User Panel
Quoted:
Sounds like something from the "Build your DDM4" program. Curious as to barrel specs. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It was a build for Brownells when they did a M4A1 SOPMOD Clone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Sounds like something from the "Build your DDM4" program. Curious as to barrel specs. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: Should have grabbed the OEM Delta ring assembly from CDNN. That was one of the things I got to get up to free shipping. Can’t really tell quality by looks alone, but it looks like it’s from the same manufacturer of BCM’s Delta assemblies. Possibly even Colts. The finish, the C clip, and the spring looks identical, and you’d be surprised how much they can actually differ in appearance from one manufacturer to the next. Just a simple part, but I’m pleased. I was afraid it look and feel cheap, and I’m pretty ocd about every little part. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I remember when Brownells offered that rifle, but this upper was different. I saw the photo in then product page and read the description. It had a 14.5 Socom/Heavy CHF barrel with a 15" Mlok rail that covered the muzzle, but the pinned flaming pig fit under the rail and extended about an inch past the rail. It seemed like their take on the Noveske infidel. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
Well, here’s some accuracy results. This is just practical accuracy. I used cheap brass surplus ammunition, an Aimpoint Comp M4s, and was kneeling unsupported. I used the same bolt, optic, and lower for each group to keep it fair. I did not fool with sighting in the optic for each upper.I had about a half hour to burn, so this is all you all get lol Nothing special, and I didn’t even take the time to measure MOA. Sorry. Honestly, they all 3 performed very well, other than the Colt at 100, and I’m 99% sure that was me and not the barrel. It was muddy as hell, getting dark, and my range goes down the side of a wooded ridge. Under better conditions, resting on a bench, and with magnification, I’m positive the results would be much better. Practical accuracy is important to me though. I don’t do a lot of bench shooting, and if I can be at around 3 MOA with cheap brass, I’m happy. Anyways, here it is. All barrels are 14.5” Socom profile with an A2 flash hider on an SBR BCM lower. The BCM has had about 2,000 round through it. This is the first time I’ve shot the Colt and Remington. Both were just recently built. Also want to note that the Comp M4s is practically a 3 MOA for me with my slight astigmatism. It’s not as sharp as it should be. I should have my first Eotech Monday. Hoping it’s a better optic for me. 75 Yards. 10 shot groups. Federal American Eagle 223 55g FMJ. BCM https://i.imgur.com/P6SWIOD.jpg Colt https://i.imgur.com/w056ZXA.jpg Remington https://i.imgur.com/1M1uVGg.jpg 100 Yards. 5 shot groups. Fiocchi M193 55g FMJ 556 BCM https://i.imgur.com/2PHyYRL.jpg Colt (again, I think I’m to blame for these results) https://i.imgur.com/rl6ObLB.jpg Remington https://i.imgur.com/PVRAH8S.jpg https://i.imgur.com/scQYI1h.jpg View Quote |
|
I’ve been following this thread and convinced myself to buy an 11.5” Rem. So I go to CDNN and thought they raised the price to $199.99. Well, they didn’t.
It’s an 11.5” Rem with what appears to be the same specs but different markings, well, maybe the same markings but in different locations. Interesting… CDNN |
|
Quoted:
I’ve been following this thread and convinced myself to buy an 11.5” Rem. So I go to CDNN and thought they raised the price to $199.99. Well, they didn’t. It’s an 11.5” Rem with what appears to be the same specs but different markings, well, maybe the same markings but in different locations. Interesting… CDNN View Quote |
|
May very well be the same barrel but the markings appear to be under the handguard on this model. Not near the muzzle as on the others.
|
|
Quoted:
May very well be the same barrel but the markings appear to be under the handguard on this model. Not near the muzzle as on the others. View Quote |
|
I don’t think this has been answered yet, but I found out REP stands for Remington English Proof. It means it’s been tested to meet SAAMI standards. Not sure what that means for the barrels that don’t have it. Maybe they are the Philippine contract barrels, and the REP marked barrels are for the US market.
Eta: looks like Remington use to proof mark their USGI and foreign military contract firearms with just a “P” in the past. So, as mentioned above, it’s likely the P marked barrels are from previous mil contracts and foreign contracts, and the REP marked barrels are for domestic sales. I could be wrong, but that’s based on how they’ve marked in the past. Edit: “P” could also stand for 2018 production. I reckon I’m going to be the sucker that spends an extra $20 on the other 11.5” barrel. I’m going to chop it, so the location of the markings are worth the extra $20 to me. I don’t think they are REP marked. I’ll share the details once I get it. |
|
Got out today to do some test firing and shoot a few groups only shot at 25 yards with irons and then 50yards. Looking good to me. Sorry I don’t Know why the photos are so blurry.
