Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
4/1/2008 3:52:05 PM EDT
I'm in search of a AR-15 and I would like to hear people's pro's and con's on which one they would own between Bushmaster or DPMS and model. All comments are welcome thanks.
4/1/2008 4:16:48 PM EDT
[#1]
my vote would be for bushmaster but IMO it just comes down to personal preferance as the quality of these are again, IMO, dead even...
4/1/2008 4:27:11 PM EDT
[#2]
I think that they both are similar in quality, but DPMS may be a little hungrier in that they would like to displace Bushmaster as the largest civilian manufacturer, so they would tend to edge Bushmaster out in terms of price. Also DPMS has a three year warranty, while Bushmaster only offers one year. So I vote DPMS.
4/1/2008 4:55:15 PM EDT
[#3]
I think DPMS is the bottom of the barrel since 5.56 NATO chambers and chrome lined barrels aren't standard on their guns.
4/1/2008 4:56:36 PM EDT
[#4]
At last weekend's show in Southwestern Pennsylvania, the best AR prices I could find was a DPMS, at $650.  "Show Special"  This was either flat top or fixed carry handle.  NOT a chrome lined barrel, but sheesh.... $650!  Fantastic.

Jerry.
4/1/2008 5:35:11 PM EDT
[#5]
Bushmaster for sure but I've been hearing decent things about DPMS LATELY, but I use to hear bad things a few years back
4/1/2008 5:40:30 PM EDT
[#6]
My vote would be for DPMS

The last year or two DPMS have changed somethings and or now building a lot better rifle

I don't like the chrome line barrels
4/1/2008 5:42:37 PM EDT
[#7]
Bushmaster is better than DPMS  for basic carbines. However if I were getting a varmint rifle then Id go with a DPMS.

Carbines = Bushmaster
Varmint = DPMS
4/1/2008 6:18:16 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
I don't like the chrome line barrels


eh??? no likey chrome lined???
4/1/2008 6:23:16 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
I think DPMS is the bottom of the barrel since 5.56 NATO chambers and chrome lined barrels aren't standard on their guns.

+1
4/1/2008 6:29:49 PM EDT
[#10]
IMHO, DPMS, hands down...

I own a DPMS 16" w/ a chrome lined govt profile barrel and is chambered in 5.56
4/1/2008 6:37:27 PM EDT
[#11]
The Bushie will cost more but like previous posts said, has chrome lined barrel and chamber. Chrome is more resistant to bad elements than steel.

The DPMS will cost less, have a regular steel barrel and chamber, properly cleaned and taken care of  steel barrels are what we all have used for years and years on other rifles.

I don't feel you will go wrong with either choice....
4/2/2008 4:56:26 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
IMHO, DPMS, hands down...

I own a DPMS 16" w/ a chrome lined govt profile barrel and is chambered in 5.56


+1
4/2/2008 4:59:18 AM EDT
[#13]
I have owned two bushies and a DPMS. I kept the DPMS. DPMS gets my vote!
4/2/2008 5:36:39 AM EDT
[#14]
loooove my bushmaster
4/2/2008 7:03:55 AM EDT
[#15]
Here is my next question which model would you purchase and why.Trying to decide is a little hard on just one.
4/2/2008 7:36:52 AM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
Here is my next question which model would you purchase and why.Trying to decide is a little hard on just one.


I highly recomend the DPMS Lite 16

4/2/2008 7:40:57 AM EDT
[#17]
DPMS is not an inferior company because they offer models without chrome lining and NATO chambers.  Quite the contrary.  They offer more options to those who don't want or need those features.  Like for people who want an accurate M4 configuration.

Compare the models with the SAME feature and you'll find only one appreciable difference.  Bushmaster chrome lined barrels are made with CMV, while DPMS is made with 4140.  That won't make a big difference to most people, but in the long run it's a decided advantage.

Bushmaster's been the top dog for a while, but DPMS has done more for the proliferation of the black rifle in the civilian market than all other makers combined.  Their QC has markedly improved over the last few years, and they currently make M4s as nice as any of the 4140 crowd.

I'd take the Bushmaster for the barrel alone because it's what's important to me.  However, BM seems to have forgotten what staking is, so check your gas key whichever you choose.  You'll be equally happy with either.
4/2/2008 2:43:55 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
DPMS is not an inferior company because they offer models without chrome lining and NATO chambers.  Quite the contrary.  They offer more options to those who don't want or need those features.  Like for people who want an accurate M4 configuration.

Compare the models with the SAME feature and you'll find only one appreciable difference.  Bushmaster chrome lined barrels are made with CMV, while DPMS is made with 4140.  That won't make a big difference to most people, but in the long run it's a decided advantage.

Bushmaster's been the top dog for a while, but DPMS has done more for the proliferation of the black rifle in the civilian market than all other makers combined.  Their QC has markedly improved over the last few years, and they currently make M4s as nice as any of the 4140 crowd.

I'd take the Bushmaster for the barrel alone because it's what's important to me.  However, BM seems to have forgotten what staking is, so check your gas key whichever you choose.  You'll be equally happy with either.


