Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
6/24/2007 7:54:48 AM EDT
Received my GRSC Scope today. These are my initial unbiased impressions based only on the fit/finish/quality. The scope came with some fairly easy to understand directions, though sighting in was recommended 2" low at 25 yards since the optic sits about 2" over the bore. Zeroing using a 4x magnification since this would make your target easiest to see but not necessary since the scope is designed around first focal plane such that at all levels the BDC will hold true. The reticule looks very crisp, glass is bright and clear. However upon removing the adjustment knob covers I personally didn't like the cam layout. Instead of a precise dot for basing your initial adjustments, it looks like someone just peened a dot on the threads of the cap for reference. I did not like that the numbers spun so easily on the knob but they are independent of the knob itself as the knob is locked for each increment accordingly. Could have been better designed in this area alone but once zeroed isn't necessary to adjust windage or elevation since the BDC and windage holdover is built right into the reticule itself. But being able to lock the reference points would be a nice addition if going from 62 gr to say a 77gr and back again. Perhaps a set up a little closer to a traditional tactical style knob would have been better- eliminating the caps altogether but not necessary with this style of optic since you primarily set it and forget it. However as Ed explained each aiming point corresponding to 250 meters, 300 meters, 400 meters, and 500 meters is to correspond to a circle around a mans head at those distance. If you actually were aiming at his head then you might hit him in the eye with a 62gr, hit him in the chin with a 77 grain or blow the top of his head clean off with a 55 gr. Course most people will just use the head to range and then aim for center mass.

At 1x versus 4x power you can tell a slight variation in the FOV focus remedied by adjusting your focus ring until finding a happy medium between all levels throughout the zoom range. Overall I hope this scope does perform well, perhaps the best part is the reticule that Ed designed and his extremely well thought out 1st focal plane reticule adjustment. Basically as you zoom, your reticule gets larger and vice versa this way you know that the BDC reticule holds true for 1x-4x. After talking with Ed is surprised me to know that so many big name companies have refused to even take a look at his idea. This reticule is faster to range than an ACOG, Valdada, Swarovski, Nightforce, Leupold, etc. All other manufacturers install sniper style reticules being marketed as CQB while ignoring the fact that 1st focal plane and BDC built into the reticule that is caliber specific is the way to go. Most other companies go with a 2nd focal plane, with ranging estimations and ballistic cams requiring the end user to physically adjust the cams. Ed designed a set it and forget it optic that once zeroed is good to go out to 500 meters requiring no adjustments needed for the elevation whatsoever.

Overall for price and quality I feel the GRSC is a good buy if not the best buy considering what else is out there for the money. Time will prove on the optic itself but most here bought this scope for the reticule pattern alone. I hope in time a big name company can make one of these to Ed's spec which is over twenty years in the making. In my estimation this would be perfect on a 1x6 Swarovski in 1st focal plane.

Just my .02,


C77
6/25/2007 10:18:19 AM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:
The Swarovski is a better scope but not the way it is designed for a true battle scope. They have the right scope being a 1x-6x capable of adding a combat reticule but built it with a 2nd focal plane. Basically Swarovski spent five years doing research to build something not yet available in the industry- a true 1x-6x power variable optic. However they dropped the ball yet again, producing the optic with a 2nd focal plane reticule that doesn't offer BDC or ranging ability. So yes, they built the best platform but failed at the close.  

Overall I'd say the GRSC optic should work perfectly, even know a friend whose taking one to the sandbox because he liked the reticule layout better than an ACOG and the fact he can keep it on 1x for CQB work. I still can't believe that the big name companies wouldn't even consider a true battle style reticule over their slower sniper style range finding reticules that require the end user to adjust the cams instead of just using the sight. Valdada ripped off part of Ed's design with the CQB reticule but didn't do it correctly as they insisted to keep the pattern on the 2nd focal plane- again, making it useless in a variable power scope.

Until another company sees the light, the GRSC might be the best option for a vaiarable power battle optic that has a BDC reticule that can be used at all zoom levels. Overall I'd say it's worth owning, the same proto-types were also produced by US optics and as Ed explained, would have cost four times more for the exact same thing. I just wish Valdada would pick up the contract or perhaps Swarovski but until then I guess we get a nice optic for the money. Basically when you get your scope, if you have questions- just ask Ed, the guy explaines everything very well. He even purposely put the eye relief distance greater than an ACOG so soldiers don't hit their helmets on the damn things. He even tried to tell Glyn Bindon before he completed the ACOG that his reticule pattern wasn't a true battle optic since it required the user to measure off the chest plate instead of the head as seen with the GRSC since most enemies don't give you a full view of their body during combat.


C77


IOR also makes a 6x zoom scopes in the 35mm line.  Scott from Liberty Optics has talked IOR into making the 3x18 scope to a FFP scope.  It would be nice if he also did this to their 1.5x8-26, but make it in a 1x6 scope.  Ed may want to contact Scott at Liberty Optics.
AR Sponsor