Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
12/2/2008 12:59:20 PM EDT
You see these guys in "unplugged" concerts and specials on HBO.  They're considered Rock Legends.  My question is, do they deserve this status or are they overrated?



I plan to do this for other musicians and groups as well.
12/2/2008 1:02:05 PM EDT
[#1]
Both are underrated.
12/2/2008 1:03:13 PM EDT
[#2]
Springsteen, WAY over rated.

Clapton, Rock-N-Roll GOD!
12/2/2008 1:03:25 PM EDT
[#3]
Springsteen is an overrated douchebag.

Clapton is ok, but overrated.

12/2/2008 1:03:33 PM EDT
[#4]
Both suck.  
12/2/2008 1:03:47 PM EDT
[#5]
I don't care for Springsteen except he has written some good songs.  I think Clapton is past his prime but at one time was a monster on the guitar.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l16jlallBMs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOWVg0AoHWE&feature=related
12/2/2008 1:04:27 PM EDT
[#6]
Both are bona fide legends.
12/2/2008 1:05:16 PM EDT
[#7]
Springsteen sounds like the collected ravings of a hospital stroke ward.
12/2/2008 1:07:18 PM EDT
[#8]
Clapton is by far the best ever with a guitar.  
/thread
12/2/2008 1:07:20 PM EDT
[#9]
I think Clapton is way overrated as a guitarist and underrated as a song writer.
Springsteen does nothing for me.
Both take their shit way too serious.
I voted both are overrated.
12/2/2008 1:07:31 PM EDT
[#10]
Both WAY overrated.
12/2/2008 1:07:42 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
Both are bona fide legends.


I'm with this guy.  Politics aside, they've staked a claim.
12/2/2008 1:07:55 PM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Clapton is by far the best ever with a guitar.  
/thread



Ha, that's a good one.
12/2/2008 1:08:55 PM EDT
[#13]
Old rock sucks with few exceptions.
12/2/2008 1:09:05 PM EDT
[#14]
I think they are both great.
12/2/2008 1:10:12 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Old rock sucks with few exceptions.


So does new rock.  C'est la vie.
12/2/2008 1:10:19 PM EDT
[#16]
Clapton is a legend, never been much of a Springsteen fan.
12/2/2008 1:11:07 PM EDT
[#17]
I like Clapton, he is great, but both are probably overrated...
12/2/2008 1:11:32 PM EDT
[#18]
Both are overrated.

Clapton is pretty good. I saw Clapton and Santana in concert together several years ago. Carlos smoked his ass when they played together. Clapton just finally stopped playing and started watching Carlos make the strings smoke.

Springsteen pretty much has written the same song about a bazillon times. I don't even listen to him anymore.
12/2/2008 1:12:02 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Old rock sucks with few exceptions.


So does new rock.  C'est la vie.

Hence the birth of metal.
12/2/2008 1:12:02 PM EDT
[#20]
Springsteen is a boring guitar player, and overrated.



Clapton is God, but as far as I'm concerned, he fell of the face of the earth when Cream disbanded. I refuse to acknowledge anything he did later. He died when Cream died. When they reunited in 2005 for a concert, he was raised from the dead and it was glorious. He then promptly died again.
12/2/2008 1:14:57 PM EDT
[#21]
Clapton's overrated.  Hit his peak in the mid to late sixties with Bluesbreakers and then the Cream.  He's been coasting ever since.

By contrast, nearly 40 years after his death, Jimi Hendrix is still almost universally regarded as the greatest electric guitarist that ever lived.  The chances of another in our lifetime don't seem too likely.  It is almost impossible to over-rate Hendrix.
12/2/2008 1:18:45 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
Clapton's overrated.  Hit his peak in the mid to late sixties with Bluesbreakers and then the Cream.  He's been coasting ever since.

By contrast, nearly 40 years after his death, Jimi Hendrix is still almost universally regarded as the greatest electric guitarist that ever lived.  The chances of another in our lifetime don't seem too likely.  It is almost impossible to over-rate Hendrix.


