User Panel
I thought .... oh nevermind. I still would like to get my hands on what scottryan is asking for. |
||
|
Now that its been pointed out, the fatness under the FSB does look a little odd. |
||
|
Unfortunately, that's the only way to get a proper "F" height front sight base on a lightweight barrel. There are no 0.625" bore diameter "F" height sight bases out there. I know that the "Look" is far more important than the function, and that extra 1 ounce of weight is really a killer... |
|
|
Here we go again, attack an argument with the ever popular "well we know how looks are so important." Sorry but looks matter to me. Just like women, they all cook and give birth, but do I just settle for the one that does this the best? No, looks matter. |
||
|
The solution is quite simple then. Buy a Colt or Bushmaster lightweight barrel. Shorten it to 14.5" or 15" and permenant attach whatever muzzle device you desire. I do this all the time. $50 to shorten and thread the muzzle. $20 to permenant attach. Shop Services Turn-around time is typically 1 weekend, in by thursday, out by tuesday. Comes out like Forest's 16" barrel: |
|
|
I want one. So, can I buy a BM LW in 1:7 or not? |
||
|
Incorrect answer retracted after Forest corrected me below. Back to the Colt LW barrel it is... BARREL & FRONT SIGHT ASSY AR6520, 1/7 LWT - 16in CHROME LINED Shorten that and you are good to go. |
|
|
Warning - what Randall isn't telling you that his crown job will improve the accuracy of the barrel.
Sadly you cannot. BM only makes A2 and M4 type 1:7 barrels, not the LW. Best you can do is buy a 14.5" 1:7 M4 and have the forward section turned down to LW profile. |
||
|
I have one of these and the reduced dust signature and muzzle compensation aint gonna happen. Neither is the snagging, but I like the clean look of the 5C1 better. |
|
|
Did you read pages 1 and 2 of this thread? |
|
|
Ok, I would like everyone to concentrate on getting something going on these barrel instead of giving halfway options that we already know about.
We don't want a cutdown 16" LW barrel as the step before the threads will not be present. Bushmaster only makes 1/7 in M4 and 20" Govt profiles. Also, F marked FSBs are not that important right now. I just want to see if we have any options. |
|
I'll check with Shaw tomorrow to see what it would take to knock out 100 of these. And on that step before the threads, are you talking about the one in the picture of the bushmaster barrel on the marble table? I added that shoulder, the muzzle is threaded for an inch and the step-up spacer threads on. With a 0.625" FSB bore, you can't have a shoulder any larger than 0.625" or you can't get the FSB on the barrel. Lightweight barrels threaded 1/2"-28 have a very small shoulder, so small that an A2 comp with the big bevel on the back actually tightens past the shoulder and the bevel mashes against the shoulder. I did read the first two pages, but since you are asking me, what did I miss that you wanted to point out? |
|
|
All LW barrel have a shoulder behind the threads. F marked .625" FSB exist. RED: I already know this. LW barrels are .625 under the FSB then step down to .570", then step back up to .625 at the shoulder before the threads. |
||
|
'Exist' and 'Available' are different things. I was speaking about availability as mere existence does us no good if you can't buy them. If you are aware of where I can get about 100 of these, please let me know so I can get this project started. |
|
|
I would check to see how Bravo Company gets those F stamped FSB for .750" that they sell individually.
|
|
Don't confuse a collectable with an investment. They are not synonyms. |
||
|
Perfect specifications:
14.7" LW, 1/7", chrome lined barrel (allows perm attachment of A2 and longer FHs for 16"+ OAL) 0.625 under the HGs 0.625 under the FSB 0.570 forward of the FSB 0.625 shoulder behind threads Includes: 0.625 A2 FSB, 0.625 HG cap, barrel nut, M4 receiver extension Options: 0.625 "F" marked FSB, HG cap delete, perm install of FH of your choice. |
|
It properly has to mount a bayonet, besides a phantom is better than an A2 flash suppressor |
|
|
Not acceptable. |
|
|
These last 3 posts are exactly why projects like this never get off the ground.
