AR Sponsor
Posted: 6/8/2003 7:06:58 AM EDT
| Anyone know a good source where you don't pay an arm and a leg for high capacity Ruger Mini 14 mags? --RR |
|
Yep, it's a pain in the ass to find good ones. I bought a 30 John Masen (mason?) from gunaccessories.com. My first one worked perfectly. I ordered another and in the second one the follower would get caught on the feed lips so it would not hold bolt open or really feed at all. Gunaccessories allowed me to exchange this second mag for a third which I now have and it works perfectly like my first one. 66.6% This is all the experience I have with mini mags. |
|
Quoted: Do you Reckon Ruger will have the god damned common decency to produce them for the public after the sunset? No, they won't. Ruger had NEVER made Mini-14 hi-caps available to civilians on purpose, but many FFLs would order them out of the police catalogs and sell them to civilians. Remember, it was Bill Ruger who suggested the mag capacity ban in the first place. Don't expect to see many factory hi-caps on the market even several years after the ban has expired... -Troy |
|
I've got a 20 and two 30s that run 100% of unknown manufacture. Then I have 4 USA mags that fairly reliable and one that is worthless that will spit rounds out of the top of the rifle when it gets to the last few shots... When buying Mini-14 mags I'd suggest buying a name brand mags and one at a time to see how well they work. Better to eat shipping a time or two than order a bunch of lousy mags. Avoid USA mags... I've got a ranch rifle that doesn't group worth a damn and the rear sight flip up sight is difficult to adjust. I replaced the front sight post with a flash hider that has a circle around the sight post. This makes the front sight a lot nicer, but it would be nice to find something better than the rear flip up pos... Would an M1 carbine sight or something similar work as a replacement for the rear flip up sight? Would adding a decent synthetic stock help the accuracy of the rifle any? Sorry to hijack the thread and thanks in advance. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Remember, it was Bill Ruger who suggested the mag capacity ban in the first place. Another urban myth needlessly perpetuated. Hardly. Can you provide a source for that? Sure! Here are a couple, but there are dozens if you'd like to look. Simply go to Google and type in "Bill Ruger mag ban". You might also check on the sources they give; all of the information is there. The whole event is a well-known issue, and those who were paying attention at the time will remember it well. [url]www.survival.com.mx/gunrack/b_ruger.html[/url] [url]communities.prodigy.net/sportsrec/gz-papabill.html[/url] -Troy |
|
Well, I asked my Dad what he wants for father's day and he says "some hi cap mags for my mini 14". Thanks for the suggestions guys. I was hoping Ruger had made some prebans that might be available somewhere. --RR Edited to add.... also looking for hi cap mags for S&W 9mm pistol. I believe it's a 14 round double stack. |
|
Quoted: Is there a source from a reliable news outlet that you can cite? There are sources in the documents I gave links to. It's not like CNN ran an hour-long special on this or anything. For the most part, the only people who took any notice were the gun rags. American Rifleman, Gun Week, Neal Knox's column, and many others covered this back in '93. As I said, this isn't just something I pulled out of my ass... -Troy |
|
I have a SS mini for sale(not the ranch rifle!) and it shoots great. Also have two USA 30 rd mags (argghh)for it that have functioned without a problem. I've had no FTF or hold back problems with these but haveonly put about 200-250 rounds thru the rifle and mags. These are also for sale on the equip exchange but go with the rifle. I've had good luck with my mags and only got them after I was assured I could return them if I had any problems. I would certainly not get USA mags for an AR. Ocassionally, orig Ruger 30 rd or thermolds pop up but they are rare and expensive. Gotta keep your eye out, that's for sure. Expect to pay over $70 per mag. [b]watch the equipment exchange[/b] |
| I have found that Precision Mag Industries (PMI) makes reliable Mini-14 30 rnd mags. The last time I bought some Mini mags was from Gun Parts Corp. I did a quick search and they don't appear to sell them anymore. You could try looking for PMI (this is not Pro-Mag Industries--I don't know what their mags are like). I feel for you. Finding good Mini-14 mags can be a Herculean task. |
|
The PMI's work the best, I have found them on Ebay. Also you can check out www.deltaforce.com I believe they still have the Mini 14 PMI 30 and 40 rounders on there or you can call them. USA's and Western's DO NOT hold the bolt open and I have had lots of feed problems with them but then again you get what you pay for |
|
