Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
7/10/2011 4:34:51 AM EDT
Took this AR in on trade. Can anyone help with identifying.



7/10/2011 4:44:42 AM EDT
[#1]
EDIT   Never mind...
7/10/2011 9:28:03 AM EDT
[#2]
Looks like an early 90's Colt A2 Sporter lower (with the sear block) with a Colt 6920 upper.
7/10/2011 9:35:09 AM EDT
[#3]
A well constructed franken rifle.
7/10/2011 10:39:09 AM EDT
[#4]
Colt 1/9 twist. Older civilian M4 barrel
7/10/2011 3:38:49 PM EDT
[#5]
What they said
plus
Castle nut is backwards,   and I bet not tight or staked. Assembled by a fool, or an honest mistake???
From this indicator I'd check it real close.
7/10/2011 4:57:53 PM EDT
[#6]
Total junk. Send it to me and I'll throw it out for you
7/10/2011 5:03:02 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Looks like an early 90's Colt A2 Sporter lower (with the sear block) with a Colt 6920 6922 upper.


Fixed it.  I don't think Colt made very many of those uppers, you don't see them all that often

7/10/2011 8:41:18 PM EDT
[#8]
I like the upper, I like the lower. I'm not sure what's going on with the front pivot pin. .315" to .250" adapter?
7/10/2011 8:59:10 PM EDT
[#9]
What they all said.  6550/6551 lower with a 6922 upper assembly,  or more likely an M4 upper receiver with a 6922 barrel attached.  Note the absence of proof marks on the upper receiver, indicating it is likely not a factory built upper assembly from that period.  While 6922 uppers were uncommon, the barrels themselves were much more plentiful than 6920 barrels.  At that time (mid 90's),  1/7  twist barrels were not yet desirable in the civilian market like they are now.  The majority of barrels sold by Colt were 1/9.

ETA:  Almost certainly a non-factory-assembled upper.  A period-correct upper should have a large pivot hole.  Given the backward castle nut, I'd be suspicious of the assembly of the rifle.
7/11/2011 2:47:58 AM EDT
[#10]
Thanks everyone for the replies!
AR Sponsor