AR Sponsor
Mk 18 / CQBR (Page 2 of 1609)
|
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
<a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/90kv.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/90kv.jpg</a> <a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/null-13.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/null-13.jpg</a> <a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/null-7.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/null-7.jpg</a> <a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/IMG_0022_zps9596809b.png.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/IMG_0022_zps9596809b.png</a> <a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/10591337784_86983d0e28_o.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/10591337784_86983d0e28_o.jpg</a> <a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/10099595083_6ff061d20d_b.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/10099595083_6ff061d20d_b.jpg</a> <a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/1654380_10152638969519569_1465096917_n.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/1654380_10152638969519569_1465096917_n.jpg</a> <a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/1488211_10152131778054769_988496151_n.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/1488211_10152131778054769_988496151_n.jpg</a> <a href="http://s890.photobucket.com/user/SJasper84/media/1F16A991-91D8-4C2E-86F5-A44BEEBAFBE7-324-0000009B8AFA7E13.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac108/SJasper84/1F16A991-91D8-4C2E-86F5-A44BEEBAFBE7-324-0000009B8AFA7E13.jpg</a> Second from Bottom is airsoft. |
Nothing ever happens in Berezino.
|
Any further info on this pic? I'm curious because of the .40 Glock (FDE mag extension), the Ranger Green MBAV/MAP, and Mk18. I was told some Glocks in 9 are being issued in Ranger Regiment, mostly for use with suppressors. |
"and the LORD Almighty will shield them. They will destroy and overcome with slingstones...." Zechariah 9:15
|
Originally Posted By stoner63a: Any further info on this pic? I'm curious because of the .40 Glock (FDE mag extension), the Ranger Green MBAV/MAP, and Mk18. I was told some Glocks in 9 are being issued in Ranger Regiment, mostly for use with suppressors. Originally Posted By stoner63a: Originally Posted By StevieJ309: http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/560/tn9f.jpg http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/560/tn9f.jpg Any further info on this pic? I'm curious because of the .40 Glock (FDE mag extension), the Ranger Green MBAV/MAP, and Mk18. I was told some Glocks in 9 are being issued in Ranger Regiment, mostly for use with suppressors. 75th Rangers training for some kind of media day event (the original set has several civilian photographers there taking pics of the guys training). The Glocks you see are definitely in .40 I actually dig Glocks alongside the CQBR Block II - makes for a cool package. |
|
Originally Posted By stoner63a:
Any further info on this pic? I'm curious because of the .40 Glock (FDE mag extension), the Ranger Green MBAV/MAP, and Mk18. I was told some Glocks in 9 are being issued in Ranger Regiment, mostly for use with suppressors. Originally Posted By stoner63a:
Originally Posted By StevieJ309:
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/560/tn9f.jpg <a href="https://imageshack.com/i/fktn9fj" target="_blank">http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1024x768q90/560/tn9f.jpg</a> Any further info on this pic? I'm curious because of the .40 Glock (FDE mag extension), the Ranger Green MBAV/MAP, and Mk18. I was told some Glocks in 9 are being issued in Ranger Regiment, mostly for use with suppressors. They are SFARTAETC (Special Forces Advanced Reconnaissance, Target Analysis, and Exploitation Techniques Course) instructors at Fort Bragg giving a demonstration during part of 2012's CAPEX. |
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." - Mark Twain
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
I've been wanting to do this for a while now, but finally decided to make it happen today... I was able to get the color fill out of the pirate logo part with some acetone - still have to do the bullet markings, but I think it looks much cleaner now: http://i1081.photobucket.com/albums/j352/javaman85/unnamed_zps9b45eeb3.jpg?t=1394905091 I'm also on the hunt for a deal on an SF3P or a KAC NT4 to replace the DD proprietary flash hider. Just rattle can that lower, nothing looks more clone-like than a crappy paint job, Oh and I got a NT4 for you. |
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Here's some more from the same set of images - title of the set is "U.S. Army Special Operations Command 2012 Capabilities Exercise, April 20." http://www.abload.de/img/capex201204ljrwj.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/capex201205s9rg0.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/capex201207k7ocj.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/capex201210dxuqz.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/capex2012206iuzs.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/capex201216p1u53.jpg http://www.abload.de/img/capex201217isuxm.jpg And close ups of the Glocks: http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/7616/sfglock2.png http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/3985/sfglock3.png http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/6942/sfglock4.png http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/5430/sfglock5.png This isn't a glock thread, but thanks again for the derailing. This is a Technical Forum. Keep it Technical, please - Old_Painless MARSOC CQBR 
|
Not living in my mom's basement, so I'm doing better than some.