I will go out on a limb and say EVH is up there with Hendrix.

12/2/2008 1:24:04 PM EDT
[#23]
I'll go out on a limb and say that EVH was a cliched joke by 1990.  Tap... ugh.

ETA... Oh, and as I recall Eddie is a huge Clapton fan.
P.S. And when I saw Clapton in 2006, he pretty much sucked.  Though he still was demi-god when I saw in 1990.
12/2/2008 1:26:52 PM EDT
[#24]
wheres the option for total garbage?

12/2/2008 1:30:08 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
I'll go out on a limb and say that EVH was a cliched joke by 1990.  Tap... ugh.

ETA... Oh, and as I recall Eddie is a huge Clapton fan.
P.S. And when I saw Clapton in 2006, he pretty much sucked.  Though he still was demi-god when I saw in 1990.



Where is the 'Ignore Member' button?
12/2/2008 1:30:50 PM EDT
[#26]
Neither of them could even tune Dick Dale's guitar.
12/2/2008 1:33:08 PM EDT
[#27]
Just when you think you have heard the worst Springsteen song ever...you end up hearing another Springsteen song.



....god damn he is terrible...and that is before he even made his unholy alliance with the democrats.
12/2/2008 1:33:29 PM EDT
[#28]
Well one's known for being a guitarist and the other for his song writing.
Both are very good.
Seen Clapton once, but seen Springsteen about 7 times.
12/2/2008 1:35:34 PM EDT
[#29]
Quoted:
Neither of them could even tune Dick Dale's guitar.


I love Dick Dale
I like a few Clapton songs, I like a few Springsteen songs.

12/2/2008 1:36:33 PM EDT
[#30]
I've seen bruce, he was ok, but he is over rated.

Eric is ok too, and also over rated.

'over rated'= they're good at what they do, but they are far from excellence compared to others in the same field.
12/2/2008 2:04:22 PM EDT
[#31]
Quoted:
I'll go out on a limb and say that EVH was a cliched joke by 1990.  Tap... ugh.

ETA... Oh, and as I recall Eddie is a huge Clapton fan.
P.S. And when I saw Clapton in 2006, he pretty much sucked.  Though he still was demi-god when I saw in 1990.


I see your point that EVH sucks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdFJTbaFcZ0
12/2/2008 2:07:40 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
Springsteen sounds like the collected ravings of a hospital stroke ward.


grunting and teeth clenching.

I do like his stuff though.

Clapton is a master.

12/2/2008 2:09:23 PM EDT
[#33]
I think you have to die to really become a legend....James Dean, Hendrix.

Both these guys had a sweet spot in their careers where they were dynamic.  Clapton's stuff is probably going to outlast the Boss....jmho
12/2/2008 2:10:11 PM EDT
[#34]
Quoted:
Both suck.  





This.


12/2/2008 2:10:24 PM EDT
[#35]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Clapton's overrated.  Hit his peak in the mid to late sixties with Bluesbreakers and then the Cream.  He's been coasting ever since.

By contrast, nearly 40 years after his death, Jimi Hendrix is still almost universally regarded as the greatest electric guitarist that ever lived.  The chances of another in our lifetime don't seem too likely.  It is almost impossible to over-rate Hendrix.


I will go out on a limb and say EVH is up there with Hendrix.




EVH is the most influential guitarist since Jimi, but what's he done to compare to Electric Ladyland?  Woodstock?  Band of Gypsys at the Fillmore?  No, Jimi defined electric guitar for all time.
12/2/2008 2:12:41 PM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Clapton's overrated.  Hit his peak in the mid to late sixties with Bluesbreakers and then the Cream.  He's been coasting ever since.

By contrast, nearly 40 years after his death, Jimi Hendrix is still almost universally regarded as the greatest electric guitarist that ever lived.  The chances of another in our lifetime don't seem too likely.  It is almost impossible to over-rate Hendrix.


