Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
11/5/2007 2:42:46 AM EDT
Ok the myth...water stops a bullet and if you are being shot at diving underwater will save you.

The first shot a 9mm into a tank, straight down into ballistics gel, 12" thick.  No penetration after 6 feet, (maybe 8 feet).

Then they tried a shotgun, slug...pressure blew the tank apart...LMAO... but did go through the gel at 6 feet.

so they set up a rig, in a pool and set the target (the 12" thick gel) at a 23degree angle.  

Black powder .45, 1000FPS made it 5 feet to the gel.

AR15, .223, round turned to dust 12 inches after it hit the water.

M1 Grand, .308 round turned to dust after 14 inches.

.50 cal........round turned to dust after 25 inches.

Excuse me...don't they shoot into a tank of water at an angle to identify rifling marks when comparing rounds to those used in crimes?

they say the myth is true, faster rounds explode / turn to dust / break apart inches after hitting the water...even the big .50.  but shooting slower rounds, like the 9mm directly down into the water "may" penetrate up to 6'.
11/5/2007 2:54:13 AM EDT
[#1]
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.
11/5/2007 2:55:24 AM EDT
[#2]
Not sure, but mythbusters is entertainment, not science.
11/5/2007 2:56:30 AM EDT
[#3]
Diving into a pool or lake might save you (depending on whether you can equalize your ears...I can't ) but within a minute or two you are going to need to come up for air....so what's the rush on the shooter's part? How many can't afford to just wait?

Now I agree if it's a question of being shot NOW for sure or having the chance to get away by diving in a lake/river/ocean and then reversing course underwater and swiming under the bad guy's boat or going low and slow for 100' or more before coming up briefly and doing it again....I'd pick the latter.

But just jumping into the deep end of a pool to 'get away' is pretty stupid. IMO.

11/5/2007 2:58:22 AM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


+1
11/5/2007 2:58:25 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


did you see the one where they had her wear a skin tight leotard so they could take a picture of her butt....

man she is hot.

back to the question...dont crime labs shoot into water so they have a round to compare for ballistic tests?
11/5/2007 3:01:48 AM EDT
[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


did you see the one where they had her wear a skin tight leotard so they could take a picture of her butt....

man she is hot.

back to the question...dont crime labs shoot into water so they have a round to compare for ballistic tests?
With handguns they do because most of the time, handgun rounds stay intact.  There is no way in hell you could should a .223 into a water tank at close range without it blowing up.
11/5/2007 3:02:58 AM EDT
[#7]
I've seen that episode. Maybe I'm missing something but how could it be wrong when they showed it happening? Granted they would have to try different make/model ammo in each caliber etc to be completely scientific about it all but the fact remains that the camera didn't lie. I'm not up to speed on bullet comparison methodology, perhaps high velocity rounds are fired into a different medium. Or maybe they just can't do comparison tests on HV rounds...
11/5/2007 3:03:45 AM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


did you see the one where they had her wear a skin tight leotard so they could take a picture of her butt....

man she is hot.

back to the question...dont crime labs shoot into water so they have a round to compare for ballistic tests?
With handguns they do because most of the time, handgun rounds stay intact.  There is no way in hell you could should a .223 into a water tank at close range without it blowing up.


Ok so how do they get a match for a long arm bullet?  If the shoot into gel it will break up too....or will it?
11/5/2007 3:06:38 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
I've seen that episode. Maybe I'm missing something but how could it be wrong when they showed it happening? Granted they would have to try different make/model ammo in each caliber etc to be completely scientific about it all but the fact remains that the camera didn't lie. I'm not up to speed on bullet comparison methodology, perhaps high velocity rounds are fired into a different medium. Or maybe they just can't do comparison tests on HV rounds...


Well first off, I have shot at things under water at over 3 feet and hit bottom.

secondly, They must shoot into something at the crime labs, you can't say a gun fired a bullet without matching it up.  either the case has to match or the rifling.
11/5/2007 3:06:43 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:maybe they just can't do comparison tests on HV rounds...
That would be my guess
11/5/2007 3:06:50 AM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


did you see the one where they had her wear a skin tight leotard so they could take a picture of her butt....

man she is hot.

back to the question...dont crime labs shoot into water so they have a round to compare for ballistic tests?
With handguns they do because most of the time, handgun rounds stay intact.  There is no way in hell you could should a .223 into a water tank at close range without it blowing up.


