Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Link Posted: 7/23/2004 12:11:23 PM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:
It's NATO spec. Is M855 different from NATO spec?




Yeap. Afraid so.
Link Posted: 7/23/2004 1:57:36 PM EDT
[#2]
OK, how is it different? The projectile is the same, so I'm guessing NATO spec is different in velocity.
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 1:58:36 PM EDT
[#3]
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 2:17:56 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
LMT was asked by the Govt to make their products around the M855. So they did and this is where the problem is (for the Civilian market).

C4



Grant,

For those of us lacking the brain power, could you please explain how the bolt is designed "around" the M855?  How is a bolt tuned or designed for a specific bullet and how does it know what type of bullet it's firing?  

If the ammo is loaded up to spec and it has enough power to properly cycle the BC what factor does the bullet's weight play?

I'm not trying to be a smart ass, I'm just genuinely interested on a scientific explanation on how this is done...
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 3:36:26 PM EDT
[#5]
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 3:46:03 PM EDT
[#6]
Nothing to do with pressure.  Pressure is constant, bolt thrust maybe????
HFG
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 3:59:38 PM EDT
[#7]
I think it is pressure.

SAMMI pressures are lower than NATO
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 4:49:09 PM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 4:53:56 PM EDT
[#9]
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 4:54:11 PM EDT
[#10]
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 4:57:04 PM EDT
[#11]
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 4:58:38 PM EDT
[#12]
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 5:57:26 PM EDT
[#13]
Link Posted: 7/26/2004 10:53:21 PM EDT
[#14]
One more bad LMT  thing to add to the list.  Lately I have been hearing many.
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 10:13:05 AM EDT
[#15]
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 10:29:21 AM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:
Precisely what I didn't want to hear back from LMT:


...PRELIMINARY TESTING WITH M855 AMMO HAS SHOWN NO FAIL TO FIRE OR EXTRACT...


It's good and bad in a way.  If the bolt and carrier combo work as advertised with M855 then someone who uses that exclusively will be getting a good deal on a nice bolt and carrier combo....

Hmph......



No comment...
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 10:31:24 AM EDT
[#17]
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 10:57:39 AM EDT
[#18]
Shivan, I know I mentioned it earlier, but I am using the enhanced bolt with the LMT standard carrier in my LMT M4 upper WITH 55gr Q3131A.  I was just at the range this past weekend and put another 300 rounds through it with absolute zero malfunctions of any sort.  I have about 600 rounds through it now total.  

What does this mean....., I have no idea......
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 11:02:30 AM EDT
[#19]
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 11:03:30 AM EDT
[#20]
Well, I was planning on buying an LMT M4 upper assembly.  Should I?  I have heard numerous problems with the "Enhanced Bolt."  Should I just stick with Bushmaster?

All these LMT problems makes me wonder about their quality and reliability.
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 11:07:21 AM EDT
[#21]
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 12:11:31 PM EDT
[#22]
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 12:14:31 PM EDT
[#23]
Link Posted: 8/2/2004 5:58:05 PM EDT
[#24]
I shot my LMT upper w/ enhanced bolt and carrier group for the first time the other day.

I only put about 100 rds thru it, but I was pretty impressed to have 0 malfunctions of any kind in a brand new upper.


THe one issue I do have is that it took 8 clicks to the left to zero the sights (using LMT BUIS). Most people I've heard from have said they have about the same amount of clicks using LMT BUIS.... and not all LMT uppers... I dunno if the BUIS has anything to do with that, or if the FSB is slightly canted.

Its not that big of a deal tho because the irons arent gonna be my primary sights, the Aimpoint I'm ordering soon will.



