Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
3/22/2017 1:47:42 PM EDT
I'm familiar with the Colt 733 but not so much the 933. Is it just an M4A1 with a 11.5" pencil (.625" OD) barrel?
3/22/2017 1:52:38 PM EDT
[#1]
Pretty much. I don't remember if it's FA or Burst though. The current semi - Commandos are the same specs I think - still a ltwt profile barrel. I love the 11.5" lightweight carbines.
3/22/2017 2:26:47 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote History
Quoted:
Pretty much. I don't remember if it's FA or Burst though. The current semi - Commandos are the same specs I think - still a ltwt profile barrel. I love the 11.5" lightweight carbines.
View Quote
The 933 was FA. They had A1 and A2 profile 11.5" barrels with 1/7 twist. The Model 935  was the same thing, but with 3-round burst.
3/22/2017 2:35:45 PM EDT
[#3]
Thanks for the replies!

Any idea what the proper markings are on the lower receiver? There's very few photos online and most of them are airsoft whilst the others are too low of a resolution to make out anything.
3/22/2017 4:11:12 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote History
Quoted:
Thanks for the replies!

Any idea what the proper markings are on the lower receiver? There's very few photos online and most of them are airsoft whilst the others are too low of a resolution to make out anything.
View Quote
I know that these are labeled as a M4 Commando. I have seen pictures of some where it was marked M16A2 COMMANDO.
3/23/2017 8:50:00 AM EDT
[#5]
These were the best photos I could find, if somebody has better ones please do share. Looks like this one might have the M16A2 commando markings you mentioned, as well as the skinny "CAR-15" style hand guards.

Any idea when they were first produced and if they ever made it to any units?



3/23/2017 9:07:55 AM EDT
[#6]
From what I could find, the 933 has been in service since 1995 and is still used by some SOF units, but there is really no way to find out what number of them are still in service or which units are still using them.
3/23/2017 9:29:21 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:
From what I could find, the 933 has been in service since 1995 and is still used by some SOF units, but there is really no way to find out what number of them are still in service or which units are still using them.
View Quote
I just bought 34 of them. 

FA, pencil barrel.
3/23/2017 10:09:26 AM EDT
[#8]
Very interesting.

Would you be able to post some photos of them?
3/23/2017 10:29:45 AM EDT
[#9]
Early 'skinny' handguard gun.




3/23/2017 10:46:18 AM EDT
[#10]
Now I'm confused, wouldn't that be a 733 given the fixed carry handle?
3/23/2017 12:06:10 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:
Now I'm confused, wouldn't that be a 733 given the fixed carry handle?
View Quote
Yes.

Although there are a several different Commandos, each has its own model designation based on its configuration.
3/23/2017 2:16:45 PM EDT
[#12]
Force Recon used the 933 for awhile. I've seen pics. jrs93accord - did you ever carry one?
3/23/2017 2:22:44 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote History
Quoted:
Force Recon used the 933 for awhile. I've seen pics. jrs93accord - did you ever carry one?
View Quote
Never did. All I had was the M16A1. This was back in 1978-84. We did not even have any Commando models at all in our armory.
3/23/2017 2:52:19 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Quoted:
Yes.

Although there are a several different Commandos, each has its own model designation based on its configuration.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Now I'm confused, wouldn't that be a 733 given the fixed carry handle?
Yes.

Although there are a several different Commandos, each has its own model designation based on its configuration.
Gotcha, I'm aware, I was just confused by the photo of a 733 when we were talking 933's. I'm assuming Osprey wanted to show clearer photos of the M16A2 COMMANDO roll marks.

Quoted:
Force Recon used the 933 for awhile. I've seen pics. jrs93accord - did you ever carry one?
Would love to see them if you have them at hand. Any photos photos out there of SEAL's using them as well?
3/23/2017 8:17:46 PM EDT
[#15]
Here's something I always wondered about: What's the model number for an A2 Commando? Is it still 733, or is it say, an 833?
3/23/2017 8:45:29 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote History
Quoted:
Here's something I always wondered about: What's the model number for an A2 Commando? Is it still 733, or is it say, an 833?
View Quote
The Model 733 came with A1, A1E1 (C7), and A2 type upper receivers. I built one based on the A2 upper receiver. Barrels were either the A1 or A2 profile and were 1/7 twist as these were part of the M16A2 series weapons.