Just another 0311.
Just another 0311.
Here are mine. Only non-Colt parts on the two rifles (excepting the obvious) are the Noveske stripped lower and LMT bolt catch on the Mod 0. Hopefully I will get my QDSS NT4 in the next couple of months. I need to hit the Mod 0 Block I CQBR clone with some paint when the weather improves.
ETA: The Mod 0 Block I CQBR(?) has a RAS not the RIS. 
|
|
Originally Posted By LongTrang:
In addition to peq 2's add the peq5 visible laser. When you study the MK 18's of Murph and Axe, they are using them since the peq 2 was IR only. Also, I have a pic a fella running a DBAL. Originally Posted By LongTrang:
Originally Posted By TinyCrumb:
Originally Posted By schaz42:
• Laser: none on Mk18 Mod0 Updated the errors, thanks! You sure about the PEQ-2 though? I thought for sure I've seen quite a few in the wild Mod 0s with PEQ-2s. In addition to peq 2's add the peq5 visible laser. When you study the MK 18's of Murph and Axe, they are using them since the peq 2 was IR only. Also, I have a pic a fella running a DBAL. The only grip on Mod0's were A1, they were surplus M16A1 lowers and we had no lasers of any kind, the Mod0 was used on onboard ship for VBSS. Murphy and Axe we not using Mk18's, they used CQBR M4A1's, which of course would have A2 grips and used for laser designators. I know it's splitting hairs but the CBQR and Mod0 were used by entirely different personnel for different missions. William |
|
My Old School Mod 0. It's a 10.5 LMT barrel, No happy switch and a magpul trigger guard but other than that it's all spec., including the Knights RIS.   |
The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil,
but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
Rise And Rise Again Until Lambs Become Lions.
but because of the people who don't do anything about it.
Rise And Rise Again Until Lambs Become Lions.
" />
|
Originally Posted By boneislandphoto:
http://<a href=http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr227/boneislandphoto/MK18Setup.jpg</a>" /> PUT IT TOGETHER!!! If you needs tools I'm your man. William in Titusville |
| Anyone SBR a 6920 SOCOM for the M4A1 markings? Where did you do your engravings? I'm tearing down my non-spec Block II CQBR and want to try and do a super-spec clone when money frees itself up. Would probably pair it with a proper 14.5 PR upper or B2 upper as well someday. |
|
Originally Posted By schaz42:
PUT IT TOGETHER!!! If you needs tools I'm your man. William in Titusville Originally Posted By schaz42:
Originally Posted By boneislandphoto:
http://<a href=http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr227/boneislandphoto/MK18Setup.jpg</a>" /> PUT IT TOGETHER!!! If you needs tools I'm your man. William in Titusville Thanks for the offer of help and tools William, but it is together (the photo above it is the completed weapon)... and is a nail-driver. With the exception of the non-rotating pins it is built to spec with all Colt parts, H2 buffer, extractor upgrade, etc. made it as close as I could get it. Couldn't bring myself to run the KAC vert grip though so I put on a KAC handstop and use that as a small vert grip. |
|
Originally Posted By schaz42:
The only grip on Mod0's were A1, they were surplus M16A1 lowers and we had no lasers of any kind, the Mod0 was used on onboard ship for VBSS. Murphy and Axe we not using Mk18's, they used CQBR M4A1's, which of course would have A2 grips and used for laser designators. I know it's splitting hairs but the CBQR and Mod0 were used by entirely different personnel for different missions. William Hey William, thanks for the info, and good point. Is there any functional difference between the two besides the lowers they were put on? Seems like Mod 0s and CQBR block 1s were almost exactly the same parts? |
|
Originally Posted By TinyCrumb:
Hey William, thanks for the info, and good point. Is there any functional difference between the two besides the lowers they were put on? Seems like Mod 0s and CQBR block 1s were almost exactly the same parts? Originally Posted By TinyCrumb:
Originally Posted By schaz42:
