Posted: 9/5/2008 6:35:36 AM EDT
|
Ok, there is no point in saying this is a unbiased paper - but it is free and has good restaurant and movie reviews, sometimes a good laugh in News from the Weird, and some local news of interest that the daily does not touch. That said, I find myself reluctant to attempt to read it anytime near an election - but I did last night before watching the convention. Basically said in a sensible society Palin should be convicted of child abuse by not forcing her daughter to get an abortion. I just hope these "pro-choice" people keep talking. Every time they open their mouth and spew hate it helps our candidates. Anyway, here is a link to the article. |
|
Hmmm... child abuse for NOT "forcing" a 17 year old daughter to kill her unborn baby? It's more appropriate to "force" an abortion and have the girl go through mental anguish, depression, second-guessing into her 40's and of course blaming her parents for the ordeal since she would have had no choice in the matter? Sooooo much for personal responsibility, much less contradictory viewpoints! |
|
I love Austin, but man, sometimes the massive amounts of libtards here makes me sad. Here's what the 'tard said:
My retort to this fucktard would be: How do you KNOW Palin's daughter didn't know about/was not educated on/ did not use contraception? Do you know that contraception is NOT 100% effective? The only 100% method of preventing pregnancy is the one thing you WILL NOT SUPPORT - abstinence, but you would never teach that to your children, because it doesn't let them make their own choices. In the face of the absence of factual knowledge about Bristol Palin's use or disregard for contraception, you cannot condemn her as ignorant, nor can you condemn her parents or the community she was raised in. You simply don't know the circumstances of the conception of her child. |
|
We need a fire mission on that POS author. This is a good place to start. Here's the webpage with the email contact for everyone of importance that works there (scroll down after page opens). Link |
Where is the "choice" in "pro-choice"? And we're not all like that here. The only thing the Chronicle is good for is finding which bands are playing where. Other than that it makes great charcoal starter for the chimney or perhaps birdcage liner. |
Hey now. Just make sure you aim at the hippy part of Austin (i.e. Central Austin) and don't hit us conservatives out in the burbs. The only difference between the chronicle and the statesman is the chronicle is free. Otherwise, both papers are fish wraps. |
