Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
5/12/2008 7:40:14 PM EDT
I'm learning my long overdue proper usage of map & compass and have an issue with the length of "pacing".

I see sources state:
Pacing uses a natural stride for traveling that is equal to TWO steps
Start with your right foot and count every time your left foot hits the ground as 1 pace.


Other definitions of pace state:
a single step in walking (or ONE step.)


I'm a bit confused - which is correct?
5/12/2008 7:43:26 PM EDT
[#1]
i was taught to use your natural walking pace for cross-country traveling. count it how you will, but you just need to know how many steps are in a certain distance.

if i count every step, my 50m pace count is 56. if i count every other step, my pace is 28.
5/12/2008 7:59:35 PM EDT
[#2]
Ah, that makes a bit more sense -
So as long as I stick to one or the other, using that number would yield a proper calculation.

I guess it would only be an issue if someone else told me "go 120 paces to XXXX"
and they didn't use the same system I am using. right?
5/12/2008 7:59:36 PM EDT
[#3]
Seen both definitions used. Just be careful to state which one you used.
5/12/2008 8:22:58 PM EDT
[#4]
The Romans counted paces, a pace being two steps or every time the left foot touches the ground or right foot if you prefer.  A thousand paces is about a Roman mile, a thousand steps is about half a Roman mile.  Mile (me-lay) is a thousand in Latin, from the thousand pace thing.  

A Roman mile is smaller than our mile, Romans were shorter and had shorter legs than us.  Anyway the Latin teacher told us the Romans stopped for a short break every mile when they weren't in a hurry.  On the other hand they might be in Italy and walk over to France or Spain.  Those were some tough little guys.