The only grip on Mod0's were A1, they were surplus M16A1 lowers and we had no lasers of any kind, the Mod0 was used on onboard ship for VBSS. Murphy and Axe we not using Mk18's, they used CQBR M4A1's, which of course would have A2 grips and used for laser designators. I know it's splitting hairs but the CBQR and Mod0 were used by entirely different personnel for different missions. William Hey William, thanks for the info, and good point. Is there any functional difference between the two besides the lowers they were put on? Seems like Mod 0s and CQBR block 1s were almost exactly the same parts? Nope, and yes. I'm pretty sure Crane built the CQBR as well though Augee would be the go to guy for that info. The Mod0 and Mk12 were born of the same parts hence the A1 lowers that were destined for scrap. I've never seen a CQBR in person but handled many a Mod0 on the Erie, CG-70. The question pertaining to rhs side of a CQBR would be yes they have SAFE SEMI AUTO on both sides, as all M16A2 through M4A1 have. One thing I have noticed though is that they are mostly low serial range, W3XXXXX-W4XXXXX. Perhaps they (and the Block II) are from the original SOPMOD program? William |
|
Originally Posted By schaz42:
Nope!! I'm pretty sure Crane built the CQBR as well though Augee would be the go to guy for that info. The Mod0 and Mk12 were born of the same parts hence the A1 lowers that were destined for scrap. I've never seen a CQBR in person but handled many a Mod0 on the Erie, CG-70. The question pertaining to rhs side of a CQBR would be yes they have SAFE SEMI AUTO on both sides, as all M16A2 through M4A1 have. One thing I have noticed though is that they are mostly low serial range, W3XXXXX-W4XXXXX. Perhaps they (and the Block II) are from the original SOPMOD program? William Originally Posted By schaz42:
Originally Posted By TinyCrumb:
Originally Posted By schaz42:
The only grip on Mod0's were A1, they were surplus M16A1 lowers and we had no lasers of any kind, the Mod0 was used on onboard ship for VBSS. Murphy and Axe we not using Mk18's, they used CQBR M4A1's, which of course would have A2 grips and used for laser designators. I know it's splitting hairs but the CBQR and Mod0 were used by entirely different personnel for different missions. William Hey William, thanks for the info, and good point. Is there any functional difference between the two besides the lowers they were put on? Seems like Mod 0s and CQBR block 1s were almost exactly the same parts? Nope!! I'm pretty sure Crane built the CQBR as well though Augee would be the go to guy for that info. The Mod0 and Mk12 were born of the same parts hence the A1 lowers that were destined for scrap. I've never seen a CQBR in person but handled many a Mod0 on the Erie, CG-70. The question pertaining to rhs side of a CQBR would be yes they have SAFE SEMI AUTO on both sides, as all M16A2 through M4A1 have. One thing I have noticed though is that they are mostly low serial range, W3XXXXX-W4XXXXX. Perhaps they (and the Block II) are from the original SOPMOD program? William Thanks William. more programming in the works. |
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320: I apologize to everyone if I am solely responsible for (according to AR-Ryan) "ruining" the original Mk18 thread. I know my "clone" isn't perfect, but I always thought it was close enough (being that it has a color filled lower). Anyway, if it was my fault that things went to hell I am sorry. Just one of those unfortunate series of events. Personally I don't think it was all your fault. Unfortunately I think this will always be an ongoing problem with these types of clones. I totally agree with Augee that some strict definitions and standards need to be set from the get go and in the OP. Otherwise it'll eventually end up just like the other one.
|
Is a Mountain Cur in the Swamp still a Mountain Cur?
|
Originally Posted By TinyCrumb: Hey William, thanks for the info, and good point. Is there any functional difference between the two besides the lowers they were put on? Seems like Mod 0s and CQBR block 1s were almost exactly the same parts? Originally Posted By TinyCrumb: Originally Posted By schaz42: The only grip on Mod0's were A1, they were surplus M16A1 lowers and we had no lasers of any kind, the Mod0 was used on onboard ship for VBSS. Murphy and Axe we not using Mk18's, they used CQBR M4A1's, which of course would have A2 grips and used for laser designators. I know it's splitting hairs but the CBQR and Mod0 were used by entirely different personnel for different missions. William Hey William, thanks for the info, and good point. Is there any functional difference between the two besides the lowers they were put on? Seems like Mod 0s and CQBR block 1s were almost exactly the same parts? I think Block I CQBR's used the RIS instead of the RAS found on Mk18's. At least some of them did. I'm sure Augee or someone else knows the particulars.
|
Is a Mountain Cur in the Swamp still a Mountain Cur?
