From my understanding the wylde chamber improves accuracy, but also accommodates both .223 and 5.56. Well whats the down side then?
Posted: 8/30/2008 12:42:58 PM EDT
[#1]
I have noticed any down side to it.
Posted: 8/30/2008 1:14:07 PM EDT
[#2]
for a civilian owned gun I wish all mine were Wylde chambered....<><....:)
Posted: 8/30/2008 2:42:30 PM EDT
[#3]
The downside is that most factory Wylde chambers are more or less a bit loose .223 chambers. Ned Christiansen has an excellent article in this issue of SWAT on how a true 5.56 doesn't hurt practical accuracy while providing reliability.
Posted: 8/30/2008 3:09:57 PM EDT
[#4]
i looked before i bought mine and could not find and proven cons to it.
Posted: 8/30/2008 3:18:34 PM EDT
[#5]
the english in this thread is making my head hurt.
Posted: 8/30/2008 3:59:31 PM EDT
[#6]
Zero problems with the Wylde chambers that I own.
Posted: 8/30/2008 7:31:16 PM EDT
[#7]
I've heard that the throat in the Wylde chamber is cut deeper than that of a .223 or 5.56. Has anyone here measured the freebore in a Wylde chambered barrel?
