Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
7/2/2007 6:43:24 AM EDT

    I know this is a perception based kind of question and everybody's mileage kinda varies here, but how much difference in handling/weight should I expect between a 16" AR Carbine (medium length gas system, not that it matters) with a government profiled barrel, versus the same rifle with a medium profiled barrel?


   I thinking about issues such as balance and quickness of the weapon.   What advantages (if any) would the medium contour barrel have over the government profile anyway?

   Thanks,

   Dave
7/2/2007 8:22:06 PM EDT
[#1]
advantages of medium contour - heavier, less muzzle rise, stiffer with less barrel whip and less affected by use of a tightly used sling; able to trim later say into a Light Medium diameter of 0.688".

You've been lurking a while I see...
7/2/2007 10:50:09 PM EDT
[#2]
Who makes a chrome lined medium contour barrel in 14.5 or 14.7 inch length?  I seem to be having trouble finding one.  The pencil barrel bounces around too much, as I'm so used to heavies, but I want to get the weight down.  Thanks.
7/3/2007 12:51:14 AM EDT
[#3]

Quoted:
Who makes a chrome lined medium contour barrel in 14.5 or 14.7 inch length?  I seem to be having trouble finding one.  The pencil barrel bounces around too much, as I'm so used to heavies, but I want to get the weight down.  Thanks.


Try CMMG.  They have a good selection.
7/3/2007 4:26:33 AM EDT
[#4]
I apologise for the thread hijack.  Let me answer you question in exchange.

The light CAR pencil barrels are a bit difficult to control in rapid aimed fire.  That was the first thing I ever shot in an ar.  I mean a true lightweight CAR.  I really didn't like it that much, as I didn't like it bouncing about so much.  

I always built heavy barreled carbines for myself when I did a 16" gun after that experience.  They are pretty unpleasant to carry if you are carrying them for a few hours.  Hiking with a HBAR carbine is not so much fun.  Also, shooting in a competition where you are moving a lot makes the HBAR a bit of overkill.  The barrel doesn't rise too badly, but it is like shooting clays...you tend to swing past your target.  A lighter barrel with a compensator works much better if that is allowed in whatever you are shooting.

I am looking for a 14.5 inch medium contour barrel with a CAR length gas system.  I am trying to convince CMMG to do one for me.  Thanks to the poster who replied to me, as that was my first idea, too.  I just wish they did a 1 in 8 or 9 inch twist, as I like the 55 grain bullets for a lot of carbine work.  

Good luck.



7/3/2007 6:36:54 AM EDT
[#5]
  Lurk????   Me?????h.gif


height=8
Quoted:
advantages of medium contour - heavier, less muzzle rise, stiffer with less barrel whip and less affected by use of a tightly used sling; able to trim later say into a Light Medium diameter of 0.688".

You've been lurking a while I see...
7/3/2007 6:38:37 AM EDT
[#6]

  (Hijacking my own thread here):   Do you think 1:7 is too fast for the 55 grain?



height=8
Quoted:
I apologise for the thread hijack.  Let me answer you question in exchange.

The light CAR pencil barrels are a bit difficult to control in rapid aimed fire.  That was the first thing I ever shot in an ar.  I mean a true lightweight CAR.  I really didn't like it that much, as I didn't like it bouncing about so much.  

I always built heavy barreled carbines for myself when I did a 16" gun after that experience.  They are pretty unpleasant to carry if you are carrying them for a few hours.  Hiking with a HBAR carbine is not so much fun.  Also, shooting in a competition where you are moving a lot makes the HBAR a bit of overkill.  The barrel doesn't rise too badly, but it is like shooting clays...you tend to swing past your target.  A lighter barrel with a compensator works much better if that is allowed in whatever you are shooting.

I am looking for a 14.5 inch medium contour barrel with a CAR length gas system.  I am trying to convince CMMG to do one for me.  Thanks to the poster who replied to me, as that was my first idea, too.  I just wish they did a 1 in 8 or 9 inch twist, as I like the 55 grain bullets for a lot of carbine work.  

Good luck.



7/3/2007 8:11:25 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
  (Hijacking my own thread here):   Do you think 1:7 is too fast for the 55 grain?


No, it's not, and it will give you the ability to shoot heavier bullets when you want.
It may be too fast for certain real light varmint bullets- 40 gr, etc., but for FMJ 55, it will work real well.
7/3/2007 10:29:36 AM EDT
[#8]
I haven't personally owned a 1:7 gun, but I have shot them.  I haven't had any problems, but I am probably never going to be shooting any tracers through my guns.  I prefer the 55 grain bullet out of the carbine at the shorter ranges I am likely to use it.  Ammo is less expensive, &c.  I have seen 1:7 guns that were not quite as accurate as otherwise identical 1:9 guns with 55 grain bullets.  They were still good, but they were noticeably different, like maybe .5 MOA worse.  Even with a "better" barrel, some were not quite as good.  You do hear about some issues with really thin jacketed ammo or lighter bullets, so there is that downside.  Does that really matter?  Probably not, but we choose the best rate of twist for so many other guns, why not AR's?  It really just depends on what you are going to be shooting.  The 1:8 guns really do a good job on 69gr bullets, and that is what I prefer in a 20 inch barrel for a bit longer range shooting.  For a military gun I would certainly want 1:7 for the tracers, and even for some of the 75-77+grain 5.56 bullets that are being used by some units, but I am satisfied with what I have always had good results with.  I suppose I am just getting passed up by the younger generation.  Remember 1:12 and 1:14?
7/3/2007 12:14:04 PM EDT
[#9]

  I remember 1/12 in the M16A1.   I still have TM9-1005-249-10 as a keepsake (it's operator manual  for the M16A1 from 1972, the one that was drawn up like a comic book).

