Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
12/6/2005 6:53:20 PM EDT
Saving for a Trijicon 21 1.5-4x or ACOG
Pros/cons of each?
12/6/2005 7:24:28 PM EDT
[#1]
I hear from reliable contact in the in the USMC that the Amber is out performing the Red in all light environments tests.

Mike @ CSGW

www.csgunworks.com
[email protected]

Here’s some testimonials about CS GunWorks for AR15 Board
What do YOU have to say about CS GunWorks
12/6/2005 7:36:58 PM EDT
[#2]
After using both the red is much easier for me to see and use.  It seems its an individual thing.  I suggest trying both.  
12/6/2005 8:04:33 PM EDT
[#3]
I perfer red. Try both if you can.
12/6/2005 8:47:43 PM EDT
[#4]
In night vision environments, over long periods of behind the scope, the amber is the clear winner with less eye fatigue.  It's a comfortable color for ones eye.  Hope this helps.

Vic
12/6/2005 11:45:00 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
In night vision environments, over long periods of behind the scope, the amber is the clear winner with less eye fatigue.  It's a comfortable color for ones eye.  Hope this helps.

Vic



True statement.  Our eyes are optimally focused for yellow light in the wavelength spectrum.  It falls neatly on the retinal wall.  Blues and violets are the shortest wavelengths and fall short of the retinal wall.  Red light is the longest wavelength, and it is fatigue producing because it falls beyond the retinal wall causing the eye (lens) to work harder to focus it on the retinal wall.  This is especially true of folks that are longer in the tooth, as we develop presbyopia (a hardening of the lens) naturally with age.  This condition requires the eye muscles to work harder to manipulate the lens to see reds clearly...  For example, 40 somethings often find it more difficult to read automobile gauges illuminated in red.  

Edited to add:  my personal preference is Amber - I have a TA 47-2 and have had no issues with it whatsoever
12/10/2005 2:09:36 PM EDT
[#6]
anyone making reticles in blue or green or anything wacky like that?
12/10/2005 2:17:43 PM EDT
[#7]
I have a TA11e (red chevron .308) from Mike @ CS Gunworks.  I live in TX (a lot of prairie), and I don’t have NV - red seemed like the obvious choice for my situation.

(Mike will give you a great price btw; probably better than as advertised on their website; they’ll give you such a good deal you will wonder how they make any $$$!)
12/10/2005 3:18:37 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:
In night vision environments, over long periods of behind the scope, the amber is the clear winner with less eye fatigue.  It's a comfortable color for ones eye.  Hope this helps.

Vic



True statement.  Our eyes are optimally focused for yellow light in the wavelength spectrum.  It falls neatly on the retinal wall.  Blues and violets are the shortest wavelengths and fall short of the retinal wall.  Red light is the longest wavelength, and it is fatigue producing because it falls beyond the retinal wall causing the eye (lens) to work harder to focus it on the retinal wall.  This is especially true of folks that are longer in the tooth, as we develop presbyopia (a hardening of the lens) naturally with age.  This condition requires the eye muscles to work harder to manipulate the lens to see reds clearly...  For example, 40 somethings often find it more difficult to read automobile gauges illuminated in red.  

Edited to add:  my personal preference is Amber - I have a TA 47-2 and have had no issues with it whatsoever



Gosh, you stated this better than I ever would have!! Thanks  
12/10/2005 4:31:37 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
I hear from reliable contact in the in the USMC that the Amber is out performing the Red in all light environments tests.

Mike @ CSGW

Hey Mike, can you elaborate on that statement a bit? What optic are they using that has an amber reticle? I have often wondered why the full sized ACOGs come in red, yet the overwhelming majority of compact ACOGs are amber.
12/10/2005 4:58:43 PM EDT
[#10]
I have both a red dot (AimPoint) and amber (compact ACOG) and the Amber Dot is easier for me to pick up more quickly in all light conditions against all backgrounds.  Then again that's just me.

MadDog
12/10/2005 8:36:40 PM EDT
[#11]
My eyes don't do well with amber reticles. I prefer the red.