You got a pretty good idea what you want, but everyone wants JUST one thing done different, therefore, no matter what you design and build, only 1/3 of the people that said "I'm in" earlier are actually going to go along with it in the end. What they were really "in" for was the $99 barrel that was EXACTLY what THEY wanted. Take the 14.5" vs 14.7" as a perfect example. I have an idea where I can make a 14.7" barrel that can have an A2 permenant attached for legality. Now, for those that actually want to affix a bayonet, I can make a simple little sleeve spacer that goes on the muzzle before the muzzle device. This little sleeve would come back over the stepped up area and provide a proper 0.860" diameter for a bayonet. Will I do this? Probably not because everyone will shit on it because it's not exactly what THEY want. Is it a good idea to solve everyone's wants with a simple 14.7" barrel? Yes. There will always be that 1/3 who still won't buy it because it does not look perfect. Those are the same guys that won't just get over it and buy a lightweight CMMG with a 0.750" FSB... You guys amaze me. I spent a couple hours today working on all the details for a proper drawing to submit to Shaw and now I feel like quitting before I really dig myself into a hole. No call back from CMT about 0.625" FSB's, they are probably closed for the holidays like smart people. The other unknown is 0.625" round handguard caps. Gotta source those, $6 from bushmaster is wacked. If it wasn't for the FSB's, this project would be a slam dunk. Of course, that's why the other makers have not done it. Heck, for all I know, these barrels are coming off the production line now from some other maker. By the time I get mine made, y'all will have already bought them and leave me stuck holding $14,000 in barrels that nobody wants because they were just the fad of the week and everyone has theirs now. Sorry for the rant, it's just frustrating. If you guys are really serious about wanting a barrel like this thread talks about, please let me know so I can regain some faith. Here's what I propose: 14.7" chrome lined 5.56 chamber and chrome bore, M4 ramped barrel extension, carbine located "F" height gas block, 0.875" over the chamber, dropping to 0.650" then tapering to 0.625" just before the FSB shoulder, then dropping to 0.570" straight to the 0.620" step before a 1/2"-28 threaded muzzle. M4 extension works on all receivers, no need for standard ramps. The taller FSB is the way to go, those of you with A2 receivers can shorten the sight post easier than those with flattops can raise the post and there are probably a LOT more flattop builders than A2 builders. 14.7" with a shoulder spacer for the few of you that want bayonet compatibility is the best option in my opinion. I think the vast majority will say they want a phantom, but then go with an A2 because of price. The $30 phantom vs the $5 A2 is a consideration for many, especially you guys that want it for $99 and there are a bunch of you out there |
|
That sounds great. Except for one thing. I believe most of the people posting here are looking for a *visibly* correct period reproduction part. Hope that helps. ETA: I'm looking to build an XM177E2 clone. But I'd also like to integrate modern technology where it would be beneficial without detracting from the visible appearance. |
|
|
As stated above you can count me in for one or two. I had two uppers with the 1 in 7 pencil barrel with no flash hider. A local machine shop threaded one of the uppers. Like you said there's not enough material for a washer. I really don't like the look either. I sold this upper to a friend for his boy and now another friend wants one. I'm looking for light weight. I will watch this thread or email me with details. Thanks for working on this |
|
|
Since we decided the option for a bayonet is gay, why not run these in midlength. I think a featherweight midlength is the cat's ass. And everyone with a middy will agree. Just throwing it out there.
|
|
RED: I am not being unreasonable or hard to work with. All I am asking for is a remake of a standard barrel that has existed for 20 years. BLUE: 14.7" is not acceptable. Still not getting the point of the thread. We want a standard barrel with no extra BS. No attached stuff. Bushmaster is getting their .625 FSB from somewhere. So can we. |
|
|
Scott, you want no attached stuff per your last comment. You planning on using this barrel for a SBR? If not then 14.7 with A2 is closer to milspec than a vortex on a 14.5.
|
|
I hate to rag on you Scott, but if you're a "COLT EXPERT" then why can't YOU tell US where COLT gets thier .625 fsb's? The 5/8 FSB is the problem, everything else is just numbers....... |
|
|
A 14.5" with SDI is closer to milspec. I dont' want some attached contraption to mount a bayonet. |
|
|
Hey the thread asked for a 14.5" barrel, besides, if your going to pay for what will basically be an expensive barrel COMPARED to mass produced ones what is 25 bucks more? |
|
|
RED: I know you are not being unreasonable. Wanting is fine, getting is another thing. For me to put $12K to $15K out building 100 barrels, I have to be sure that at least 3/4 of them are going to sell in a reasonable time. This means I have to try to please as many people as I can with a compromised product. I know, it sucks, but it's the reality of the marketplace. BLUE: While you may want a 14.5" barrel, do 80% of people want that as well? If so, then that's what I will make to satisfy the market. I just don't know yet. Most barrels currently being sold as a complete assembly will come with an A2 hanging off the end of them. The 14.5/14.7 causes a particular problem. You gotta permenant attach SOMETHING to it, be it a $5 A2 or a $30 phantom before it's legal. I would think that most guys will want to buy the barrel with that already done as they are probably not equipped to do it themselves. If it turns out that most guys don't care to spend the extra money on a phantom or vortex, then it also makes sense to make the barrels 14.7" and use the cheaper A2's. Otherwise, we have to use "extra BS attached stuff" like a 2nd crush washer or an SDI extended A2 or a Phantom or Vortex. Since I will probably have to do the permenant attach work on a order-by-order basis, it's easy enough to put a special sleeved spacer on the barrels that are ordered to work with a Bayonet. Question to the market: how many of you place bayonet compatibility higher on your list than being able to use a standard A2 comp instead of a more expensive SDI A2, Phantom or Vortex? Bushmaster FSB is A2 height. I think it's best to pursue "F" height 0.625" forgings. That "if you are gonna do it, do it right" mentality rears up again... Would you suggest that simply offering an A2 height FSB and extended sight posts on request is the better path? |
|
|
Could they just turn down the part in between the FSB and leave two humps where the FSB attaches? |
|
|
I have done this as well. It still looks out-of-proportion. You end up with the FAT front sight base with what appears to be a lightweight barrel through the middle. There's this fugly space where the bayo lug hangs down as well. |
|
|
Ya I guess that would look odd from the front then, really odd. |
||
|
Randall, thanks for exploring the production of this barrel. Thanks for also adopting my recommendation of the 14.7" barrel length. I will continue to advocate the A2 0.625 FSB. FYI, you can also get the HG caps from Specialized Armament.
