Posted: 5/1/2009 12:01:56 PM EDT
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsk6dJr4wps&feature=channel
Then http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Bdqy1_VAc&feature=channel Can't lose the key, forget the combo, or have to fumble with anything in the dark. Too bad I hate needles |
|
Quoted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsk6dJr4wps&feature=channel Then http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Bdqy1_VAc&feature=channel Can't lose the key, forget the combo, or have to fumble with anything in the dark. Too bad I hate needles you need to learn how to hotlink |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsk6dJr4wps&feature=channel Then http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Bdqy1_VAc&feature=channel Can't lose the key, forget the combo, or have to fumble with anything in the dark. Too bad I hate needles you need to learn how to hotlink thanks! |
|
Here's another problem...
conventional safe: owner has to actively key in some code or action to open safe. thief would have to interrogate owner for combo, coerce owner to open safe, or obtain code by surveillance unless they were capable of defeating the actual mechanism (unlikely for all but the most talented criminals) RFID: kill or render owner unconcious, drag him in front of safe, VOILA! or simply cut off body part with chip in it and use that |
|
Quoted:
Here's another problem... conventional safe: owner has to actively key in some code or action to open safe. thief would have to interrogate owner for combo, coerce owner to open safe, or obtain code by surveillance unless they were capable of defeating the actual mechanism (unlikely for all but the most talented criminals) RFID: kill or render owner unconcious, drag him in front of safe, VOILA! or simply cut off body part with chip in it and use that I say this in all the best of humor but you have seen one too many action/scifi movies 
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Here's another problem... conventional safe: owner has to actively key in some code or action to open safe. thief would have to interrogate owner for combo, coerce owner to open safe, or obtain code by surveillance unless they were capable of defeating the actual mechanism (unlikely for all but the most talented criminals) RFID: kill or render owner unconcious, drag him in front of safe, VOILA! or simply cut off body part with chip in it and use that I say this in all the best of humor but you have seen one too many action/scifi movies So if at gunpoint they make you wave your hand in front of the sensor your not going to do it?  |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Here's another problem... conventional safe: owner has to actively key in some code or action to open safe. thief would have to interrogate owner for combo, coerce owner to open safe, or obtain code by surveillance unless they were capable of defeating the actual mechanism (unlikely for all but the most talented criminals) RFID: kill or render owner unconcious, drag him in front of safe, VOILA! or simply cut off body part with chip in it and use that I say this in all the best of humor but you have seen one too many action/scifi movies
So if at gunpoint they make you wave your hand in front of the sensor your not going to do it?
If they make you open your combo safe at gunpoint are you going to do it? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Here's another problem... conventional safe: owner has to actively key in some code or action to open safe. thief would have to interrogate owner for combo, coerce owner to open safe, or obtain code by surveillance unless they were capable of defeating the actual mechanism (unlikely for all but the most talented criminals) RFID: kill or render owner unconcious, drag him in front of safe, VOILA! or simply cut off body part with chip in it and use that I say this in all the best of humor but you have seen one too many action/scifi movies
Got the idea from Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, actually...and reading a bunch of William Gibson and assorted other cyberpunk stuff. HOWEVER, my point still stands: If I were the robber and I knew the safe in question was activated by RFID, my course of action would be to incapacitate the owner and drag him over there instead of screwing around questioning him. Also, if I knew where the RFID chip was located in him (or had a scanning device) it would be a simple matter to hit said person over the head, tie his ass up in a closet somewhere, extract the chip, and WIN. Also, it'd be even better if that person had decided to get cute and have all their security based off the RFID chip; I could stroll in like it was my own house by virtue of having the freshly harvested chip in a tissue in my shirt pocket
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No thanks. RFID chips cause cancer in humans. Really? Care to cite a competent source? Use the power of The Google, sir. You can dismiss it if you'd like to. After all, it is your health. I don't need to Google- because there isn't any competent medical source to back-it up I have learned more about RFID in a week and you are likely to ever know. You made a rather wild claim - I'm asking for a competent medial source to back it up. Otherwise - lets say that it is a baseless claim. |
|
Quoted:
I had not seen the gun safe lock before. Now I am wondering why no one has implemented a lock on an pistol keyed to the owners RFID in their hand. There is already a law like that in CA... as soon as "smart gun" technology is viable, it becomes mandatory. As someone else said, fuck that noise  .
|