Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
8/6/2006 6:44:41 AM EDT
I have a Bushmaster 24" flat top upper that I am setting up for prairie dogs.

Wondering what type of glass I should mount on it.  Leupold 4.5-14x50? 6.5-20x50? VXIII or Mk4 LR/T?  Other suggestions?

Planning on Larue QD rings.

Thanks,

Chris
8/8/2006 10:05:58 AM EDT
[#1]
Just got a Leupold 4.5-14X50MM with the Varmint Recticle for my beaver/groundhog setup. It should be in on Thursday so i will post some pictures. Any of the scopes you are looking at will be fine. I just really have no need for anything bigger than what i got.
8/8/2006 10:24:30 AM EDT
[#2]
I have always been disapointed in paying for the high magnification and not using it on my pd scopes.  Between the mirage  and the need to spot targets and hits, I have rarely ever used anything above 16x and usually been happy with 12-14x.
8/8/2006 11:41:09 AM EDT
[#3]
The IOR 4-14x50 gives the Leupold line a run for their money.  Excellent, excellent glass at a better price.

IOR 4-14x50 @ SWFA

8/8/2006 1:23:37 PM EDT
[#4]
Since PD shooting conditions typically involve long ranges, wind and mirage, some people have issues with high magnification scopes.

In my experience, having the gun recoil straight back is a great advantage. You can often see the bullet impact even on higher-recoiling guns with the scope cranked up if the gun does not recoil off-target.

The 223 runs out of steam at 350-400 yards. You can still hit them at longer ranges, though the "chunkage factor" drops to zero. At 350 yards and beyond, a solid hit just knocks them over.

Assuming you will limit your shots to 350 yards and under, a 14X scope should do just fine.

Personally, I like more magnification. When the mirage gets bad I will crank my scopes down to about 16X. Rarely do I go lower.
8/8/2006 2:39:13 PM EDT
[#5]
IT'S HARD TO BEAT A BIG NIGHTFORCE NXS WITH NP-R2 RETICLE:



WES GRANT
M.S.T.N.
8/8/2006 3:05:47 PM EDT
[#6]
You don't need big glass for p-dogs. I've done both Super Sniper fixed 10x and an aimpoint. They both were lacking when it came down to field performance. The past two years I've had a leupy 1-5X and I beieve it might be the ultimate for AR's with 14.5" barrels. With a longer 20-24" you should look really close at the Night Force 2.5-10X I doubt if there is a better scope for AR's made than the NF one. I don't know were you shoot p-dogs but around here the action can be from 5 yards out to 500+. You need fine crosshairs, good trigger and a solid rest alot more than you need a huge magnification scope.


8/27/2006 7:47:52 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
Since PD shooting conditions typically involve long ranges, wind and mirage, some people have issues with high magnification scopes.

In my experience, having the gun recoil straight back is a great advantage. You can often see the bullet impact even on higher-recoiling guns with the scope cranked up if the gun does not recoil off-target.

The 223 runs out of steam at 350-400 yards. You can still hit them at longer ranges, though the "chunkage factor" drops to zero. At 350 yards and beyond, a solid hit just knocks them over.

Assuming you will limit your shots to 350 yards and under, a 14X scope should do just fine.

Personally, I like more magnification. When the mirage gets bad I will crank my scopes down to about 16X. Rarely do I go lower.


I have a 20x scope on my Bushy Varminter and do not have problems with losing my target during recoil

Video
8/28/2006 5:39:12 PM EDT
[#8]
I have been using a 4-12x on my Bushy Varminter for p-dogs and it works great!
I do most of my shooting of p-dogs between 150 and 450 yards, so a higher magnification is preferred, but as it has been said before, too much magnification and it sucks, IMO I wouldn't go above 20x, and get something variable.
AR Sponsor