You may occasionally find a PMI mags in packaging marked Federal Ordnance. These are the same mags, similar packaging, and the same part numbers as PMI. The Fed Ord mags had blank floorplates. Most of the PMI's have blank floorplates, but some have the PMI markings. These mags can be identified by the mag catch tab on the back side. The PMI/Fed Ord mags have a welded-on rectangular tab. The USA's have a simple roll in the metal and blank floorplates. Ruger mags have Ruger marked floorplates. BUT, there have been some USA mags floating around with Ruger stamped floorplates. Beware. I used the 30 rnd and 40 rnd Fed Ord mags for some years, and later, the PMI mags. They all worked well. Also had a few 20 rnd Rugers, which I sold, but also worked well. I have a few USA's, they work well, but the metal is thinner, and they seem flimsier. I don't know how they would hold up under strenuous use. I did run into some Mini-14 mags marked Mitchell Arms. These had a much sharper curve than Ruger or PMI mags, and just would not function. The geometry of the mag was all wrong. Last good source I had for the PMI mags was www.deltaforce.com |
| See if you can locate some 30rd Thermold Mini14 mags, they were very reliable in my Mini14 GB and price should be close to the Federal Ordinance/PMI mags. Again check the Equipment exchange for Ruger factory 20rd mags that sometimes show up in a not cheap but "reasonable" price range of $60 to $75. |
|
Quoted: I've got a ranch rifle that doesn't group worth a damn and the rear sight flip up sight is difficult to adjust. I replaced the front sight post with a flash hider that has a circle around the sight post. This makes the front sight a lot nicer, but it would be nice to find something better than the rear flip up pos... |
|
I have posted this before, but repeated tests by me, have shown that other than the crappy rear sights, the main cause of the inaccuracy of the Mini-14 is the loose wood stock fit. Replacing the stock with a tight fitting synthetic stock will cut your group size in half, much like bedding a M1A or M1 Garand. I like the Choate Pistol Grip stock (the non-folder) myself, but have also gotten tighter groups with the Butler Creek folder. Since you have a Ranch Rifle, I will tell you, with my two Ranch Rifles, both of which have the Choate Pistol Grip stock, with scopes, using either Remington UMC 55 gr fmj or Federal American Eagle 55 gr fmj, I can easily get 1.5" groups off the bench. That is good enough for the intended usage of this rifle, as a light weight 0-200 yd carbine. |
|
Can't do the pistol grip unless the ban goes away, because I've got an "evil" flash hider/front sight combo. I may well try a decent pistol grip stock on there when/if the stupid ban goes. The rear sight is my main problem aside from the stock. I was wondering if it can be be replaced with something along the lines of M1 carbine rear sight or something similar. |
|
Quoted: I have posted this before, but repeated tests by me, have shown that other than the crappy rear sights, the main cause of the inaccuracy of the Mini-14 is the loose wood stock fit. Replacing the stock with a tight fitting synthetic stock will cut your group size in half, much like bedding a M1A or M1 Garand. I like the Choate Pistol Grip stock (the non-folder) myself, but have also gotten tighter groups with the Butler Creek folder. Since you have a Ranch Rifle, I will tell you, with my two Ranch Rifles, both of which have the Choate Pistol Grip stock, with scopes, using either Remington UMC 55 gr fmj or Federal American Eagle 55 gr fmj, I can easily get 1.5" groups off the bench. That is good enough for the intended usage of this rifle, as a light weight 0-200 yd carbine. Can you bed the stock to Mini-14, I really like the wood stock. It looks nicer than the syntehtic stock. |
|
Fill a Ramline "Combo Mag" with 30 rounds, or even download to 25 or so. Now, drop it on a carpeted floor from a distance of two feet. Heck, just shake it. What happens? I'll tell you what happens, the ammo will spray all over the room. THAT is not good in an emergency! The plastic flexes and the feedlips are not sufficient to hold the ammo in. This is why I cannot recommend the Ramlines for use in either the AR15 or Mini-14. It has nothing to do with their function in the rifle. It has to do with their function OUTSIDE of the rifle, which is to hold them ammo in preperation for quick use by the rifle. The Thermolds are better in this respect. How many of you have dropped a fully loaded USGI mag? Pick it up, make sure there is not dirt in the top, slap it in and shoot. |
| What worked in my blued Ruger Mini14 GB folder which I sold last year. Ruger factory 20 and 30 rd mags, Thermold 30rd mags, Federal Ordinance/PMI 20 and 30rd mags and little known McCoy Mobile 30rd mags which were in my opinion the best of my aftermarket mags, they fit and functioned equal to my Ruger factory mags. I put the McCoy Mobile mags on the Equipment Board a couple times but had no takers, doubt many people have heard of them and I have seen only a few at gun shows. These are keepers if you have a Mini14 and they are the last of my Mini14 mags. Check Equipment board. |
|
MAybe you had shitty mags. I always kept a ramline combo loaded a full 30, jsut in case. Work in the AR or the Mini. Dropped it plenty of times. Never a problem. I cna see when they get older and work more, yes. But in the condition i had them ,never had a probelm. |
| Nope, I had 6 of the Ramline Combo Mags at one time which I bought new. They would puke ammo even when new. Age made no difference. All six of them. But they fed well. They did not reliably actuate the bolt catch in either the Mini-14 or the AR15, I forget which. But they are long gone by about 10 years. |
AR Sponsor