50yds PPU 69 gr .74” & .65” " /> 25yds AE M855 .28” " /> |
|
Quoted:
Got out today to do some test firing and shoot a few groups only shot at 25 yards with irons and then 50yards. Looking good to me. Sorry I don’t Know why the photos are so blurry. 50yds PPU 69 gr .74” & .65” http://i1381.photobucket.com/albums/ah205/steveallen717/DEFB312A-538D-448C-8EC6-74A5BDA5788B_zpsaxqcqzkg.jpg" target="_blank">http://i1381.photobucket.com/albums/ah205/steveallen717/DEFB312A-538D-448C-8EC6-74A5BDA5788B_zpsaxqcqzkg.jpg 25yds AE M855 .28” http://i1381.photobucket.com/albums/ah205/steveallen717/F26E0C2D-A1E1-4387-BCD5-35FFFB253D13_zpsky8i7jnl.png" target="_blank">http://i1381.photobucket.com/albums/ah205/steveallen717/F26E0C2D-A1E1-4387-BCD5-35FFFB253D13_zpsky8i7jnl.png View Quote |
|
Quoted: Man, I didn’t realize they had the 92f magazines. Guess that’s what I’ll add to the cart to get free shipping on the 11.5”. Just received the sling assembly for the Colt barreled upper today, and this gem was on Chris’s business card. This is sort of what I’m going to go for with the 11.5”. Obviously this barrel is a little shorter, but I think it’ll look great with the 11.5”. I could always chop it if I decide to. https://i.imgur.com/QM2Hell.jpg View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: Damn straight. Chris is solid. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
I’ve been following this thread and convinced myself to buy an 11.5” Rem. So I go to CDNN and thought they raised the price to $199.99. Well, they didn’t. It’s an 11.5” Rem with what appears to be the same specs but different markings, well, maybe the same markings but in different locations. Interesting… CDNN View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I saw that also. cdnn being 'tards. View Quote |
|
Quoted: If the markings truly are under the handguards, and this isn’t the usually CDNN bait and switch, $20 isn’t an issue for those that want to cut it down while keeping the markings. I wish like hell I would have got the barrels for $99 or $129, but even at $179 they appear to be worth it. They’ll definitely be worth it if more don’t hit the market. Hell, people are paying close to $300 for them on gun broker. Like I said, as long as Remington doesn’t flood the market with them, they’ll retain value and some. View Quote |
|
Quoted: They are 11.5" barrels with FSP, so I don't think anyone is really going to want to cut and thread the barrel. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I’ve been following this thread and convinced myself to buy an 11.5” Rem. So I go to CDNN and thought they raised the price to $199.99. Well, they didn’t. It’s an 11.5” Rem with what appears to be the same specs but different markings, well, maybe the same markings but in different locations. Interesting… CDNN View Quote Help me out...can explain this post in more detail? |
|
Quoted:
@AkAgent Help me out...can explain this post in more detail? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I’ve been following this thread and convinced myself to buy an 11.5” Rem. So I go to CDNN and thought they raised the price to $199.99. Well, they didn’t. It’s an 11.5” Rem with what appears to be the same specs but different markings, well, maybe the same markings but in different locations. Interesting… CDNN Help me out...can explain this post in more detail? |
|
Quoted:
@AkAgent Help me out...can explain this post in more detail? View Quote |
|
@crogers23
All 4.... dont forget the 11.5 non fsb "P" barrel |
|
|
|
Quoted:
@InsanceAuto86 I haven’t been able to find them on CDNN’s site (their search function sucks). Do you have a link? I was just thinking that they sold out or something. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Got my 11.5” barrel from CDNN and my 14.5” back from John Thomas. Both look great and will post pictures tomorrow.
The 11.5” is much nicer that the 14.5” barrel. On the left side of the barrel just in front of the FSB is “070” for the gas port size, and on the right the markings are “REP.” |
|
Can someone help me figure out what the difference is between the 11.5 barrels they are offering? The pictures look identical; one of the barrels has a description mentioning 203 flat cuts because of a thick barrel. I'm aiming to get a thick barrel for future use with a suppressor.
