AR Sponsor
Probable, but unlikely. Look here |
|
Those are typical. The one on the left looks like my Mega's. The one on the left looks like an older lower I had. It is just a difference in what the shop does to machine them. Both are finished, but some shops carry the process a little further. The top of threaded section, where the buffer tube screws in, on the one on the left again looks like Mega. The one on the right looks the the lowers I had from Spikes. I can't remember if Spikes looked like the one on the right in the channel where the selector goes through. |
Thought so, I love em... Good luck with your project(s), and post pics when you are done. |
|
The last Colt school I was the one of the Colt reps. mentioned that the rear was probably going to be seen in the future as a way of differenciating AR-15 and M-16. The idea was that the basic garage guy could not simply drill a current receiver and fit the auto/burst sear. It was 2006 so I'm not 100% sure so hold off on the flammmmming if I'm wrong. I also love the MEGA!!! Brian at MEGA is the bomb! |
I have P-mags, but on that one I'll most likely use NHMTG and Stoner Mags....your right the magwell is not as clean as the Mega |
Since we have more or less idenified this thing........ lets just say it was made for Sikes Tactical, would a CMT M4 "Type Upper" fit up and match well with this lower? I have very succesfully built out a couple and have projects in the works, but this one throwing me a bit of a curve ..... looking for positive input. First two builds: ![]() ![]() ![]() The Mega receivers in Desert Tan are not built out yet ..... they have been vaccum sealed and stored away for another time ...... |
I prefer Megas also, I'm just trying to match quality with quality.....a sincere thanks for the input. Nevadasun |
AR Sponsor




