Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
2/22/2008 2:24:20 PM EDT
Im a about to purchase a EOTECH 550 seris model, do I need an optical mount or does it come ready to mount on flat top? What are the differences between the difference between more expensive models to the slightly cheaper models? Just battery and night vision compatablility?
2/22/2008 2:29:56 PM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:
Im a about to purchase a EOTECH 550 seris model, do I need an optical mount or does it come ready to mount on flat top? What are the differences between the difference between more expensive models to the slightly cheaper models? Just battery and night vision compatablility?


Eotech's come with an internal mount that mounts directly onto flattops. u are also correct about the price differences in models
2/22/2008 2:33:19 PM EDT
[#2]
Yes. All EOTech come ready to mount right to the rail.

Short rule of thumb:

51x = Civvie. No Night Vision. Not warrantied for more than 10feet of water, etc.

55x = Military Grade. Night Vision. 66ft. submersible (I think).

511/551 = N Cell. Standard Mount
512/552 = AA Cell. Standard Mount
553 = CR123 Cell. Dual ARMS mount
555 = AA Cell. Dual ARMS mount
516/556 = CR123. Raised Standard Mount
557 = AA Cell. Raised Standard Mount. 62gr M4 ballistic reticle

There are a few other colors, reticles, etc. but these are the basics.
2/22/2008 2:34:05 PM EDT
[#3]
I had the N cell but traded it for the AA. Unless you plan on night vision, don't worry about the NV model. No advantage at all. Mine mounts directly to the flat top.
2/22/2008 2:35:10 PM EDT
[#4]
I found this to be a handy little chart.

-Chris

http://photos.imageevent.com/smglee/cltactical/huge/EOT-workchart.jpg
2/22/2008 2:35:42 PM EDT
[#5]
551/552/553/557 night vision compatable
511/512 no night vision compat.
511/551 n battery(less life)200 hours
512/552/557 aa battery(more life)1,000 hours
553 2 123 lith batteries 1100 hours
553 quick release throw levers

hope this helps
2/22/2008 4:44:01 PM EDT
[#6]
yes they mount directly....also available area  number oif after market mounts to elevate the optic....I have a yankee hill  eo tech platform for sale if  you dont like the optic sitting so low....
2/22/2008 8:11:05 PM EDT
[#7]
FORGET THE NV STUFF!!!  have any of you EVER actually heard of someone lookin through a *dern* eotech with NV googles???  NO, that's what IR lasers are for.  SAVE YOURSELF SOME MONEY and get the non-nightvision model.
2/22/2008 10:12:14 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
FORGET THE NV STUFF!!!  have any of you EVER actually heard of someone lookin through a *dern* eotech with NV googles???  NO, that's what IR lasers are for.  SAVE YOURSELF SOME MONEY and get the non-nightvision model.


I have, it's a troubling thing when your PAQ4 goes down due to a pressure switch going tits up and you can't remove the laser to flip out the control lever (good thing it was only training).  Also mounting the NODs behind or in front of the sight during a long OP.  But then again thats just my experience.  But if all you are going to do is shoot paper then this really isn't much of a issue.
2/23/2008 4:44:19 AM EDT
[#9]
Has anyone had any experience with the 553 with the ARMS levers?  Is there a major difference between the ARMS levers  mount and a LaRue mount?
2/23/2008 5:35:35 AM EDT
[#10]
Personally, I wouldn't waste my money on any mount. The OEM moun t system is great and can be unscrewed wit a coin. I got the 552 but wish I would have saved my $$$ and got the 512 instead. It is a great sight, but NV? I should have just built an IR laser system when/if I can ever afford NV.
2/23/2008 8:11:32 AM EDT
[#11]
What's the best price you've seen on the 512, lately?
2/23/2008 8:38:10 AM EDT
[#12]
I just ordered one a 512 from Bravo company for $377 and ordered some mags so I would get free shipping they offer with orders over $400
2/23/2008 9:54:05 AM EDT
[#13]
$377 seems to be the going rate..
2/23/2008 10:39:20 AM EDT
[#14]
I have aimpoint and eotech 551

I went with the NV model 551 because I didnt like the 11 like SCREW HOLES ALL OVER IT and only good to 10ft of water

so I went with the NV model 551

If I run DURACELL N it will run 100% with no trouble

But I had trouble useing ENERGIZERS

3 times I found it DEAD with New batts install


I wish I got the model with 123battery type I think its a 553 model


I also like mine mounted as is on my LMT M4 14.5 FLAT TOP
2/23/2008 10:40:22 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
I had the N cell but traded it for the AA. Unless you plan on night vision, don't worry about the NV model. No advantage at all. Mine mounts directly to the flat top.


The advantage is that its BETTER water proofing
instead of just 10foot only
2/23/2008 10:47:08 AM EDT
[#16]
It looks like all but the 553 are water resistent up to 33ft.  Am I wrong?
2/23/2008 11:53:15 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
FORGET THE NV STUFF!!!  have any of you EVER actually heard of someone lookin through a *dern* eotech with NV googles???  NO, that's what IR lasers are for.  SAVE YOURSELF SOME MONEY and get the non-nightvision model.