1) https://www.cdnnsports.com/ar15-pistol-barrel-556-11-5-chrome-bore-remington.html#.XjDl9mhKi70 2) https://www.cdnnsports.com/ar15-pistol-barrel-556-11-5-a2-chrome-bore-rem.html#.XjDkuGhKi70 Also, any feedback on this upper? https://www.cdnnsports.com/ar15-upper-assembly-m4-cover-and-forward-assist-22252.html?___SID=U#.XjDqP2hKi70 Thanks! |
|
Quoted:
Can someone help me figure out what the difference is between the 11.5 barrels they are offering? The pictures look identical; one of the barrels has a description mentioning 203 flat cuts because of a thick barrel. I'm aiming to get a thick barrel for future use with a suppressor. 1) https://www.cdnnsports.com/ar15-pistol-barrel-556-11-5-chrome-bore-remington.html#.XjDl9mhKi70 2) https://www.cdnnsports.com/ar15-pistol-barrel-556-11-5-a2-chrome-bore-rem.html#.XjDkuGhKi70 Also, any feedback on this upper? https://www.cdnnsports.com/ar15-upper-assembly-m4-cover-and-forward-assist-22252.html?___SID=U#.XjDqP2hKi70 Thanks! View Quote |
|
|
First link the markings are in front of the fsb the second link the markings are behind the fsb. I don’t know much about the upper I’m sure it probably gtg.
|
|
Quoted: Thanks for the heads up, I fixed it. View Quote For the upper, don’t expect to get one with the square forge mark. They like to bait and switch. It’s likely a stock photo. |
|
Quoted: Thanks for the heads up, I fixed it. View Quote In all seriousness, bbls appear to be identical other than the markings location as stated. It'd be nice to know the history on these 11.5s.....M4A1 they are not. And I'm fairly certain that there is zero ability to mount a 203 to these. Starting to wonder if these are chopped 14.5s in an attempt to jump on the 11.5 train that the Colt FBI bbls got rolling ? |
|
Quoted:
Starting to wonder if these are chopped 14.5s in an attempt to jump on the 11.5 train that the Colt FBI bbls got rolling ? View Quote |
|
Quoted: I would think a check of the muzzle for how the chrome looks as it exits the inside of the barrel, and a check of the gas port size, could provide insight on the question you raise. That said, Remington offers 11.5 barreled rifles and that length is very popular in the .gov world for LEO and other applications, so I suspect they started life as 11.5's and were not cut down. View Quote But why the milled flats? Eta: and looking back, GP diameter is correct for 11.5 and bore chroming showing on muzzles is consistent with new production bbls , like you stated. So, I'm stumped. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
True. But why the milled flats? Eta: and looking back, GP diameter is correct for 11.5 and bore chroming showing on muzzles is consistent with new production bbls , like you stated. So, I'm stumped. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted: I would think a check of the muzzle for how the chrome looks as it exits the inside of the barrel, and a check of the gas port size, could provide insight on the question you raise. That said, Remington offers 11.5 barreled rifles and that length is very popular in the .gov world for LEO and other applications, so I suspect they started life as 11.5's and were not cut down. But why the milled flats? Eta: and looking back, GP diameter is correct for 11.5 and bore chroming showing on muzzles is consistent with new production bbls , like you stated. So, I'm stumped. As for the flats, there are a few rails that need the flats in order to get the barrel nut wrench on to tighten the system. I wouldn't imagine that this would be the deciding factor for the customer, but It could be a concern (Maybe??) |
|
Quoted: Is that bad? I don't care about markings, I just want a good quality upper. If I'm better off just buying a blem BCM or an Aero upper, I'll do it. But, these look like a good deal. Thanks for the help! View Quote |
|
Quoted: With the amount of chrome on the bore, i would guess they were purpose built 11.5 barrels. As for the flats, there are a few rails that need the flats in order to get the barrel nut wrench on to tighten the system. I wouldn't imagine that this would be the deciding factor for the customer, but It could be a concern (Maybe??) View Quote Never heard anything of the sort. |
|
Quoted:
What bbl wrenches require the milled flats? Never heard anything of the sort. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
True. But why the milled flats? Eta: and looking back, GP diameter is correct for 11.5 and bore chroming showing on muzzles is consistent with new production bbls , like you stated. So, I'm stumped. View Quote Attached File |
|
Quoted: Yeah, definitely not a cutdown from a 14.5 M4 as the profile and length wouldn't allow it. The chroming is also a giveaway. I'm thinking that it was just an f-up when roll marked. On my barrel you can see that it started too far back under the far end of the sight tower, they then turned it down and the new markings appear to laser etched. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/141194/IMG_E9486_JPG-1255246.JPG View Quote |
|
Quoted: Yeah, definitely not a cutdown from a 14.5 M4 as the profile and length wouldn't allow it. The chroming is also a giveaway. I'm thinking that it was just an f-up when roll marked. On my barrel you can see that it started too far back under the far end of the sight tower, they then turned it down and the new markings appear to laser etched. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/141194/IMG_E9486_JPG-1255246.JPG View Quote |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.