Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
AR Sponsor
4/3/2005 2:52:23 PM EDT
I have an 11.5 pencil barrel that gets about 5" at 100 yards. What kinds of groups are people getting at 100 yards with sub M4 length barrels? I'm looking for info on  barrels int he 8" to 12" range, profile non specific. Please include ammo type info as well. I'm not looking to start a debate on SHTF gear, just looking for general data.
4/3/2005 5:38:30 PM EDT
[#1]
Well, I can play in this topic truthfully.

7.5" DPMS 1x9...  1 1/2" at 100 with cheap 3-9x40 Tasco,  52gr HP Hornady in WCC cases and 748 powder.

11.5" Bushmaster 1x9 (1989 barrel),  same ammo/results as above.

12" SS DPMS 1x9 bull barrel cut from a 16" bull,  have not even messed with it.
4/3/2005 5:42:55 PM EDT
[#2]
11.5" BM 1/9  Getting 1 1/2" at 100 yds with irons from a bench rest.. I mostly shoot this gun inside though, and I get 1/2" at 25 yds. mostly..
4/3/2005 5:45:14 PM EDT
[#3]
LMT 10.5 with an acog 1 inch groups
4/4/2005 12:36:07 AM EDT
[#4]
DPMS 11.5" 1-9 non-chromed bore -  2" groups @100 yards with LC XM193 and Aimpoint ML2
DPMS 11.5" 1-9 non-chromed bore -  1.75" groups @100 yards with Radway Green 62 gr (British milsurp) Aimpoint ML2
DPMS 11.5" 1-9 non-chromed bore - 4" groups@100 yards with Wolf 62 gr FMJ. Aimpoint ML2


4/4/2005 3:15:58 AM EDT
[#5]
all of those reports are far better than I would have guessed.

Hell, 1.5" is about the width of a sternum.

I know it is an accuracy question, but I suspect much of the credit (of those reports) would go to the shooter, as much as it would the weapon.

4/4/2005 3:40:47 AM EDT
[#6]
Barrel length has NOTHING to do with accuracy. Ever wonder how high end 1911 builders can guarantee 1.5" groups at 50yds from a 5" barrel?
4/4/2005 3:51:00 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
all of those reports are far better than I would have guessed.

Hell, 1.5" is about the width of a sternum.

I know it is an accuracy question, but I suspect much of the credit (of those reports) would go to the shooter, as much as it would the weapon.




+1

these guys shoot a hell of a lot more than i do.

i'm lucky to pull those groups with my 20" a2!
4/4/2005 4:03:48 AM EDT
[#8]
You're partially correct here. Remember that a bullets are designed to stabilize out of a barrel at a specific velocity. A perfect example of this is the 230 FMJ bullet I'm required to use to shoot CMP 'leg' matches. Many shooters load a very light .45 wadcutter round for better controlability in bullseye, but the 230 FMJ just dosen't fly well unless it's loaded close to maximum pressure and velocity. The 1.5" group guarantee is usually only good with some very specific (and sometimes only one) load. My target AR shoots different sized groups depending on the specific ammo, and if I shorten the barrel on a given load I will change the velocity, thereby changing the accuracy.  In a rifle, barrel whip has some effect here which is why I suspect that an H-bar profile will get better accuracy. I'm just trying to find out.


Quoted:
Barrel length has NOTHING to do with accuracy. Ever wonder how high end 1911 builders can guarantee 1.5" groups at 50yds from a 5" barrel?

4/4/2005 4:07:21 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
You're partially correct here. Remember that a bullets are designed to stabilize out of a barrel at a specific velocity. A perfect example of this is the 230 FMJ bullet I'm required to use to shoot CMP 'leg' matches. Many shooters load a very light .45 wadcutter round for better controlability in bullseye, but the 230 FMJ just dosen't fly well unless it's loaded close to maximum pressure and velocity. The 1.5" group guarantee is usually only good with some very specific (and sometimes only one) load. My target AR shoots different sized groups depending on the specific ammo, and if I shorten the barrel on a given load I will change the velocity, thereby changing the accuracy.  In a rifle, barrel whip has some effect here which is why I suspect that an H-bar profile will get better accuracy. I'm just trying to find out.




That was just an example - Barrel length has NOTHING to do with accuracy, no matter what caliber.
4/4/2005 4:13:05 AM EDT
[#10]
The only way bbl length can affect accuracy is when you're using iron sights. A longer sight radius makes it easier to be more accurate.

