Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login
Site Notices
Posted: 2/6/2002 7:16:38 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/6/2002 7:20:34 AM EDT by hielo]
got to [url]http://www.cnn.com[/url] and let them know that you are not willing to sacrifice freedom for percieved (and unobtaible) security. So far we are at: yes 60% no 40% The Sheeple are winning!
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 7:41:34 AM EDT
Done
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 7:44:41 AM EDT
Done. I can't believe people are willing to give up their rights for the sake of convenience. It makes me sick.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 7:45:05 AM EDT
Would you be willing to sacrifice privacy for speed at airport check-in? Yes 60% 39147 votes No 40% 25838 votes Total: 64,985 votes on a side note, if you choose to fly you choose to abide by the airlines rules. they can safeguard you by violating you if they want. it is a private industry.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 7:49:29 AM EDT
Done. However, the question was privacy vs. speed not freedom vs. security.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 7:53:50 AM EDT
Originally Posted By LARRYG: Done. However, the question was privacy vs. speed not freedom vs. security.
View Quote
Voted
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 7:59:55 AM EDT
Voted, believe it or not but there is no right to privacy, at least in the bill of rights. Maybe in your state there is a right to privacy but on a federal level there is no such thing.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 8:09:10 AM EDT
Done, still 60/40
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 8:13:10 AM EDT
Done, no change in ratio [IMG]http://www.theunholytrinity.org/cracks_smileys/contrib/aahmed/sad.gif[/IMG]
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 8:14:26 AM EDT
60(44007)/40(29174) Total: 73,181 votes Man there are sure a lot of stupid people out there.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 8:25:32 AM EDT
still 60/40
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 8:33:36 AM EDT
78,032 voted Still 60/40 The baaaah baaaah's are still winning!
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 8:34:40 AM EDT
79,039 votes and still no change. I fear the republic is lost.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 8:41:44 AM EDT
80,500 votes. Same stinkin' margin.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 8:46:59 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/6/2002 8:48:27 AM EDT by netrig]
81,920 still 60% 40% over 20,00 votes added since this thread and still 60 40 ? whats going on here hhhmmm
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 9:47:37 AM EDT
OK, guys, lets all have a cup of Tension Tamer tea and calm down. We're not voting on the Bill of Rights, just airport security. Someone would have to define what privacy (or its lack) means. The question as stated is too vague. Frankly, I still think the best solution is to require EVERY airline passenger to carry a KA-BAR and a 1911A1. Don't think there'd be any more incidents after that.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 10:24:45 AM EDT
Another brick in the wall.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 10:33:21 AM EDT
Done 60,946 - Yes 41,057 - No 60/40 to those who would give up privacy for security.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 10:43:30 AM EDT
Done.
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 10:48:03 AM EDT
[img]http://www.42.dropbear.id.au/image/nun01.jpg[/img]
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 11:20:27 AM EDT
Originally Posted By mejames: 79,039 votes and still no change. I fear the republic is lost.
View Quote
The 'shit' was taken years ago....the sheeple are just looking for 'us' to wipe with...
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 12:13:36 PM EDT
Aw, heck, a Florida member can always demand a recount. [;)]
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 2:23:59 PM EDT
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 3:00:24 PM EDT
Just went there myself, only saw the king poll... maybe they took it down to redo the numbers to make it look like the YES won.. hmm it is CNN you know..[;D]
Link Posted: 2/6/2002 3:03:15 PM EDT
I'm in the same boat as Aimless.. All I see is a thing about [b]"Who should be heir to the British throne?[/b] [:\]
Top Top