Posted: 9/17/2007 6:25:17 AM EDT
www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070917121119.nj85q9zm&show_article=1
|
|
Wow....they sound very concerned to me. Couple that with the fact that they're now threatening Israel with 600 missiles in just a 1st attack, and our troop with missiles in Iraq, and you get the impression that they're desperatel in staving off an attack: ============================================= 600 Iranian missiles said to be pointed at targets in Israel By JPOST.COM STAFF Six hundred Iranian Shihab-3 missiles are pointed at targets throughout Israel, and will be launched if either Iran or Syria are attacked, an Iranian website affiliated with the regime reported on Monday. "Iran will shoot at Israel 600 missiles if it is attacked," the Iranian news website, Assar Iran, reported. "600 missiles will only be the first reaction." According to the report, dozens of locations throughout Iraq, which are being used by the US Army, have also been targeted. The Shihab missile has a range of 1,300 km, and can reach anywhere in Israel. On Sunday, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said that the nuclear Iranian crisis forces the world "to prepare for the worst," and said that in this case it "is war." Kouchner emphasized, however, that negotiations should still be the preferred course of action. Kouchner, quoted by French daily Le Figaro, added that "Iran does whatever it pleases in Iraq ... one cannot find in the entire world a crisis greater than this one." In response to Kouchner's comments, Iran's state-owned news agency accused France of pandering to the interests of the United States. "The new occupants of the Elysee (Presidential palace) want to copy the White House," the IRNA news agency said in an editorial. The editorial added that French President Nicolas Sarkozy was taking on "an American skin." Kouchner's statements came just hours after US Defense Secretary Robert Gates reiterated the Bush administration's commitment, at least for the time being, to using diplomatic and economic means to counter the potential nuclear threat from Iran. |
Of course they would....but it's painfully obvious to anyone with even half a brain that they want nuclear weapons and they apparently are willing to risk attacks for them. HH |
Right... The fact that they're not building any reactors to USE that nuclear fuel in, is very telling... |
Ha Ha Ha Ha. Baghdad Bob speaking for Iran. |
Whoda thunk it? He reads Chesty Puller. |
exact thing i thought when i read that .. he needs to be bitch slaped for that alone. |
Israel already has nuclear weapons aimed at Iran. What's the big deal here? |
Iran and Syria signed a mutual defense pact. Multiple sources say the US worked with Israel to coordinate the strikes on Syrian nuclear stocks. The world may not realize it, none of the players might be admitting it, but the destruction of our enemy's nuclear facilities has already begun. This kind of shot across the bow, whether answered or not, is only the first. It will continue, one at a time or many at once, until one side says uncle. I see similarities to a bar fight here. A noisy drunk drew a line in the sand, and warned a quiet guy with...those kinda eyes...not to cross it. The line was crossed. The noisy drunk, fully aware that the line was crossed, is repeating his threats if the line is crossed. He hasn't adjusted to the new reality yet. That doesn't mean he's too afraid to fight. |