David

height=8
Quoted:
I haven't personally owned a 1:7 gun, but I have shot them.  I haven't had any problems, but I am probably never going to be shooting any tracers through my guns.  I prefer the 55 grain bullet out of the carbine at the shorter ranges I am likely to use it.  Ammo is less expensive, &c.  I have seen 1:7 guns that were not quite as accurate as otherwise identical 1:9 guns with 55 grain bullets.  They were still good, but they were noticeably different, like maybe .5 MOA worse.  Even with a "better" barrel, some were not quite as good.  You do hear about some issues with really thin jacketed ammo or lighter bullets, so there is that downside.  Does that really matter?  Probably not, but we choose the best rate of twist for so many other guns, why not AR's?  It really just depends on what you are going to be shooting.  The 1:8 guns really do a good job on 69gr bullets, and that is what I prefer in a 20 inch barrel for a bit longer range shooting.  For a military gun I would certainly want 1:7 for the tracers, and even for some of the 75-77+grain 5.56 bullets that are being used by some units, but I am satisfied with what I have always had good results with.  I suppose I am just getting passed up by the younger generation.  Remember 1:12 and 1:14?
7/3/2007 10:02:08 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
I am looking for a 14.5 inch medium contour barrel with a CAR length gas system.  I am trying to convince CMMG to do one for me.


They will do it for you if you ask nicely.
I know because they send me barrels every couple weeks for me to do things like this for them.

I recommend the mid-length gas system though.
7/4/2007 4:41:22 AM EDT
[#11]
CMMG got back to me yesterday afternoon, and they said the same.  They wouldn't do it themselves, but they would send it to you to do.  I can do it here in town, but I have always been hesitant to cut a chrome lined barrel.  I know that done right it is no problem, but I have always thought it would be best to have the lining done last.  Who knows, if I can't find anything factory, I might have to give in.  Thanks.
7/5/2007 2:07:55 PM EDT
[#12]
Here's a link that might give a little insight to your question.  I've been thinking about having my RRA middy turned down like ElIntocable did in the linked thread.....my holdup is deciding whether to also have it cut down to a 14.7 and having the FH pinned.
Reprofiled Middy
Best to ya!

7/5/2007 10:31:14 PM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I am looking for a 14.5 inch medium contour barrel with a CAR length gas system.  I am trying to convince CMMG to do one for me.


They will do it for you if you ask nicely.
I know because they send me barrels every couple weeks for me to do things like this for them.

I recommend the mid-length gas system though.


How strongly would you recommend Midlength gas over CAR for a 14.5"?
7/6/2007 1:45:12 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:

Quoted:

I recommend the mid-length gas system though.


How strongly would you recommend Midlength gas over CAR for a 14.5"?



Inquiring minds with stripped lowers and excess cash want to know.

Tagged for response

ZM
7/6/2007 7:50:01 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
I am looking for a 14.5 inch medium contour barrel with a CAR length gas system.  I am trying to convince CMMG to do one for me.


They will do it for you if you ask nicely.
I know because they send me barrels every couple weeks for me to do things like this for them.

I recommend the mid-length gas system though.


How strongly would you recommend Midlength gas over CAR for a 14.5"?


People in the artic using any ammo or people in alaska or the northern territories who want to run wolf ammo should not run a 14.5" mid-length.
Everyone else is OK.
Don't expect to run a heavy buffer or a 9mm buffer.
Carbine buffer is all you will need.
7/6/2007 9:06:42 AM EDT
[#16]
Wouldn't a mid length gas system spoil the bayonet ability of the carbine?
7/6/2007 1:19:04 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
Wouldn't a mid length gas system spoil the bayonet ability of the carbine?


You are a member of that group and the 14.5" mid-length barrel is NOT for you...
7/6/2007 1:23:46 PM EDT
[#18]
height=8
Quoted:


I wont own nothing but a 1/7 NOW

LMT DEFENDER M4 14.5 1/7 twist

shoot win USA 45gr HP Very TIGHT groups
Better than Q3131 M193


My LMT 1/7 loves 75gr OTMS and 77OTMS   wich a 1/12 cant do
My bushmasters HBARS are 1/9 and they also can handle 75/77gr


HBAR is just a waste only good for a sand bag


also my DEFENDER M4 14.5 stays on TARGET but I did add a heavy ass buffer hat
I don't mind the HBAR at all, so long as they have a fixed stock.  The collapsible stock is totally better with a medium contour or lighter weight barrel.  I handled a 14.5 HBAR that had been fluted the other day, and really liked how it felt - much lighter and easier to handle.  My next build is going to be a medium contour 14.5 inch with collapsible stock, I do believe.
7/6/2007 2:40:50 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
I am looking for a 14.5 inch medium contour barrel with a CAR length gas system.  I am trying to convince CMMG to do one for me.


They will do it for you if you ask nicely.
I know because they send me barrels every couple weeks for me to do things like this for them.

I recommend the mid-length gas system though.


How strongly would you recommend Midlength gas over CAR for a 14.5"?


People in the artic using any ammo or people in alaska or the northern territories who want to run wolf ammo should not run a 14.5" mid-length.
Everyone else is OK.
Don't expect to run a heavy buffer or a 9mm buffer.
Carbine buffer is all you will need.


Not exactly a rininging endorsement.

What happens if it gets cold?
7/6/2007 2:51:38 PM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
What happens if it gets cold?


Wimpy ammo short strokes.
Your bolt catch might not pop up on the last round.
AR Sponsor