Ok so how do they get a match for a long arm bullet?  If the shoot into gel it will break up too....or will it?


Just a guess, maybe they down load the pressure to keep them below the frag velocity?
11/5/2007 3:07:59 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I've seen that episode. Maybe I'm missing something but how could it be wrong when they showed it happening? Granted they would have to try different make/model ammo in each caliber etc to be completely scientific about it all but the fact remains that the camera didn't lie. I'm not up to speed on bullet comparison methodology, perhaps high velocity rounds are fired into a different medium. Or maybe they just can't do comparison tests on HV rounds...


Well first off, I have shot at things under water at over 3 feet and hit bottom.

secondly, They must shoot into something at the crime labs, you can't say a gun fired a bullet without matching it up.  either the case has to match or the rifling.
Have you shot a .223 Rem. into water and found an intact bullet?
11/5/2007 3:09:16 AM EDT
[#13]
You mean Kari?

<BOTD images removed. -NorCal_LEO>  

11/5/2007 3:09:58 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


did you see the one where they had her wear a skin tight leotard so they could take a picture of her butt....

man she is hot.

back to the question...dont crime labs shoot into water so they have a round to compare for ballistic tests?


The design of the rifle bullets is the problem. They are shooting military ball out of the rifles, the design of the bullets is so that they yaw and break apart after a shorter distance in the water. The center of gravity on a spitzer type bullet is more towards the rear of the bullet. When it hits something soft, like water or tissue, it tends to yaw and break apart at the weakest part which is the crimping groove. The 9mm pistol bullet and the shot gun slug have more mass located forward and are resistant to yawing thus they penetrate more. Load a round nose big game bullet and the results will be different for the rifles.
11/5/2007 3:10:53 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


She's hot!!
11/5/2007 3:49:40 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
You mean Kari?

www.tvsquad.com/media/2006/05/mythbuster-kari.jpg

content.ytmnd.com/content/8/b/e/8bec21a7ca34e3832322a3f40f6ea7da.jpg



Thanks Freehand!

I just saved those pics before the MOD's steal them for their own use!
11/5/2007 3:56:41 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:

Quoted:
You mean Kari?

www.tvsquad.com/media/2006/05/mythbuster-kari.jpg

content.ytmnd.com/content/8/b/e/8bec21a7ca34e3832322a3f40f6ea7da.jpg



Thanks Freehand!

I just saved those pics before the MOD's steal them for their own use!


Google can be your friend!

Why don't you click this link? : Kari Byron
11/5/2007 4:34:19 AM EDT
[#19]
Where's the "oh jeez, not this shit again" guy?

Its an old episode, its been beaten to death here repeatedly.
11/5/2007 4:49:02 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
Where's the "oh jeez, not this shit again" guy?

Its an old episode, its been beaten to death here repeatedly.


But everytime it is brought up....


WE GET TO TALK ABOUT KARI!!!

11/5/2007 4:52:58 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I've seen that episode. Maybe I'm missing something but how could it be wrong when they showed it happening? Granted they would have to try different make/model ammo in each caliber etc to be completely scientific about it all but the fact remains that the camera didn't lie. I'm not up to speed on bullet comparison methodology, perhaps high velocity rounds are fired into a different medium. Or maybe they just can't do comparison tests on HV rounds...


Well first off, I have shot at things under water at over 3 feet and hit bottom.

secondly, They must shoot into something at the crime labs, you can't say a gun fired a bullet without matching it up.  either the case has to match or the rifling.


stop watching so much TV. CSI is NOT real...


11/5/2007 4:59:52 AM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


+1


You need to check out her FHM spread she did, I am still picking up my jaw after seeing her in those pics.
11/5/2007 5:02:09 AM EDT
[#23]
I too watch it for the hot redhead chick. Id hit it.



More pics of the hot redhead!!!
11/5/2007 5:13:50 AM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:
I too watch it for the hot redhead chick. Id hit it.



