest/best AR15's in 5.56 that are setup for fighting is the Sopmod Block II which weighs around 12 pounds with optics/lights/lasers. Now 12 pounds loaded is very heavy imo for a 5.56 carbine, but the guys who have them say it balances very well.







For someone like me and you I can see how a variable with a red dot can add well over a pound, but it wont be "ridiculous" like you said. My AR with a scope weighs 11 pounds and if you add a small RMR red dot it would be like 11.4 pounds.




Once again it boils down to training and also working out with your carbine like hiking or hunting.

 
10/30/2013 5:15:02 AM EDT
[#35]

Quote History
Quoted:


Aimpoint for fighting rifle. Scope for hunting.
View Quote
+1

 
10/30/2013 9:51:46 AM EDT
[#36]
I feel as though although low variable are good at close quarters/defensive situations, wouldn't want something that is great such as a t1?  But what if you also want something that you can reach out with?  Like say for instance someone in asscrackistan...they need to shoot far, but they may need to shoot close.  They dont want to have to keep switching optics, but def want to make sure they have the best setup for every scenario.  Does that mean running two optics?  Variables def sacrifice a little bit at close quarters, maybe not much, but that little bit is huge considering close quarters engagements are far more crucial part to make sure you are well equiped.
10/30/2013 2:50:47 PM EDT
[#37]
The paratrooper M249 weighs 15 pounds. It was an exaggeration of course. I apologize if that wasn't clear. The point remains though - big rail system, light, laser, 2 optics, etc makes for quite a heavy carbine - effectively nullifying part of the purpose of having a carbine in the first place in my opinion. My M4 in Afghanistan weighed as much as the paratrooper SAW I was assigned. But it had a light, PEQ-15, M203 (where most of it came from), and a Leupold 2.5-8 MR/T on it.
10/30/2013 2:54:03 PM EDT
[#38]

Quote History
Quoted:


The paratrooper M249 weighs 15 pounds. It was an exaggeration of course. I apologize if that wasn't clear. The point remains though - big rail system, light, laser, 2 optics, etc makes for quite a heavy carbine - effectively nullifying part of the purpose of having a carbine in the first place in my opinion. My M4 in Afghanistan weighed as much as the paratrooper SAW I was assigned. But it had a light, PEQ-15, M203 (where most of it came from), and a Leupold 2.5-8 MR/T on it.
View Quote
I agree which is why I suggested to just use an Aimpoint and thats it for 0-300 yards.

 
10/30/2013 4:51:41 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote History
Quoted:
Leupold Mark 8 CQBSS 1x8
View Quote



Why is this optic so expensive?!?

http://www.amazon.com/Leupold-CQBSS-1-1-8x24-Rifle-112564/dp/B0066AUZPI/ref=pd_sim_sbs_sg_2

10/30/2013 4:58:51 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote History
Quoted:



Why is this optic so expensive?!?

http://www.amazon.com/Leupold-CQBSS-1-1-8x24-Rifle-112564/dp/B0066AUZPI/ref=pd_sim_sbs_sg_2

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Leupold Mark 8 CQBSS 1x8



Why is this optic so expensive?!?

http://www.amazon.com/Leupold-CQBSS-1-1-8x24-Rifle-112564/dp/B0066AUZPI/ref=pd_sim_sbs_sg_2



the glass is pretty nice but the FOV is horrible.. used one this weekend..
10/30/2013 6:12:34 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote History
Quoted:
+1  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Aimpoint for fighting rifle. Scope for hunting.
+1  


Yup

Or if you are in open terrain where a likely fighting distance is greater than 300 meters. Then I prefer 308 and some magnification. What is "best" always "depends"

So the right answer is of course get both.
10/31/2013 6:35:28 PM EDT
[#42]
if I only need magnification when I take my gun out to the range or desert, would I be better off just getting a variable of some sort and then running it and my t1 on a qd mount?
11/1/2013 3:20:37 AM EDT
[#43]
I use Aimpoints in a LT129 mount and have a flip to side magnifier with qd mount so I can use it on several rifles.  I like this set up a lot.

This rifle isn't in this current formation but the optics set up is the same

11/15/2013 3:11:27 PM EDT
[#44]
16.4% was convincing enough for me. Check it out.



Clearing my house with it and I love it. Trying it out on Sunday. I'll let y'all know how it goes.
11/16/2013 10:42:57 AM EDT
[#45]

Quote History
Quoted:


if I only need magnification when I take my gun out to the range or desert, would I be better off just getting a variable of some sort and then running it and my t1 on a qd mount?
View Quote
Stick with your ACOG/T1 combo since variables are mostly ran at the lowest and highest mag.

 
11/16/2013 1:58:02 PM EDT
[#46]
None of the Above... Elcan for the WIN!!!

11/16/2013 3:14:26 PM EDT
[#47]
From looking at the responses here, it is apparent few understand what a "fighting carbine" is.
11/17/2013 5:26:55 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote History
Quoted:
None of the Above... Elcan for the WIN!!!

<a href="http://s191.photobucket.com/user/RugerDuger/media/2ffe6ac8-6995-4b34-9b88-31323b72e43c.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z137/RugerDuger/2ffe6ac8-6995-4b34-9b88-31323b72e43c.jpg</a>
View Quote


Enjoy that one year warranty and short battery life! Elcans are sweet though
11/17/2013 6:54:25 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote History
Quoted:


Enjoy that one year warranty and short battery life! Elcans are sweet though
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
None of the Above... Elcan for the WIN!!!

<a href="http://s191.photobucket.com/user/RugerDuger/media/2ffe6ac8-6995-4b34-9b88-31323b72e43c.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z137/RugerDuger/2ffe6ac8-6995-4b34-9b88-31323b72e43c.jpg</a>


Enjoy that one year warranty and short battery life! Elcans are sweet though


Neither concern me.
11/17/2013 10:24:59 AM EDT
[#50]
Mark 6 1-6 or TA33 for 16in depending on how much weight you feel like.















XPS or T-1 for SBR.
Previous Page
/ 3
Next Page

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - best optic setup (Page 1 of 3)

AR Sponsor