Attached File
3/24/2017 6:26:04 AM EDT
[#17]
Lovely build, that's an A2 profile barrel, right?
3/24/2017 7:39:48 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote History
Quoted:
Lovely build, that's an A2 profile barrel, right?
View Quote
Yes.
3/26/2017 6:04:34 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote History
Quoted:


The Model 733 came with A1, A1E1 (C7), and A2 type upper receivers. I built one based on the A2 upper receiver. Barrels were either the A1 or A2 profile and were 1/7 twist as these were part of the M16A2 series weapons.

Attached File
View Quote
3/27/2017 8:48:33 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote History
Quoted:


The Model 733 came with A1, A1E1 (C7), and A2 type upper receivers. I built one based on the A2 upper receiver. Barrels were either the A1 or A2 profile and were 1/7 twist as these were part of the M16A2 series weapons.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/76904/006-172520.JPG
View Quote
This is just flat out wrong information.

A 733 with an A2 upper is a 738.

Colt has never made A2 profile 11.5" commando barrels as standard production.
3/27/2017 12:01:28 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Quoted:



This is just flat out wrong information.

A 733 with an A2 upper is a 738.

Colt has never made A2 profile 11.5" commando barrels as standard production.
View Quote
Incorrect. The 733 did come in the A2 configuration towards the end of production. It was still a full-auto carbine. The 738, while in the same A2 configuration was different in that it had 3-round burst and a full-auto function. It was referred to as a M4 Commando Enhanced.
3/28/2017 12:23:34 PM EDT
[#22]
Just to confirm, the 11.5" barrels (both A1 and A2) have the same profiles as shown in this photo, right?

3/28/2017 2:41:26 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote History
Quoted:
Just to confirm, the 11.5" barrels (both A1 and A2) have the same profiles as shown in this photo, right?

http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p203/CHRIS65-IL/Profiles_A2_A1.jpg~original
View Quote
The 11.5" barrel profiles would be very similar to those.
3/28/2017 7:15:13 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote History
Quoted:


Incorrect. The 733 did come in the A2 configuration towards the end of production. It was still a full-auto carbine. The 738, while in the same A2 configuration was different in that it had 3-round burst and a full-auto function. It was referred to as a M4 Commando Enhanced.
View Quote
Have any proof of that?
3/28/2017 8:40:11 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote History
Quoted:



Have any proof of that?
View Quote
Do your homework. I did.
3/29/2017 11:55:51 AM EDT
[#26]
Just got an email from Colt -

Behold, the Colt 933 EPR

Attached File

Attached File
4/9/2017 9:36:56 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote History
Quoted:
This is just flat out wrong information.

A 733 with an A2 upper is a 738.

Colt has never made A2 profile 11.5" commando barrels as standard production.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


The Model 733 came with A1, A1E1 (C7), and A2 type upper receivers. I built one based on the A2 upper receiver. Barrels were either the A1 or A2 profile and were 1/7 twist as these were part of the M16A2 series weapons.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/76904/006-172520.JPG
This is just flat out wrong information.

A 733 with an A2 upper is a 738.

Colt has never made A2 profile 11.5" commando barrels as standard production.
Do your homework?  Nice.  He's simply asking for info/photos that would corroborate what you're saying.  People love the little details in this forum and you seem to be making statements as fact with nothing to back it up.

I know nothing about the 738 but like he mentioned I've never seen nor heard of a Colt 11.5" .750" barrel until you made your claim.  Do you have any photos of these barrels with Colt marks?  I'm not saying that I don't believe you, I'd genuinely like to see the pics because I'm interested in this stuff.

For years I'd heard people say that a Diemaco C8 was identical to a Colt 654.  I'd tell them that wasn't the case, that a C8 had a .750" FSB but had a lightweight profile as I'd never seen one with a .625" FSB.  Lo and behold a 1/7 14.5 lightweight with .625" FSB and Devtek markings surfaced proving me wrong.  I've still never seen photos of the .625" in service but I must admit that now it seems likely.
6/8/2017 5:52:14 PM EDT
[#28]


Fresh out ATF jail RO6933 
6/8/2017 7:03:41 PM EDT
[#29]
No offense, but why is this even in retro?
AR Sponsor