More pics of the hot redhead!!!


Check these:

http://www.fhmonline.com/articles-1276.asp

11/5/2007 5:19:04 AM EDT
[#25]
yep.  

Id hit it

11/5/2007 5:23:09 AM EDT
[#26]
kari is hot

scottie was also until grant replaced her (well I guess she still is hot, just not on the show)

I don't understand how you think they "got it wrong" on this particular issue.  I have seen shows where I thought their results were skewed though.
11/5/2007 5:27:43 AM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:
You mean Kari?

www.tvsquad.com/media/2006/05/mythbuster-kari.jpg

content.ytmnd.com/content/8/b/e/8bec21a7ca34e3832322a3f40f6ea7da.jpg



Is that the episode where they tried to show that some women REALLY do like to be spanked?
11/5/2007 5:46:31 AM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:
yep.  

Id hit it




...Like a 2x4, fired from an air-cannon!
11/5/2007 11:38:24 AM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:
For what purpose did they need a picture of her butt?


Why ask why?  Just be happy that they did and the video and photo are on the interweb for our enjoyment.
11/5/2007 11:44:13 AM EDT
[#30]
Video of the segment?  Hmm...where's the link!
11/5/2007 11:50:16 AM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
Video of the segment?  Hmm...where's the link!


POW!

Nice pooper Kari!
11/5/2007 11:51:43 AM EDT
[#32]



.......Well first off, I have shot at things under water at over 3 feet and hit bottom.....


Silly you..... every time I put ANYTHING made of lead into water, it ALWAYS hits bottom. Even if the bottom is a mile from the surface!




Quoted:
............I would hate having to deal with ugly nerds all day long.....


So why are you hanging out on ar15.com???!!!!
11/5/2007 11:53:58 AM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Video of the segment?  Hmm...where's the link!


POW!

Nice pooper Kari!


Very nice, somehow I missed that episode.  
11/5/2007 11:55:04 AM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Excuse me...don't they shoot into a tank of water at an angle to identify rifling marks when comparing rounds to those used in crimes?



First off the rounds didnt turn into 'dust' but did break apart. Second IIRC they use this device that looks like a snail shell internally. Its like curved metal in a loop that goes into water. This slows it down and I guess allows it not to break up. I saw them when the NRA convention was in a town a few years  ago.

Finally - yeah - didnt you watch the show? The shit broke up in water. Pretty cut and dry. The slower moving rounds faired better.



www.snailtraps.com/

No water, just spins round and round until it loses enough momentum to fall out the bottom.
11/5/2007 12:07:59 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Excuse me...don't they shoot into a tank of water at an angle to identify rifling marks when comparing rounds to those used in crimes?



First off the rounds didnt turn into 'dust' but did break apart. Second IIRC they use this device that looks like a snail shell internally. Its like curved metal in a loop that goes into water. This slows it down and I guess allows it not to break up. I saw them when the NRA convention was in a town a few years  ago.

Finally - yeah - didnt you watch the show? The shit broke up in water. Pretty cut and dry. The slower moving rounds faired better.



www.snailtraps.com/

No water, just spins round and round until it loses enough momentum to fall out the bottom.


And scuff the hell out of the bullet, making comparison difficult.

Back when I worked for a department that did this, they had what amounted to a "Box O' Truth" filled with oiled sawdust.  I have no idea why it was oiled, but it was.
11/5/2007 12:30:39 PM EDT
[#36]

Quoted:
Everyone knows that .223 bullets fired from an AR are unstable and tumble on their way to the target. That's what makes them so deadly. Almost as deadly as the AK-47 - it can shoot a 7.62 bullet, which is the same as a .308.



Really?  




11/5/2007 12:46:04 PM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Everyone knows that .223 bullets fired from an AR are unstable and tumble on their way to the target. That's what makes them so deadly. Almost as deadly as the AK-47 - it can shoot a 7.62 bullet, which is the same as a .308.



Really?  






I read it in the ammo forum, so it must be true.
11/5/2007 12:51:17 PM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:
I never pay attention to what they say. I just watch the show in order to check out the redhead chick.


