Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
20912 Online
bravocompany bravocompany bravocompany
brownells brownells
tnvc tnvc tnvc
AR15.COM
bravocompany
My Account
bravocompany bravocompany bravocompany
brownells brownells
tnvc tnvc tnvc
vortex
Holosun
GS
aim
silencerShop
springfield
magpul
brownells
geissele
DFC
colt
bravocompany
RS
primaryArms
JRH
Guns
skd
palmetto
fightlite
midwest
cz
OSIGHT
20912 Online
geissele
bravocompany
GS
brownells
primaryArms
Guns
aim
magpul
springfield
DFC
midwest
silencerShop
JRH
palmetto
colt
RS
Holosun
fightlite
skd
vortex
OSIGHT
cz
Sponsor News Introducing TNVC's NEW and Exclusive Filmed SuperGain (FSG) U.S. Gen 3 White Phosphor
Site News Could You Have Stopped This? Vegas Shooting Analysis with Attorneys on Retainer
6/24/2008 6:47:50 PM EDT
www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/so_lets_say_jus.html
6/24/2008 6:49:35 PM EDT
[#1]
man i hope he does
6/24/2008 6:51:48 PM EDT
[#2]
Or maybe they'll wait again.

They aren't bound to release an opinion in this session are they? Can't they wait as long as they want to release an opinion?

I know in some cases lower courts have waited years to release an opinion.
6/24/2008 7:01:01 PM EDT
[#3]

[T]here is no need to deceive ourselves as to what the original Second Amendment said and meant. Of course, properly understood, it is no limitation upon arms control by the states.


I won't lie.  That quote from Scalia's book made me throw up a little in my mouth. . .
6/24/2008 9:41:46 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
Or maybe they'll wait again.

They aren't bound to release an opinion in this session are they? Can't they wait as long as they want to release an opinion?

I know in some cases lower courts have waited years to release an opinion.


I think they have until the first day of the new term.
6/24/2008 9:44:11 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:

[T]here is no need to deceive ourselves as to what the original Second Amendment said and meant. Of course, properly understood, it is no limitation upon arms control by the states.


I won't lie.  That quote from Scalia's book made me throw up a little in my mouth. . .


Well, absent incorporation under the 14th amendment, he's absolutely correct.
6/24/2008 9:53:22 PM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:

[T]here is no need to deceive ourselves as to what the original Second Amendment said and meant. Of course, properly understood, it is no limitation upon arms control by the states.


I won't lie.  That quote from Scalia's book made me throw up a little in my mouth. . .


Well, absent incorporation under the 14th amendment, he's absolutely correct.


And Scalia hasn't been an enemy of incorporation, if my understanding is correct.  

If the 2nd gets incorporated, that would be an incredible ruling.
6/24/2008 9:56:53 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
If the 2nd gets incorporated, that would be an incredible ruling.


That can't happen in this case, as there is no state question...

Incorporation is a question for John Doe vs City of Chicago... Or whatever it will be called when they do it....
6/24/2008 10:26:46 PM EDT
[#8]
He's probably the best friend we'll ever have on the SCOTUS.
6/24/2008 10:32:58 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:

Quoted:
If the 2nd gets incorporated, that would be an incredible ruling.


That can't happen in this case, as there is no state question...

Incorporation is a question for John Doe vs City of Chicago... Or whatever it will be called when they do it....


That was the reason Gura MADE this case, To avoid the whole incorperation mess.

Wouldn't surprise me if "Mr. Gun Guy Vs. City of Chicago" is already drafted just waiting for the finishing touches on someones desk , waiting on the ruling...

Honestly it Would not surprise me if " Mr Eye Wanna Funswitch vs. ATF " is not half drafted either.
6/24/2008 10:34:57 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:

Quoted:
If the 2nd gets incorporated, that would be an incredible ruling.


That can't happen in this case, as there is no state question...

Incorporation is a question for John Doe vs City of Chicago... Or whatever it will be called when they do it....


Dicta.
6/24/2008 10:44:47 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:
If the 2nd gets incorporated, that would be an incredible ruling.


That can't happen in this case, as there is no state question...

Incorporation is a question for John Doe vs City of Chicago... Or whatever it will be called when they do it....

Which probably will happen, since the 2nd more than adequately meets the 3 conditions for incorporation.
6/25/2008 6:00:09 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
If the 2nd gets incorporated, that would be an incredible ruling.


That can't happen in this case, as there is no state question...

Incorporation is a question for John Doe vs City of Chicago... Or whatever it will be called when they do it....


Dicta.


Ditka?
Pro2A
blackhills
brownells
SAS
LAPG
RS
ar15com
fightlite
cmmg
THBRD
gray
Faxxon
LAPG
springfield
silencerShop
primaryArms
ar15com
palmetto
ar15com
colt
bravocompany
CA