Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
2/17/2017 10:38:50 AM EDT
Retro Gurus.... I come seeking knowledge:

I traded into a 1967 vintage SP1 serial number 98XX and have a couple of questions.  The rifle is like new and shows little or no wear.  All external pieces check out correct, internally I'm not so sure....

1).  The bolt carrier is slick sided (no FA notches) but it is also Full Auto neutered.  There is no "C" mark on it either.  Is it correct?

2).  The hammer is not M-16 but a semi auto style, is that correct?

3).  The bolt is marked "MP" which seems correct...

Thank you for your help....
2/17/2017 10:45:19 AM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
Retro Gurus.... I come seeking knowledge:

I traded into a 1967 vintage SP1 serial number 98XX and have a couple of questions.  The rifle is like new and shows little or no wear.  All external pieces check out correct, internally I'm not so sure....

1).  The bolt carrier is slick sided (no FA notches) but it is also Full Auto neutered.  There is no "C" mark on it either.  Is it correct?

2).  The hammer is not M-16 but a semi auto style, is that correct?

3).  The bolt is marked "MP" which seems correct...

Thank you for your help....
View Quote


I have two 1967 SP1's, and they both have all of the features you describe.  Your magwell will also have a "+" on it, and the roll pin hole for your buffer tube will only be drilled on one side
2/17/2017 11:07:24 AM EDT
[#2]
Thank you M16, my lower is as you describe.  It also has the Edgewater buffer.  Glad to know it's all as it should be....
2/17/2017 11:21:35 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote History
Quoted:
Thank you M16, my lower is as you describe.  It also has the Edgewater buffer.  Glad to know it's all as it should be....
View Quote


You are welcome. I forgot to mention the edgewater - I'm glad nobody switched it out.  Congratulations on your nice "C&R" SP1 purchase. It's value won't do anything but go up.
2/17/2017 11:56:51 AM EDT
[#4]
1967 here as well, and I agree with the above post. You got a good one.
2/17/2017 1:02:56 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote History
Quoted:


I have two 1967 SP1's, and they both have all of the features you describe.  Your magwell will also have a "+" on it, and the roll pin hole for your buffer tube will only be drilled on one side
View Quote


You need to share.
2/17/2017 3:44:40 PM EDT
[#6]
OP:  Your pics aren't uploading.
2/17/2017 4:42:22 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote History
Quoted:
OP:  Your pics aren't uploading.
View Quote


+1

2/17/2017 5:18:58 PM EDT
[#8]
Has anyone mentioned how bad photobucket sucks these days?

Here she is:





2/17/2017 5:43:50 PM EDT
[#9]
That's a great looking SP1. Congrats!
2/17/2017 6:00:36 PM EDT
[#10]
Very nice, thanks for the detail pics. You have one of the lowers where the buffer tube retaining pin isn't machined through, very cool
2/17/2017 6:28:04 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:
Very nice, thanks for the detail pics. You have one of the lowers where the buffer tube retaining pin isn't machined through, very cool
View Quote


Both of my 1967 SP1's are like that too.  I think 1967 must have been when they quit pinning the buffer tubes, and the hole in one side of the receiver is just the pilot hole.
2/17/2017 6:40:02 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote History
Quoted:


Both of my 1967 SP1's are like that too.  I think 1967 must have been when they quit pinning the buffer tubes, and the hole in one side of the receiver is just the pilot hole.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Very nice, thanks for the detail pics. You have one of the lowers where the buffer tube retaining pin isn't machined through, very cool


Both of my 1967 SP1's are like that too.  I think 1967 must have been when they quit pinning the buffer tubes, and the hole in one side of the receiver is just the pilot hole.


I agree.

I have pics of XM16E1 SN 558096 with the hole all the way through, and SN 667458 with only the pilot hole, so it was somewhere in there.
AR Sponsor