Tests have also shown than shorter bbls tend to me more accurate because they are less likely to exhibit bbl whip.
4/4/2005 10:41:08 AM EDT
[#11]
I'm aware of one experiment where a revolver had it's barrel shortened 2" and recrowned between strings of shots. The result was that the 2" barrel shot as well as whatever the barrel length was to begin with. I think Guns and Ammo did the test. My question now is, has anyone done the same thing with a rifle? This would be fairly easy to do with a bolt gun, but a semi auto would pose problems. Because of the different factors in rifle accuracy, I would like to see some data before I make up my mind.
4/4/2005 10:48:08 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
I'm aware of one experiment where a revolver had it's barrel shortened 2" and recrowned between strings of shots. The result was that the 2" barrel shot as well as whatever the barrel length was to begin with. I think Guns and Ammo did the test. My question now is, has anyone done the same thing with a rifle? This would be fairly easy to do with a bolt gun, but a semi auto would pose problems. Because of the different factors in rifle accuracy, I would like to see some data before I make up my mind.

This same type of test was done with a bolt gun at Thunder Ranch, IIRC. The results were printed in some gun magazine but I don't recall which one it was. If I can find the mag at home, I will post the info from it assuming someone doesn't beat me to it.
4/4/2005 11:31:11 AM EDT
[#13]
That would be very cool. Thanks.
4/4/2005 2:01:54 PM EDT
[#14]

Barrel length has NOTHING to do with accuracy, no matter what caliber.

While I would agree that barrel length has no direct correlation to accuracy, there are several indirect effects, mostly at longer ranges.  For example:

  • Using a barrel shorter than what is required for an optimized powder burn, results in a greater muzzle velocity variation.  More velocity variation = less accuracy.

  • Shorter barrels = less average muzzle velocity.  Less muzzle velocity means the transonic velocity point happens at a lesser range.



Before we can arbitrarily wave off barrel length, we need to talk about the amount of accuracy degredation tolerated at a given range.  For the average Ar15 at 50yds, you just won't notice.
4/4/2005 2:08:43 PM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
Barrel length has NOTHING to do with accuracy. Ever wonder how high end 1911 builders can guarantee 1.5" groups at 50yds from a 5" barrel?



While I agree, it would still be amusing to see a bench rifle with a barrel as long as the scope.  Oh wait, that's called an XP100
4/6/2005 6:15:35 PM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I'm aware of one experiment where a revolver had it's barrel shortened 2" and recrowned between strings of shots. The result was that the 2" barrel shot as well as whatever the barrel length was to begin with. I think Guns and Ammo did the test. My question now is, has anyone done the same thing with a rifle? This would be fairly easy to do with a bolt gun, but a semi auto would pose problems. Because of the different factors in rifle accuracy, I would like to see some data before I make up my mind.

This same type of test was done with a bolt gun at Thunder Ranch, IIRC. The results were printed in some gun magazine but I don't recall which one it was. If I can find the mag at home, I will post the info from it assuming someone doesn't beat me to it.

I finally dug up the magazine that has this article. It's the January 2004 issue of Guns Magazine. I'll type up info from the article tomorrow.
4/7/2005 5:13:44 AM EDT
[#17]
Ok, here's the chart. The test was conducted at Thunder Ranch by Pete Nantirux. The rifle was a Robar SR60-2 300 Win Mag. They used a Lilja bbl and the bbl work (cutting and crowning) was done by Robbie Barrkman of Robar Inc. The rifle was topped off with a Leupold model 54680 Long Range M1 6.5x20.

4/7/2005 6:00:49 AM EDT
[#18]
The above chart basically shows what I expect.

However...

300 Win Mag is damn near a 1,000yd cartridge, and 300yds is the very close end of its effective range.  The effects of the shorter barrel are going to be seen at the far end of the effective range, and will move closer as the barrel is shortened.

If you want a good example of this, run the trajectory of your favorite cartridge on a ballistic calculation program.  Now change the velocity by 25fps and repeat.  You'll notice that the while the near range trajectory changes only slightly, the far range effects start to stack up.  What's missing from the above chart is how the muzzle velocity variation is growing.

Again, barrel length effect on accuracy depends on the definition of "accuracy" and the range at which one expects to wield it.
4/7/2005 6:05:16 AM EDT
[#19]
Thanks for digging up that chart. It proves what I was saying, that absolute accuracy is a composite of bullet, powder, brass, barrel length, etc, etc.  
AR Sponsor