Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
10/4/2007 3:40:56 PM EDT
Is it better to be a big fish in a little pond or a little fish in a big pond when it comes to life in general

Example:
Big fish little pond:
-Young Realator in a town of ~30,000 with only 4 or 5 other firms in your town besides the one you work for.

Little Fish in a big pond:
-Young Realator in NYC with massive competition, massive living expenses but chance to make lots of money on large deals.

Explain your reasoning...
10/4/2007 3:52:14 PM EDT
[#1]
I think it depends on your personality and what type of situation you deal better with.  There are pro's and con's to each.
10/4/2007 3:53:20 PM EDT
[#2]
Little of both.

It's fun to be the big fish, but if you want to go to the top, you have to at some time or another jump into a bigger pond and become a smaller fish. Then grow bigger, and become the big fish in that pond.

Repeat until you're the biggest!
10/4/2007 3:57:27 PM EDT
[#3]
I find that most of the time, the "Big Fish" have delusions of grandeur....

Better to be a little fish in a big pond, get big and fat via fleecing the shit out of the lake, and then retire to your own puddle in style.  
10/4/2007 4:00:18 PM EDT
[#4]
big fish little pond fits me and my pace better than the alternative


I have had opportunities to transfer to bigger jobs/greater pay in the company i work for but they always involve moving to a large metro area and larger facilities with more headache

not worth the stress and change of environment to me
10/4/2007 4:02:17 PM EDT
[#5]
It's good to be the king. No matter how small your kingdom.
10/4/2007 4:02:59 PM EDT
[#6]
even as the Big Fish, you might be smaller than some of the Little Fish in the bigger pond...  more opportunity/competition means you'll make plenty if you're good enough.  less competition means you'll make it if the others aren't as driven/talented/personable.  
10/4/2007 4:16:24 PM EDT
[#7]
Where's the I want the pond all to myself?