Link Posted: 8/2/2004 6:42:04 PM EDT
[#25]
Just been following along, seriously thinking about an LMT upper, was actually a day or so away from buying.   After quite a few problems with LMT that I've read about...this and the misaligned M4 ramps, I went with a good deal on a colt upper.   I really hope these issues get worked out, would still like to get one,  just can't figure out why a lot of companies let some of these things slip by.   Good luck, you've been very patient.
Link Posted: 8/3/2004 4:39:43 PM EDT
[#26]
Link Posted: 8/3/2004 4:43:21 PM EDT
[#27]
Link Posted: 8/3/2004 7:20:53 PM EDT
[#28]
Link Posted: 8/3/2004 7:30:16 PM EDT
[#29]
Colt Innards.
Link Posted: 8/13/2004 7:37:51 AM EDT
[#30]
Link Posted: 8/18/2004 4:38:59 PM EDT
[#31]
Link Posted: 8/18/2004 5:03:34 PM EDT
[#32]
Its your upper and money. I just want to see the results.
Link Posted: 8/18/2004 5:17:39 PM EDT
[#33]
I sure hope those problems are a thing of the past for you Ed.  Let us know how she does on Sunday.
Link Posted: 8/18/2004 6:59:42 PM EDT
[#34]
I'm just your basic Armchair Commando, so my opinion doen't count much to anyone but me. Having said that, I for one would be hard pressed to pay out good money for an "enhanced" product that was so ammunition sensitive that it only worked with one type of ammo. Also I cannot believe the military would find that an acceptable situation in a combat weapon.

In short, I'm not buying the "ammo excuse."

An "enhanced" part that will not function as reliably as a "stock" part is useless in my Armchair Command Humble Opinion.

I'll wait and see what the final verdict is though. However I'm betting on QC being the trouble.



Lonny
Link Posted: 8/21/2004 6:09:46 AM EDT
[#35]
i'm in the same boat with shivan, got my enhanced bolt back from chip.
got  400rds cycled through it so far. last time it fte  around 1.5krds.



meat
Link Posted: 8/23/2004 5:48:39 PM EDT
[#36]
Shivan, did you get to the range yesterday?  Any updates?
Link Posted: 8/23/2004 5:52:54 PM EDT
[#37]
Link Posted: 8/24/2004 9:17:20 AM EDT
[#38]
tag, to see range report
Link Posted: 8/31/2004 7:32:08 PM EDT
[#39]
Tag for range report and to say that my Colt and Bushmasters all run with no malfunctions, ever, with anything, except some crappy Malaysian and S&B ammo in the M4gery.  I would like an LMT upper and lower, but I'm not paying $100 more for an upper, $100 more for a lower, and $100 more for a complete "enhanced" bolt and carrier  that still may have bugs to be worked out.  Looks like LMT may be moving too fast to get product out there and hitting alot of bumps in the road.  They better slow down or they'll be in a ditch.  LMT will get it right, or get smoked by their competition, Colt, Bushmaster, and RRA.  Ain't America great!
Link Posted: 8/31/2004 7:57:28 PM EDT
[#40]
If I were you and it comes back still not 100% I'd give it to long-rifle-tactical to figure out.  BTW an H buffer used with the LMT carrier might be slowing its cyclic rate down too much.  I run a PRI fat boy gas tube on a 14.5" Bushy and if I use a LMT H buffer with it sometimes it will short cycle.  Q3131a and XM193 will run 100% but sometimes AE 223 won't and Natec doesn't work at all.

Personally I think the problems with your LMT are in the carrier and bolt.  While a neat design I think its far from 'proven' and needs more development.  I'd go with a RRA 'enhanced' bolt group with a Wolff extra power extractor spring and a McFarland 1pc gas ring and for good measure I'd install a new CAR gas tube and run an H buffer (which you are).

I would polish the chamber and make sure that the barrel extension is perfectly aligning with the reciever feed ramp, if not the receivers ramps could be in the way of the barrel extensions ramp and be causing the feeding problems.  Also make sure your mag catch is adjusted correctly, the threaded part of the catch should be flush with the button.
Link Posted: 9/1/2004 1:26:03 PM EDT
[#41]
Ed,

Gotm4 covered all the bases for correcting any issue that this upper has, if you do not find it in 100% working order when tested for serviceability.

Get a refund for it and I will build you an upper and I guarantee it to work with any standard .223 ammo.
Link Posted: 9/12/2004 3:09:04 PM EDT
[#42]
How'd did it function at the range?
Link Posted: 9/12/2004 3:24:44 PM EDT
[#43]
Page / 2
Next Page Arrow Left
Page AR-15 » AR Discussions
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top