I will go out on a limb and say EVH is up there with Hendrix.




EVH is the most influential guitarist since Jimi, but what's he done to compare to Electric Ladyland?  Woodstock?  Band of Gypsys at the Fillmore?  No, Jimi defined electric guitar for all time.


Both have influenced countless guitarists since their 'heyday'

Jimi is awesome, but I think EVH shocked the guitar world out of the Styx, REO Speedwagon, etc mindset too (thank god)
12/2/2008 2:15:12 PM EDT
[#37]
Since the passing of Frank Sinatra, there are no more legends of song.
12/2/2008 2:19:26 PM EDT
[#38]
A lot of you guys probably never heard this, but EVHs porno movie music when he hit rock bottom a few years ago.

I think he was a meth head when this vid was made. He does play drums, guitar and keyboards though.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpACZS0vSO4
12/2/2008 2:28:48 PM EDT
[#39]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Old rock sucks with few exceptions.


So does new rock.  C'est la vie.

Hence the birth of metal.


+1. Rock was a good idea until they let pussies like Clapton and Springsteen label their vagina noise as rock.
12/2/2008 2:29:10 PM EDT
[#40]
I liked Springsteen's early music and think he was an authentic voice of a working-man experience and growing up in a certain culture.  I knew that culture –– Route 9, Raceway Park, Stone Pony, all that –– and his lyrics meant something to me.  And the E Street Band kicked it.  Back in '76 I saw them play for 2 hours, take a break, then come out for another 2 to the point where the house lights got turned up on them.  At the end they were playing 1950s rock and roll and just having fun.  The guy was just IMMENSE on stage.

But he pissed me off when he screwed around on his wife, and I can't stand to watch Scialfa on stage with him.  I didn't feel a common bond anymore.

I think they're both legit rock legends, yes, if there's such a thing.
12/2/2008 4:03:44 PM EDT
[#41]
Quoted:
Springsteen, WAY over rated.

Clapton, Rock-N-Roll GOD!


This.
12/2/2008 4:10:37 PM EDT
[#42]
Springshit is so fucking awful I would rather listen to a looping tape of Hillary's cackling laugh than to that POS.
12/2/2008 4:12:40 PM EDT
[#43]
I'll take Warren Zevon over either one of them
12/2/2008 4:19:44 PM EDT
[#44]
Both overrated
12/2/2008 4:20:42 PM EDT
[#45]
Quoted:
Springsteen, WAY over rated.

Clapton, Rock-N-Roll GOD!



This.





5sub

12/2/2008 4:21:58 PM EDT
[#46]
Both are legends. You have to see Springsteen live to get the full experience.


12/2/2008 4:22:14 PM EDT
[#47]
Clapton is very talented, but a bit overrated through his career––-that is, he did some great stuff early, but the later stuff is not so good.
Springsteen has always been a no-talent hack and I don't understand what anyone sees in his music.  He had one good album his whole career.
12/2/2008 4:22:40 PM EDT
[#48]
Quoted:
Old rock sucks with few exceptions.



Isn't it past your bedtime?
12/2/2008 4:30:52 PM EDT
[#49]
I've seen Clapton in concert several times and Springsteen in concert something like 9 times.

In the early 70's, Springsteen was raw and emotional.  Put on a fantastic show (sometimes as much as 4 hours).  Then he got famous and what happened to him happens to most Rock Stars....they start singing their social outlook and politics.  Then the music starts to suffer.

He still puts on a decent show (saw him 2 years ago) and has some good songs,  But nothing like when he started.

Clapton was the same.  Awesome guitar and decent song writer.  He still puts on a good show, but he's older & more mellow. ( saw him several years ago in a small venue in Houston)

Overrated.......maybe!  Talented......definitely.  Do I like their music,,,,,Yes.  But that's my opinion and my taste...and that's what music is all about.
12/2/2008 4:45:12 PM EDT
[#50]
Clapton is God.
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page