Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/24/2008 2:52:01 AM EDT
Personally, when it comes to deciding which firearms I like, appearance is usually the first issue. That's one reason I'd rather own an AK than an AR. People commonly criticize me for it, but thats how I am. I'm not LEO or .mil, so in most cases, I'll be looking at my gun, taking it to the range and showing it to other people or keeping it in a case, so having something that's unique and fits my preference (shape, style, color, sound, finish, etc) is important. Conventional styles aren't my thing, so I'll probably be looking into doing expensive custom work on just about one I'll own.

Does anyone else here identify with this also, or would you throw those who want not just a gun, but a work of art, into the mental category?
2/24/2008 5:21:49 AM EDT
[#1]
Form follows function.

Anything else is teh ghey.
2/24/2008 5:27:21 AM EDT
[#2]
Both.  Some guns are owned just from a collector's stand point, others are looked at as tools.
2/24/2008 5:29:24 AM EDT
[#3]
I choose my guns in this order, always:

1. Caliber
2. Reliability
3. Ergonomics/Adaptability
4. Aesthetics

Every. Time. No different than if I were choosing a cordless drill. Looks are part of it but a very small part.

Some of the best guns I've ever owned are by some people's standards fucking ugly. Some even looked ugly to me, but after handling or shooting them they looked better. As a matter of fact, I used to hate the looks of AR's and had to own one before my mind flopped and I appreciated the looks BECAUSE of the function.
2/24/2008 5:33:12 AM EDT
[#4]
I would say that ergonomics trumps aesthetics for me: selector switch, bolt handle, magazine release, magazine catch, etc.
2/24/2008 5:35:45 AM EDT
[#5]
While I would agree with the "form follows function" statement, I think there are some firearms where attention to appearance was a consideration in manufacture.

Take the Colt 1860 Army revolver for example.  I still think it's the epitome of the gunmaker's art.

I'm sure there're more modern examples, but I just got up and haven't had NEAR enough coffee to get the brain going yet.
2/24/2008 5:36:41 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:
Form follows function.

Anything else is teh ghey.

I always wonder why so many people equate "flashiness" to being "gay", but as long as people don't go out of their way to attack people's preferences, then to each his own.
2/24/2008 5:38:36 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
While I would agree with the "form follows function" statement, I think there are some firearms where attention to appearance was a consideration in manufacture.

Take the Colt 1860 Army revolver for example.  I still think it's the epitome of the gunmaker's art.

I'm sure there're more modern examples, but I just got up and haven't had NEAR enough coffee to get the brain going yet.

Exactly. Gun-smithing just doesn't seem quite like the art it once was. Everything is so much more utilitarian and bare these days. Things like beautiful engravings and unique touches added by the smith have been replaced by carbon copying and tacticool accessories.
2/24/2008 5:39:55 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Form follows function.

Anything else is teh ghey.

I always wonder why so many people equate "flashiness" to being "gay", but as long as people don't go out of their way to attack people's preferences, then to each his own.


I agree.  I wonder how many people called Patton gay to his face for having an ivory handled revolver?
2/24/2008 5:47:06 AM EDT
[#9]
OK, I'm on my third cup...

Colt manufactured the Python .357 revolver in several variants.

Personally, I think the Colt bluing was the prettiest.  Stainless is OK.  The matte-black Trooper was one of the ugliest things I've ever seen.
2/24/2008 5:48:23 AM EDT
[#10]
First and foremost, I want my guns to work and put bullets where I point them.  If they look good while doing it, that's just icing on the cake.
2/24/2008 6:08:24 AM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Personally, I think the Colt bluing was the prettiest.  .


+1....Nothing like a nice deep dark blued 6"python.....

OK ...wait........that sounded a bit ghey
2/24/2008 7:12:18 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Personally, I think the Colt bluing was the prettiest.  


+1....Nothing like a nice deep dark blued 6"python.....

OK ...wait........that sounded a bit ghey


LOL  Has anyone ever come up with a better looking blue?

And while we're on the subject: What's up with that funky "charcoal blue" some of the Italian single-actions are done in?
2/24/2008 7:15:49 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
I choose my guns in this order, always:

1. Caliber
2. Reliability
3. Ergonomics/Adaptability
4. Aesthetics

Every. Time. No different than if I were choosing a cordless drill. Looks are part of it but a very small part.

Some of the best guns I've ever owned are by some people's standards fucking ugly. Some even looked ugly to me, but after handling or shooting them they looked better. As a matter of fact, I used to hate the looks of AR's and had to own one before my mind flopped and I appreciated the looks BECAUSE of the function.



I would put them like this...

1. Reliability
2. Ergonomics/Adaptability
3. Caliber
4. Aesthetics

Does it shoot?
Can I shoot it well?
Is it going to kill what I hit?
Do I like it?

Always remember, you are buying a power tool...not a piece of art to hang on the wall.
Unless its specifically a curio, go for function.
2/24/2008 7:19:41 AM EDT
[#14]
  Function #1  coolness 2nd. Fortunately I like most guns looks. Sometimes they are so ugly they just look cool,like the carbines in Planet of the Apes, or the US "grease gun" !!!