"Colt Expert"--You can't handle a non-mil-spec 0.2" extra on the end of your barrel yet you are perfectly comfortable with a more expensive, non-mil-spec, extended A2-like flash hider? That's your argument for not being able to use the most popular, inexpensive, and mil-spec flash hider available for the AR-15? Just want to make sure that we are clear on this point. |
|
Not meaning to speak for scottryan, but I think you might be assuming a bit much there. I see his comments as offering alternatives for people concerned about not having the extra length, not necessarily what his use was going to be. Besides, I would prefer the correct length as I'm sure other people that don't mind going the SBR route, if that's their choice. Also, there are other FH options than just A2/Phantom/Vortex. ETA: For my particular application, the extra bit won't make or break my project. Given a choice, I vote for the correct length 14.5" barrel. |
|
|
As pointed out by the Randall, 14.7" is more likely to sell and therefore be built in the first place.
If you guys decide on 14.5" good fucking luck trying to find someone to make and sell these barrels. I really don't care if it's 14.5 or 14.7"--I just want to see this animal get built. |
|
That has to be one of the most retarded comments I have ever heard. What about all the 14.5" Colt SOCOM barrels people are/were jumping through hoops to get? What about the 14.5" barrel bushmaster sells that everyone has? Bushmaster even uses this barrel on their most popular factory gun with a perm affix muzzle device. What about people paying $400 to $500 for a real Colt 1/7 LW barrel? Or all the 14.5" options CMMG sells? You don't think their is a market for 14.5" barrels? |
|
|
Show me a pic of your LW 14.5" barrel when you get it produced. I won't hold my breath.
Don't try comparing the popularity of a 14.5" Colt M4 barrel to a small run of 14.5" LWs from a lesser known manufacturer. |
|
I don't suppose then CMMG and Bravo Company don't sell any of their 14.5" barrels? |
|
|
I wasn't aware CMMG and Bravo made mil-spec 14.5" LW barrels. If they did, we wouldn't be having this thread, now would we?
|
|
Why all the negativity, Moriarity? |
|
|
I want a 14.7 to hell with Scott.
I already have my 14.5 Colts so I don't need one. No you guys cannot have any of mine. If you have to ask how much you don't have enough money. Scott for as much grief your getting just go buy a Colt. You can find them for 250 you just have to look harder. |
|
You said 14.5" wouldn't sell as well as 14.7". This is wrong. What does barrel profile have to do with it? 14.5" will always outsell 14.7" because it is a standard length reguardless of the barrel profile. |
|
|
I look for this stuff everyday, several times a day. I have found much rarer Colt parts than these LW barrels. I'm looking plenty hard. I have never seen one of these LW barrels go that low. |
|
|
No shit. I dont understand what is wrong with asking for a standard barrel that has existed for a longer period to time than most of these "know it alls" on this site. |
|
|
I would buy this barrel at either length. My build would be a little cheaper with the 14.7", but I really want a LW barrel for a new project.
Obviously, cost is important to all of us. Otherwise, we'd pay the big $$$ for a Colt or buy the 16" BM (in 1:7) and have it hacked off. Using the non-F FSB doesn't change the profile of the gun at all - just buy the taller post. But, either length and either FSB is OK for me. I'll buy one! ETA: Turning my AR into a pointy stick is not a desireable feature to me, but it is to many. I'm neutral on bayonet attachment. But I wouldn't want something strange looking out there simply to allow it. I'd rather have a 14.5" barrel and a longer FH that would facilitate the bayo. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.