An accurate "M4 configuration" can be had with chrome lining and 5.56 NATO chambers.  I agree about the staking though, the only decent staked keys I own are LMT and Armalite.  I think people make a bigger deal about staking then is necessary though.  I think the Bushmaster M4-type carbine at $800 (yes, you can find them that cheap) is a bargain.  I wouldn't buy a non-chrome lined .223 chambered DPMS for $650 just to save a few bucks.
4/2/2008 2:54:02 PM EDT
[#19]
I built my DPMS for $650.00 and I love it. it shoots tight and went together smoothly.
I'd build another without hesitation.

4/2/2008 2:59:25 PM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
DPMS is not an inferior company because they offer models without chrome lining and NATO chambers.  Quite the contrary.  They offer more options to those who don't want or need those features.  Like for people who want an accurate M4 configuration.

Compare the models with the SAME feature and you'll find only one appreciable difference.  Bushmaster chrome lined barrels are made with CMV, while DPMS is made with 4140.  That won't make a big difference to most people, but in the long run it's a decided advantage.

Bushmaster's been the top dog for a while, but DPMS has done more for the proliferation of the black rifle in the civilian market than all other makers combined.  Their QC has markedly improved over the last few years, and they currently make M4s as nice as any of the 4140 crowd......

.....


I would have to agree. My DPMS Panther Carbine is contructed as well as any other AR I have and I have a few (7). Since I do not own a Bushy, I can say nothing against them. I do prefer other ARs though.

4/2/2008 3:18:34 PM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:
Bushmaster is better than DPMS  for basic carbines. However if I were getting a varmint rifle then Id go with a DPMS.

Carbines = Bushmaster
Varmint = DPMS


i can agree w/ this...
4/2/2008 3:28:58 PM EDT
[#22]
I have a 16" AP4 DPMS rifle, my first rifle, but I have added 2 more to that although they are not DPMS. But I would by another one without hesitation. Mine has been 100% reliable and accurate from day one.
4/2/2008 3:30:13 PM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bushmaster is better than DPMS  for basic carbines. However if I were getting a varmint rifle then Id go with a DPMS.

Carbines = Bushmaster
Varmint = DPMS


i can agree w/ this...


I used to almost agree till my freind bought the Bushy below
Its awfull- fit & finish make it look like a airsoft


BTW- it came as dry as a bone, if i had'nt took it to site in the scope & thought to take a look see it mite not be alive today
4/2/2008 3:35:09 PM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bushmaster is better than DPMS  for basic carbines. However if I were getting a varmint rifle then Id go with a DPMS.

Carbines = Bushmaster
Varmint = DPMS


i can agree w/ this...


I used to almost agree till my freind bought the Bushy below
Its awfull- fit & finish make it look like a airsoft

img.photobucket.com/albums/v610/hossfly692000/ass.jpg
BTW- it came as dry as a bone, if i had'nt took it to site in the scope & thought to take a look see it mite not be alive today


Looks like it got into a fight with Atari and lost.    That looks like shit.
4/2/2008 3:41:17 PM EDT
[#25]
i dont know i own a dpms and i havent had any problems with it. plus they are cheaper in price range than bushmaster. i like!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4/2/2008 3:43:52 PM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
Bushmaster is better than DPMS  for basic carbines. However if I were getting a varmint rifle then Id go with a DPMS.

Carbines = Bushmaster
Varmint = DPMS


i can agree w/ this...


I used to almost agree till my freind bought the Bushy below
Its awfull- fit & finish make it look like a airsoft

img.photobucket.com/albums/v610/hossfly692000/ass.jpg
BTW- it came as dry as a bone, if i had'nt took it to site in the scope & thought to take a look see it mite not be alive today


Looks like it got into a fight with Atari and lost.    That looks like shit.


Don't it tho
4/3/2008 3:20:02 PM EDT
[#27]
Bushys on both sides of the DPMS and an FN for kicks. It is my first DPMS and I have two more on the way. The DPMS rifles are hands down the better of the two, the fit , the accuracy and the PRICE!
http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k51/rgcansler/IMG_3058jpg1mod.jpg
4/3/2008 5:35:14 PM EDT
[#28]
I'm getting ready to buy a DPMS from PK Firearms.  Check out a complete lower receiver and complete upper!
htlift.gif
4/3/2008 6:16:20 PM EDT
[#29]
I've seen some crappy guns put out by DPMS, Bushmaster is leaps and bounds ahead of them in quality
4/3/2008 6:16:57 PM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:
I'm getting ready to buy a DPMS from PK Firearms.  Check out a complete lower receiver and complete upper!


Will it go well with your STi?

I'd like to add I currently own both, and I'm happy with both. I probably prefer Bushmaster slightly more, but really, both are fine.
4/3/2008 6:28:05 PM EDT
[#31]
In this comparison, my vote goes for the snake, as their fit and finish is a bit nicer from the bushies I've owned and the DPMS that I've shot. Bushy also has a standard chrome-lined barrel, while DPMS does not in every model.
AR Sponsor