My reasoning is this - try using a red reticle in a red lit darkroom. It is doable if the lighting is optimal; but it isn't great. Now what color lighting do you see in most environments here?
12/10/2005 9:03:19 PM EDT
[#12]
i prefer red as well over amber
12/10/2005 9:17:57 PM EDT
[#13]
I like the amber over the red. I've had 2 amber acogs and 1 red one. I now have an amber accupoint. I just seem to get along better with amber.
12/11/2005 4:27:39 AM EDT
[#14]
On several older threads most people liked red. However, I have tried both and I like amber. I used a TA50-4 3.5 power compact with amber crosshairs and use it in the desert and mountains without problems.
12/11/2005 4:30:16 AM EDT
[#15]
I've had very little experince with amber, but I found that I could pick out the red better... best to try for yourself.
12/11/2005 8:34:12 AM EDT
[#16]
i am thinking about converting my ta 31f from red to amber 290 from trijicon
12/11/2005 11:34:45 AM EDT
[#17]



True statement.  Our eyes are optimally focused for yellow light in the wavelength spectrum.  It falls neatly on the retinal wall.  Blues and violets are the shortest wavelengths and fall short of the retinal wall.  Red light is the longest wavelength, and it is fatigue producing because it falls beyond the retinal wall causing the eye (lens) to work harder to focus it on the retinal wall.  This is especially true of folks that are longer in the tooth, as we develop presbyopia (a hardening of the lens) naturally with age.  This condition requires the eye muscles to work harder to manipulate the lens to see reds clearly...  For example, 40 somethings often find it more difficult to read automobile gauges illuminated in red.  

Edited to add:  my personal preference is Amber - I have a TA 47-2 and have had no issues with it whatsoever



Gosh, you stated this better than I ever would have!! Thanks  



Victor:  Sadly, a reflection of 14 years of having to explain limitations of the human eye, dark adaptation, and how night vision works as part of my annual proficiency test as an aviator - the topic is mandatory for the Army Aviation and is one that the Instructor Pilots love to dig into.

Et al:  I agree with Red_5, you have to try each color reticle and see which works best for you individually.  Don't go off of someone else's preferences because your eyes and the environment you expect to use the optic are bound to be different.  It's kinda of like BAC - some people can use it and others cannot no matter how hard they try.  In theory it should work for everyone, but it doesn't.
12/12/2005 10:31:26 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
Victor:  Sadly, a reflection of 14 years of having to explain limitations of the human eye, dark adaptation, and how night vision works as part of my annual proficiency test as an aviator - the topic is mandatory for the Army Aviation and is one that the Instructor Pilots love to dig into.

Et al:  I agree with Red_5, you have to try each color reticle and see which works best for you individually.  Don't go off of someone else's preferences because your eyes and the environment you expect to use the optic are bound to be different.  It's kinda of like BAC - some people can use it and others cannot no matter how hard they try.  In theory it should work for everyone, but it doesn't.



We actually have two former Army pilots in our squadron who could probably tell me all about eyes and dark adaptation.  As a C-130 pilot I'm used to keeping the white lights on in the cockpit and watching DVDs until we enter the terminal area!

I asked the red vs. amber question in a new thread, but unfortunately I can't try the two colors side-by-side.  My only experience with illuminated reticles was the marvelous TA11 with the red donut, but I'd really love to get a TR21 for my M4.  Does anyone know how someone who is red color-blind would see the two reticles?  Not me, obviously (that would be a downer from flight status), but I'd like my wife to have the ability to shoot my carbine in a stressful situation.  She sees reds as shades of grey.
12/12/2005 10:53:18 PM EDT
[#19]
I think it really comes down to where you prioritize the wife shooting it thing...  I sense you like the red, but she is red color blind.  Depending on who you order it from, I bet if you explained the situation beforehand (and you did not mount the scope) they would allow you to return the red within a short grace period and exchange it for an amber (shipping would be on you of course)...   Get the red and let her look through it under varying lighting conditions.  If she can make the shades of gray work, you are good to go...  In your other post, you mentioned that you will be shooting it 90% of the time, so you should get what you want.  When she decides to get her own AR and trijicon scope, consider yourself  the luckiest man alive and then get her an amber!


With great respect for Herc pilots who dare to land where others don't...
Copperhead
12/12/2005 11:30:44 PM EDT
[#20]
Thanks, I just did my first "short field" landing today - on the first 3,000 ft of a 12,000 ft runway!  Honestly, Navy Hercs don't do many exciting landings anymore, especially since we stopped operating in Antarctica.  That's a good thing according to most of our 'older' pilots, but I'm young, dumb, and full of you-know-what.

I think you may be right; a reasonable dealer may let me try one color and exchange it for the other if necessary.  As for my wife buying her own AR, I won't hold my breath.  She likes shooting but doesn't agree with buying more than the bare necessities.  I've been trying to save for an optic for a very long time and it probably won't happen until my next pay raise!

I appreciate the help.  Now back to our regularly scheduled thread...
AR Sponsor