..ahem!  

Works phenomenally well too, FWIW.  A lot easier to aim with the EO reticle at long range than the IR laser.
2/23/2008 11:56:57 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
It looks like all but the 553 are water resistent up to 33ft.  Am I wrong?


should be better than the REGULAR type that CANT HANDLE over 10FEET of H2O
2/23/2008 12:18:44 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:

Quoted:
It looks like all but the 553 are water resistant up to 33ft.  Am I wrong?


should be better than the REGULAR type that CANT HANDLE over 10FEET of H2O


Damn, there goes my deep sea hunting safari, and I hope that any boating accidents happen in shallow water.
2/23/2008 1:54:49 PM EDT
[#20]
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
It looks like all but the 553 are water resistant up to 33ft.  Am I wrong?


should be better than the REGULAR type that CANT HANDLE over 10FEET of H2O


Damn, there goes my deep sea hunting safari, and I hope that any boating accidents happen in shallow water.Your right.....I guess when you put it like that it doesn't really make a difference. I've got to imagine I will never be wading through water with my AR wondering why I didn't just spend the extra money.  
2/23/2008 3:02:41 PM EDT
[#21]
Wound up selling my 512 because of short battery life (Energizer lithiums and Duracells) and the fact that it would drain batteries when turned off.  Went back to an Aimpoint.
2/23/2008 9:50:24 PM EDT
[#22]
height=8
Quoted:
Wound up selling my 512 because of short battery life (Energizer lithiums and Duracells) and the fact that it would drain batteries when turned off.  Went back to an Aimpoint.


? it's been my experience that cco's/aimpoints have WAY shorter battery life than eotechs.  and one more question, everyone here(ar15.com) swears by aimpoints, but all of my nco's say that CCO's ARE GARBAGE.  anyone care to chip in??
2/23/2008 9:53:16 PM EDT
[#23]
height=8
Quoted:
I have aimpoint and eotech 551

I went with the NV model 551 because I didnt like the 11 like SCREW HOLES ALL OVER IT and only good to 10ft of water



are you really going to go diving 10 feet underwater before you go to the paper target range???  NO.  as long as it is waterproof enough to keep out the rain or an accidental drop in a mud puddle YOU ARE FINE.
2/23/2008 11:12:17 PM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Wound up selling my 512 because of short battery life (Energizer lithiums and Duracells) and the fact that it would drain batteries when turned off.  Went back to an Aimpoint.


? it's been my experience that cco's/aimpoints have WAY shorter battery life than eotechs.  

551 eotech - 200 hours
553 eotech - 1100 hours
M2 aimpoint - 10,000 hours
M3 aimpoint - 50,000 hours
M4 aimpoint - 80,000 hours

Even if you look at an older M2, probably the cco you're referring to, it was rated 10,000 hours on a med setting. Even assuming the max setting might cut it down to even 25% of that, it's still 2500 hours and eotechs with cr123s or lithium AAs are rated at 1100.

I like things about the eotechs, especially the ret, but I'm selling my 551 in favor of an M3. The last set of n-cells I put in had the unit flashing right away. So I put in new batteries and I don't even know if I could trust the thing to last a week of heavy use if I needed it to. I'll be able to leave the M3 on for years.

I know it's not 'fair' to compare the battery life of the weakest eotech with the much more expensive M3. If I would have gotten another eotech, it would have been the 516 or 553 probably, and I VERY nearly did go that route. Either should be a very good optic. I may even get this aimpoint and hate it, who knows. I will forever steer clear of the 5x1 models though.
2/24/2008 8:08:38 PM EDT
[#25]
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
Wound up selling my 512 because of short battery life (Energizer lithiums and Duracells) and the fact that it would drain batteries when turned off.  Went back to an Aimpoint.


? it's been my experience that cco's/aimpoints have WAY shorter battery life than eotechs.  

551 eotech - 200 hours
553 eotech - 1100 hours
M2 aimpoint - 10,000 hours
M3 aimpoint - 50,000 hours
M4 aimpoint - 80,000 hours

Even if you look at an older M2, probably the cco you're referring to, it was rated 10,000 hours on a med setting. Even assuming the max setting might cut it down to even 25% of that, it's still 2500 hours and eotechs with cr123s or lithium AAs are rated at 1100.

I like things about the eotechs, especially the ret, but I'm selling my 551 in favor of an M3. The last set of n-cells I put in had the unit flashing right away. So I put in new batteries and I don't even know if I could trust the thing to last a week of heavy use if I needed it to. I'll be able to leave the M3 on for years.