|
Originally Posted By GreenSwamperin:
I think Block I CQBR's used the RIS instead of the RAS found on Mk18's. At least some of them did. I'm sure Augee or someone else knows the particulars. Originally Posted By GreenSwamperin:
Originally Posted By TinyCrumb:
Originally Posted By schaz42:
The only grip on Mod0's were A1, they were surplus M16A1 lowers and we had no lasers of any kind, the Mod0 was used on onboard ship for VBSS. Murphy and Axe we not using Mk18's, they used CQBR M4A1's, which of course would have A2 grips and used for laser designators. I know it's splitting hairs but the CBQR and Mod0 were used by entirely different personnel for different missions. William Hey William, thanks for the info, and good point. Is there any functional difference between the two besides the lowers they were put on? Seems like Mod 0s and CQBR block 1s were almost exactly the same parts? I think Block I CQBR's used the RIS instead of the RAS found on Mk18's. At least some of them did. I'm sure Augee or someone else knows the particulars. I think they both used the RIS, bound to be a mix of them somewhere though. William |
|
Originally Posted By schaz42:
The only grip on Mod0's were A1, they were surplus M16A1 lowers and we had no lasers of any kind, the Mod0 was used on onboard ship for VBSS. Murphy and Axe we not using Mk18's, they used CQBR M4A1's, which of course would have A2 grips and used for laser designators. I know it's splitting hairs but the CBQR and Mod0 were used by entirely different personnel for different missions. William Originally Posted By schaz42:
Originally Posted By LongTrang:
Originally Posted By TinyCrumb:
Originally Posted By schaz42:
• Laser: none on Mk18 Mod0 Updated the errors, thanks! You sure about the PEQ-2 though? I thought for sure I've seen quite a few in the wild Mod 0s with PEQ-2s. In addition to peq 2's add the peq5 visible laser. When you study the MK 18's of Murph and Axe, they are using them since the peq 2 was IR only. Also, I have a pic a fella running a DBAL. The only grip on Mod0's were A1, they were surplus M16A1 lowers and we had no lasers of any kind, the Mod0 was used on onboard ship for VBSS. Murphy and Axe we not using Mk18's, they used CQBR M4A1's, which of course would have A2 grips and used for laser designators. I know it's splitting hairs but the CBQR and Mod0 were used by entirely different personnel for different missions. William They look the same to me..... But hey....learn something new everyday. |
|
Originally Posted By Splittiebus66:
M961 for your mod 0 list :) classic pics http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0603/Ekie12091941/Govt%20Carbines/qstnw0.jpg http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/4671/mk18mod01zv4.jpg That's actually a M962, not a M961, as it has the ARMS quick detach feature. The pic of the Navy arms room one also has a Surefire SW02 tail cap. |
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
CQBR Block I: http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd222/chrisu5/Ax1.jpg http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/3e/d9/34/3ed934fb92e37326c06bd1153ef4c240.jpg http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/8610/post861256055772.jpg Mk18 Mod 0: http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/Midshipmen-Activities/abg.sized.jpg http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/3659/mk182cj5.jpg http://www.americanspecialops.com/images/photos/navy-seals/seal-mk18-hr.jpg Ok. Please someone help me understand this...comparing the base rifles (no accessories) what is the difference between a mod0 and a CQBR block 1? Is it the receiver? Auto vs burst? A2 hider vs nt4? I'm not trying to be an ass....i reallly want to know. I have wanting to clone axes rifle for some time now. |
|
Originally Posted By LongTrang: Ok. Please someone help me understand this...comparing the base rifles (no accessories) what is the difference between a mod0 and a CQBR block 1? Is it the receiver? Auto vs burst? A2 hider vs nt4? I'm not trying to be an ass....i reallly want to know. I have wanting to clone axes rifle for some time now. Originally Posted By LongTrang: Originally Posted By wayfaerer320: CQBR Block I: http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd222/chrisu5/Ax1.jpg http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/3e/d9/34/3ed934fb92e37326c06bd1153ef4c240.jpg http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/8610/post861256055772.jpg Mk18 Mod 0: http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/Midshipmen-Activities/abg.sized.jpg http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/3659/mk182cj5.jpg http://www.americanspecialops.com/images/photos/navy-seals/seal-mk18-hr.jpg Ok. Please someone help me understand this...comparing the base rifles (no accessories) what is the difference between a mod0 and a CQBR block 1? Is it the receiver? Auto vs burst? A2 hider vs nt4? I'm not trying to be an ass....i reallly want to know. I have wanting to clone axes rifle for some time now. I could be wrong, but I think the main difference is that the Mk18 Mod 0 is a complete weapon system - it was designed to be a complete rifle. Where as the CQBR is more of an upper that is an accessory piece (or replacement upper) in the SOPMOD kit - meaning, you've got a 14.5" upper and a 10.3" upper to use with the same lower. EDIT: Also, like the Mk12, the Mk18 Mod 0 is built on an M16A1 lower - the CQBRs would be M4A1 lower receivers |