Yep. Nice chicky snak.
11/5/2007 12:59:45 PM EDT
[#39]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
I've seen that episode. Maybe I'm missing something but how could it be wrong when they showed it happening? Granted they would have to try different make/model ammo in each caliber etc to be completely scientific about it all but the fact remains that the camera didn't lie. I'm not up to speed on bullet comparison methodology, perhaps high velocity rounds are fired into a different medium. Or maybe they just can't do comparison tests on HV rounds...


Well first off, I have shot at things under water at over 3 feet and hit bottom.

secondly, They must shoot into something at the crime labs, you can't say a gun fired a bullet without matching it up.  either the case has to match or the rifling.


stop watching so much TV. CSI is NOT real...






How in the hell do you think they recover bullets when testing them in crime labs? I've seen it done in real life on investigative shows.
11/5/2007 1:47:38 PM EDT
[#40]
lets get back on topic guys. So is Kari straight? When she first started the show I got a lesbian vibe.  
11/5/2007 2:28:35 PM EDT
[#41]

Quoted:
lets get back on topic guys. So is Kari straight? When she first started the show I got a lesbian vibe.  


Lesbian vibe no... maybe she's "experimented" yes.
11/5/2007 9:20:12 PM EDT
[#42]
I can't stand the fat dork show host that always acts like a child.  I want to smash his face. I think those two guys are closeted homos.
11/5/2007 9:24:54 PM EDT
[#43]
The rounds actually "turn to dust"????


HORSESHIT
11/5/2007 9:25:17 PM EDT
[#44]

Quoted:
lets get back on topic guys. So is Kari straight? When she first started the show I got a lesbian vibe.  


Not lesbian. Artist yes. And got married last year.
11/5/2007 9:34:23 PM EDT
[#45]

Quoted:

Quoted:
lets get back on topic guys. So is Kari straight? When she first started the show I got a lesbian vibe.  


Lesbian vibe no... maybe she's "experimented" yes.


I thought it would be impossible for the MPI to go any higher, in this thread.

I was wrong...

11/5/2007 9:46:25 PM EDT
[#46]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
I've seen that episode. Maybe I'm missing something but how could it be wrong when they showed it happening? Granted they would have to try different make/model ammo in each caliber etc to be completely scientific about it all but the fact remains that the camera didn't lie. I'm not up to speed on bullet comparison methodology, perhaps high velocity rounds are fired into a different medium. Or maybe they just can't do comparison tests on HV rounds...


Well first off, I have shot at things under water at over 3 feet and hit bottom.

secondly, They must shoot into something at the crime labs, you can't say a gun fired a bullet without matching it up.  either the case has to match or the rifling.


stop watching so much TV. CSI is NOT real...






How in the hell do you think they recover bullets when testing them in crime labs? I've seen it done in real life on investigative shows.


Do you see them firing a high powered rifle into that tank at point blank range in those tanks, or just pistols?  I can't see a crime lab tech firing a M1 Garand at a small tank of water from less than 2 feet.....
11/5/2007 9:48:52 PM EDT
[#47]

Quoted:
The rounds actually "turn to dust"????


HORSESHIT


They didn't turn to dust, but they did break up into small pieces.  

What's horseshit about it?  They fired the rifles into a pool, in front of a camera, they recovered tiny fragments of bullets.  It's the results they achieved.  Do you think they faked it?

Now, they fired their weapons at an angle at pretty much point blank range into the pool, which isn't realisitic.  Their methods of firing skewed the results of a typical real-life scenario....
11/5/2007 11:35:19 PM EDT
[#48]

Quoted:
Everyone knows that .223 bullets fired from an AR are unstable and tumble on their way to the target. That's what makes them so deadly. Almost as deadly as the AK-47 - it can shoot a 7.62 bullet, which is the same as a .308.

Machowicz, is that you?
11/5/2007 11:39:50 PM EDT
[#49]

Quoted:
It must suck to be hot yet not rich enough to avoid conventions.  I would hate having to deal with ugly nerds all day long.

www.genconhistory.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=7032&g2_serialNumber=1


Wow, I can smell the BO from here.
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page