I know it's not 'fair' to compare the battery life of the weakest eotech with the much more expensive M3. If I would have gotten another eotech, it would have been the 516 or 553 probably, and I VERY nearly did go that route. Either should be a very good optic. I may even get this aimpoint and hate it, who knows. I will forever steer clear of the 5x1 models though.


the specs might say that, but i have personally seen aimpoint batteries go bad just from leaving them on OVERNIGHT, which is definately less than 80,000 hours if i did my math correctly.
2/25/2008 6:49:48 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Wound up selling my 512 because of short battery life (Energizer lithiums and Duracells) and the fact that it would drain batteries when turned off.  Went back to an Aimpoint.


? it's been my experience that cco's/aimpoints have WAY shorter battery life than eotechs.  

551 eotech - 200 hours
553 eotech - 1100 hours
M2 aimpoint - 10,000 hours
M3 aimpoint - 50,000 hours
M4 aimpoint - 80,000 hours

Even if you look at an older M2, probably the cco you're referring to, it was rated 10,000 hours on a med setting. Even assuming the max setting might cut it down to even 25% of that, it's still 2500 hours and eotechs with cr123s or lithium AAs are rated at 1100.

I like things about the eotechs, especially the ret, but I'm selling my 551 in favor of an M3. The last set of n-cells I put in had the unit flashing right away. So I put in new batteries and I don't even know if I could trust the thing to last a week of heavy use if I needed it to. I'll be able to leave the M3 on for years.

I know it's not 'fair' to compare the battery life of the weakest eotech with the much more expensive M3. If I would have gotten another eotech, it would have been the 516 or 553 probably, and I VERY nearly did go that route. Either should be a very good optic. I may even get this aimpoint and hate it, who knows. I will forever steer clear of the 5x1 models though.


the specs might say that, but i have personally seen aimpoint batteries go bad just from leaving them on OVERNIGHT, which is definately less than 80,000 hours if i did my math correctly.

Then I'd say something was just seriously wrong with whatever unit/s did that, since no one else has reported such problems and people often leave them on for months/years.
2/25/2008 7:12:38 PM EDT
[#27]
The Eotech, if turned on with the ^ button, will turn on and stay on for 8 hours, then turn off automatically.  If turned on with the v button, it stays on 4 hours, then turns off automatically.

If it is killing your batteries there is something wrong with it.  Simply box it up and send it in for repair.  They'll fix it.
2/26/2008 4:17:44 AM EDT
[#28]
In addition to what A_Free_Man posted the EOTech shut off time will reset anytime you adjust the brightness.   So if you adjust the brightness in that 4-8 hour period your shut off timer will move up.

The auto shut off will only be an issue if you never adjust your brightness settings.  At least for me, I find that I've always adjusted my brightness sometime within 8 hours so I've never had a auto-shut off issue.
2/26/2008 7:43:19 PM EDT
[#29]
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
height=8
Quoted:
Wound up selling my 512 because of short battery life (Energizer lithiums and Duracells) and the fact that it would drain batteries when turned off.  Went back to an Aimpoint.


? it's been my experience that cco's/aimpoints have WAY shorter battery life than eotechs.  

551 eotech - 200 hours
553 eotech - 1100 hours
M2 aimpoint - 10,000 hours
M3 aimpoint - 50,000 hours
M4 aimpoint - 80,000 hours

Even if you look at an older M2, probably the cco you're referring to, it was rated 10,000 hours on a med setting. Even assuming the max setting might cut it down to even 25% of that, it's still 2500 hours and eotechs with cr123s or lithium AAs are rated at 1100.

I like things about the eotechs, especially the ret, but I'm selling my 551 in favor of an M3. The last set of n-cells I put in had the unit flashing right away. So I put in new batteries and I don't even know if I could trust the thing to last a week of heavy use if I needed it to. I'll be able to leave the M3 on for years.

I know it's not 'fair' to compare the battery life of the weakest eotech with the much more expensive M3. If I would have gotten another eotech, it would have been the 516 or 553 probably, and I VERY nearly did go that route. Either should be a very good optic. I may even get this aimpoint and hate it, who knows. I will forever steer clear of the 5x1 models though.


the specs might say that, but i have personally seen aimpoint batteries go bad just from leaving them on OVERNIGHT, which is definately less than 80,000 hours if i did my math correctly.

Then I'd say something was just seriously wrong with whatever unit/s did that, since no one else has reported such problems and people often leave them on for months/years.


i'm not trying to be an @$$hole here man, but you are going to be disappointed!  go to iraq with an aimpoint and ONE set of batteries, i GUARANTEE YOU WOULDN'T!!!  on a medium setting YOU CAN NOT LEAVE AN AIMPOINT ON FOR MONTHS/YEARS.  I PROMISE.
2/26/2008 8:10:06 PM EDT
[#30]
I've heard the 10,000 hours for the M2 is not always the case over there, maybe the heat has something to do with it?  Seems most Aimpoints that get left on in the comfort of North American safes live up to these 10,000, 20,000 hours claims

Or maybe the batteries that Aimpoint (the company) ships the Aimpoints with are better than the issued ones?
AR Sponsor