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
I could be wrong, but I think the main difference is that the Mk18 Mod 0 is a complete weapon system - it was designed to be a complete rifle. Where as the CQBR is more of an upper that is an accessory piece (or replacement upper) in the SOPMOD kit - meaning, you've got a 14.5" upper and a 10.3" upper to use with the same lower. EDIT: Also, like the Mk12, the Mk18 Mod 0 is built on an M16A1 lower - the CQBRs would be M4A1 lower receivers Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
Originally Posted By LongTrang:
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320:
CQBR Block I: http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd222/chrisu5/Ax1.jpg http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/3e/d9/34/3ed934fb92e37326c06bd1153ef4c240.jpg http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/8610/post861256055772.jpg Mk18 Mod 0: http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/Midshipmen-Activities/abg.sized.jpg http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/3659/mk182cj5.jpg http://www.americanspecialops.com/images/photos/navy-seals/seal-mk18-hr.jpg Ok. Please someone help me understand this...comparing the base rifles (no accessories) what is the difference between a mod0 and a CQBR block 1? Is it the receiver? Auto vs burst? A2 hider vs nt4? I'm not trying to be an ass....i reallly want to know. I have wanting to clone axes rifle for some time now. I could be wrong, but I think the main difference is that the Mk18 Mod 0 is a complete weapon system - it was designed to be a complete rifle. Where as the CQBR is more of an upper that is an accessory piece (or replacement upper) in the SOPMOD kit - meaning, you've got a 14.5" upper and a 10.3" upper to use with the same lower. EDIT: Also, like the Mk12, the Mk18 Mod 0 is built on an M16A1 lower - the CQBRs would be M4A1 lower receivers Pretty much this ^ The Mod0 is afaik only used by the Navy onboard ship, the CQBR is seen with a host of accessories which we did not have when using the Mod0. A flashlight (M962) and a sling is all I was ever given. William |
|
Originally Posted By wayfaerer320: Here's some more from the same set of images - title of the set is "U.S. Army Special Operations Command 2012 Capabilities Exercise, April 20." And close ups of the Glocks: I thought CQBR's used flash hiders?
|
|
WTH I go off the grid for a weekend and come back to fine my favorite thread nuked!
So who went full retard? Now that I vented... What is the "official" threshold for clone worthyness? I trashed my Wilcox mount cuz I thought it sucked and swapped for a Larue. I didn't want to spend $300 on a 962 light and use a Streamlight. It's a lot brighter than my buddies 961. Which comes in handy when lighting up a distant tree line looking for coyotes. The problem is i use my Mod 0 clone, it's not a "safe queen" or just a "range toy". My muzzle device is wrong also. I use a YHM can as I've not felt like spending $1500 vs $500 for a can because it has dimples and is "more" correct. The old thread did not step on me because I had the basics. Where does the new thread stand? Does it have to be 100%, working towards 100%...? Check • Barrel: 10.3 Colt Government profile with .70 gas port Colt 6921 upper chopped to 10.5" Check • Rail: Knights Armament M4 RAS Nope • Muzzle Device: Knights Armament NT4 Flash Hider Why is the A2 not listed? Well I run a YHM... Check • Front Sight: A2 FSP Check • Rear Sight: LMT Check • Optic: Aimpoint CompM2 Nope • Optic Mount: Wilcox I thought the Wilcox sucked... Tired of using locktight, switched to Larue Check • Stock: LMT SOPMOD Gen 1 Black Not a B5 knockoff Nope • Grip: A1 I have A1 and A2 grips but prefer the MOE Nope • Light: Surefire M952 Not spending $300 on a M962 running a Streamlight Nope • Supressor: Knights Armament NT4 I saved over $1000 and use a YHM not an small amount to me... Yeah I run the wrong trigger guard also.... 
How it sits now... 
And this was purely a dress up pic 
Dang it had an ASAP on it... |
Mk 18 / CQBR (Page 2 of 1609)
AR Sponsor
Join the Community
Your next conversation starts here.
Create your free account to join discussions, share your experience, save topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.
- Join discussions
- Follow topics and replies
- Connect with fellow enthusiasts
Already a member? Sign in
Stay informed by subscribing to our Newsletter