As I understand it,(not an attourny at law nor clainm to be one) Full auto is classified as... when one pull of the trigger (one motion)equates in more than one round being fired, then the weapon is a full auto weapon. Be this as it may, and what little I know about judicail law, the courts would see this as an discretionary decision, either way a choice they will have to weigh. One, the weapon doesn't contain the legitimate parts or materials that encompass a full auto ar-15 (to be specific). Rather the rifle has been altered in such a manner that enables it to function, or allows it to operate in a full automatic fashion. Be this the decison that would have to be rendered, the trends of the court, in my nopinion, would select the weapon as an full auto/illegal classification. Meaning that although the weapon is not comprised of the parts tht would normally allow, under legal circumstances, the rifle to operate in an full auto fashion, the weapon has been altered in such a manner that allows such functions.
You'd probably sink fast in that tub, in other words. Course it is an interesting thought. But would it be safe?