Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
8/5/2008 6:30:09 PM EDT
LCS-1 did "sea trials" on the Great Lakes last week. Here's a link to a video of her high speed run. I'm told that she will go faster in salt water because the water is more dense and her propulsion system will be more efficient.

www.lmlcsteam.com/video/LCSSeaTrialsHighSpeed-small.wmv
8/6/2008 9:00:53 AM EDT
[#1]
Bump, what the hell?
8/6/2008 9:02:00 AM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:
Bump, what the hell?


Nobody cares about your silly boats.
eta Seriously, speed of test? And how many boarders could you pull with that thing?
8/6/2008 9:08:21 AM EDT
[#3]
That seems like a lot of ship for just one tiny gun.


Of course, I'll admit, I know nothing about ships.
8/6/2008 1:26:56 PM EDT
[#4]
I'm bumping this just because.
8/6/2008 1:30:07 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
That seems like a lot of ship for just one tiny gun.


Of course, I'll admit, I know nothing about ships.


guns are no longer as important as they once were.  And the gun on it is plenty capable for it's intended use.

Hey dport,  can y'alls RHI's keep up with the ship
8/6/2008 1:33:35 PM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

eta Seriously, speed of test? And how many boarders could you pull with that thing?

I've only heard unofficial numbers for speed. I hesitate to repeat them.

As for boarders? Enough.
8/6/2008 1:34:45 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
That seems like a lot of ship for just one tiny gun.


Of course, I'll admit, I know nothing about ships.

That one tiny gun has a range of 17km and can fire 220 rounds per minute.

As freerider points out, it is one hell of a gun for its intended purpose.
8/6/2008 1:35:18 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:
That seems like a lot of ship for just one tiny gun.


Of course, I'll admit, I know nothing about ships.


guns are no longer as important as they once were.  And the gun on it is plenty capable for it's intended use.

Hey dport,  can y'alls RHI's keep up with the ship

Depends on the RHIB.
8/6/2008 1:42:55 PM EDT
[#9]
For the speed, I'm not sure whether it's classified or not.  Probably is.

Wikipedia says 45 knots on the sidebar to the right.  I assume that figure at least is public domain but I think it's a design number, not actual test speed.


As noted, ships will go faster in salt water versus fresh by a very noticable margin.  It's not a matter of engine efficiency but of density and buoyancy.  Salt water is more dense and thus a ship rides higher in the ocean than it will on the Lakes.  Since there's less "wetted area" on the hull, there's less drag.
8/6/2008 1:50:12 PM EDT
[#10]
dport, what rank will the COs of these ships have?
8/6/2008 1:50:32 PM EDT
[#11]
Whats with the basketball court on the back?
8/6/2008 1:53:27 PM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted: That seems like a lot of ship for just one tiny gun. Of course, I'll admit, I know nothing about ships.

That one tiny gun has a range of 17km and can fire 220 rounds per minute. As freerider points out, it is one hell of a gun for its intended purpose.
Where are they going to stow the missile modules on that thing? Or are they going to have some seaman recruit drag them out to the flight deck prior to firing?
8/6/2008 2:45:09 PM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
dport, what rank will the COs of these ships have?


Skipper? First mates will be gilligans.
8/6/2008 2:54:17 PM EDT
[#14]
8/6/2008 2:57:00 PM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
Where are they going to stow the missile modules on that thing? Or are they going to have some seaman recruit drag them out to the flight deck prior to firing?


According to Wiki, one "Rolling Airframe Missile" rack above the hangar for defense, and the gun can be pulled and replaced with a second missile array depending on the mission.  But that's just for defense, the LCS isn't designed to be a destroyer or cruiser.  Its way too small, its more like a WW2 corvette or an overgrown PT boat.

Should be a decent way to deploy/extract SF operators and their toys in a big hurry when "over the horizon" assets like Ospreys and helicopters aren't an option.  
8/6/2008 3:01:30 PM EDT
[#16]
Group Buy!!!! Arrrgggg!!!!
8/6/2008 3:11:33 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted: That seems like a lot of ship for just one tiny gun. Of course, I'll admit, I know nothing about ships.

That one tiny gun has a range of 17km and can fire 220 rounds per minute. As freerider points out, it is one hell of a gun for its intended purpose.
Where are they going to stow the missile modules on that thing? Or are they going to have some seaman recruit drag them out to the flight deck prior to firing?


From what I gather from globalsecurity.com, modules can be placed above the hanger in front of the RAM, including modules with VLS tubes for anti-ship missiles, etc.  
8/6/2008 6:11:58 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
dport, what rank will the COs of these ships have?

Commander (O-5)
8/6/2008 6:14:10 PM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted: That seems like a lot of ship for just one tiny gun. Of course, I'll admit, I know nothing about ships.

That one tiny gun has a range of 17km and can fire 220 rounds per minute. As freerider points out, it is one hell of a gun for its intended purpose.
Where are they going to stow the missile modules on that thing? Or are they going to have some seaman recruit drag them out to the flight deck prior to firing?


From what I gather from globalsecurity.com, modules can be placed above the hanger in front of the RAM, including modules with VLS tubes for anti-ship missiles, etc.  

Pretty much. Remember the missiles are not conventional Navy missiles with a conventional Navy VLS. It will use NLOS-LS, aka Netfires.