Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
9/2/2007 8:03:13 PM EDT
Ok,
  I've read multiple internet commando stories of fellas getting arrested for not providing identification/driver's licenses when requested by law enforcement... and being in the legal right for not doing so.

  And I'm down with that... but what about .MIL?   i'm pretty sure millitary personel must identify themselves as such when confronted by the police...

 What you say?
9/2/2007 8:06:11 PM EDT
[#1]
If you are .mil you can ask them for their ID and then whisk them off to Gitmo where they will never be heard from again. I know this is true because one of the Circuit City receipt rebels* told me.



*motto: death before PIN codes
9/2/2007 8:07:41 PM EDT
[#2]
I understand needing to provide ID when driving.

I don't anyplace else unless you are already under arrest. Not providing ID shouldn't be an arrestable offense..
9/2/2007 8:07:53 PM EDT
[#3]
Why shouldn't they? If a policeman asks someone (in civilian garb) for ID, they are obliged LEGALLY to provide it.

So if an out-of-state .mil person shows his home state ID AND his military ID*, he's home free.


*IIRC he/she is required to carry military ID as long as he/she is actively serving.
9/2/2007 8:12:32 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
Why shouldn't they? If a policeman asks someone (in civilian garb) for ID, they are obliged LEGALLY to provide it.


How ya figure?
Matt
9/2/2007 8:17:33 PM EDT
[#5]
Military peronnel are not required to show their military ID to civ. LEOs, or identify themselves as military.  You are required to keep their ID on you at all times when on active duty.  They are, however, required to identify themselves, and surrender their military ID at the request of MPs/MAs.  Your military ID does not belong to the member anyway, it is property of the US government.  Says so right on the back.
9/2/2007 8:21:00 PM EDT
[#6]
Quoted:
Why shouldn't they? If a policeman asks someone (in civilian garb) for ID, they are obliged LEGALLY to provide it.
quote]

Varies by state.
9/2/2007 8:21:50 PM EDT
[#7]
You have to comply with LE lawful orders, that has been upheld in court. If they ask for id or your name, you have to provide it. They will take you to jail until they figure out who you are.

Just show the fucking id, I mean damn.
9/2/2007 8:28:34 PM EDT
[#8]
Why don't you find the applicable state statute/code that applies to the situation you're envisioning rather than wade through the BS you're going to get here in GD?
9/3/2007 1:43:52 AM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
Military peronnel are not required to show their military ID to civ. LEOs, or identify themselves as military.  You are required to keep their ID on you at all times when on active duty.  They are, however, required to identify themselves, and surrender their military ID at the request of MPs/MAs.  Your military ID does not belong to the member anyway, it is property of the US government.  Says so right on the back.


FWIW; Drivers license in most states is the property of the state.
9/3/2007 5:04:41 AM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
Why don't you find the applicable state statute/code that applies to the situation you're envisioning rather than wade through the BS you're going to get here in GD?


I've searched and haven't found it...  

for civilians I think this applies:


U.S. Supreme Court
KOLENDER v. LAWSON, 461 U.S. 352 (1983)
461 U.S. 352
KOLENDER, CHIEF OF POLICE OF SAN DIEGO, ET AL. v. LAWSON
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 81-1320.

Argued November 8, 1982
Decided May 2, 1983




But I recal being told somewhere along the lines, and upon request for ID from a LEO a millitary personel is required to identify themselves as such...  but I can't find it anywhere.

9/3/2007 5:16:30 AM EDT
[#11]
There is no law here that not providing ID is an arrestable offense.
9/3/2007 5:19:22 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:
I understand needing to provide ID when driving.

I don't anyplace else unless you are already under arrest. Not providing ID shouldn't be an arrestable offense..


IIRC there's something about this in FL law... just a sec.


ETA: I can't find anything right now but I thought there was a thread about this not long ago.
9/3/2007 5:22:13 AM EDT
[#13]
Just start acting like you're an illegal. They will leave you alone. Government enforcement agents only harass the serfs.
9/3/2007 5:28:28 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
But I recal being told somewhere along the lines, and upon request for ID from a LEO a millitary personel is required to identify themselves as such...  but I can't find it anywhere.


tag.

this is new to me.
9/3/2007 5:41:43 AM EDT
[#15]
Varies by state.

In Texas, it used to be called "Failure to Identify".

Don't know current law.

Why cause yourself a lot of trouble?  Just show them your DL and be on your way.


9/3/2007 5:47:43 AM EDT
[#16]
From Wiki

Stop and Identify statutes. link


FL's law


856.021  Loitering or prowling; penalty.--

(1)  It is unlawful for any person to loiter or prowl in a place, at a time or in a manner not usual for law-abiding individuals, under circumstances that warrant a justifiable and reasonable alarm or immediate concern for the safety of persons or property in the vicinity.

(2)  Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether such alarm or immediate concern is warranted is the fact that the person takes flight upon appearance of a law enforcement officer, refuses to identify himself or herself, or manifestly endeavors to conceal himself or herself or any object. Unless flight by the person or other circumstance makes it impracticable, a law enforcement officer shall, prior to any arrest for an offense under this section, afford the person an opportunity to dispel any alarm or immediate concern which would otherwise be warranted by requesting the person to identify himself or herself and explain his or her presence and conduct. No person shall be convicted of an offense under this section if the law enforcement officer did not comply with this procedure or if it appears at trial that the explanation given by the person is true and, if believed by the officer at the time, would have dispelled the alarm or immediate concern.
9/3/2007 5:50:04 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
Varies by state.

In Texas, it used to be called "Failure to Identify".

Don't know current law.

Why cause yourself a lot of trouble?  Just show them your DL and be on your way.




I don't always carry a DL on me if I am not driving.

What happens then?
9/3/2007 5:51:59 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Varies by state.

In Texas, it used to be called "Failure to Identify".

Don't know current law.

Why cause yourself a lot of trouble?  Just show them your DL and be on your way.




I don't always carry a DL on me if I am not driving.

What happens then?


Then behave yourself and don't get in trouble.  

All kidding aside, in Texas, the officer can detain you until he is able to identify you, if you are a suspect in a crime.
9/3/2007 5:56:38 AM EDT
[#19]
What if you dont have it with you?

I'm out alot without my wallet.

So, am I breaking the law if I leave my home without ID?
9/3/2007 6:03:49 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
What if you dont have it with you?

I'm out alot without my wallet.

So, am I breaking the law if I leave my home without ID?


No, you are not breaking any law by not having your wallet with you.

But, if, for instance, the police received a call that there was a guy peeking in people's windows at night and they were patrolling the neighborhood looking for the guy, and came upon you, they would ask for ID.

If you say, "I don't have any", they will detain you until they can ascertain who you are.

I know, because I did exactly that, once.
9/3/2007 6:08:27 AM EDT
[#21]
I would guess failing to identify yourself is not quite the same as refusing to provide an ID card.  That said... here where I live I typically *have* to provide ID upon demand.  I carry a pistol, AT ALL TIMES, and the law states I MUST surrender my License to Carry Handgun to law enforcement upon demand.  No two ways about it.  
9/3/2007 6:11:29 AM EDT
[#22]
and there are those who say we don't live in a police state
9/3/2007 6:27:19 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:
and there are those who say we don't live in a police state



Those who say that are usually the ones forcing the police state on you, or blindly stupid.

9/3/2007 6:30:04 AM EDT
[#24]
I know many cops that say "No ID...come with me"
9/3/2007 6:33:30 AM EDT
[#25]
There might be a military charge for failure to provide ID to a civilian authority.  Thats what shore patrol would charge sailors with who refused to provide ID to police when asked.

Here is the VA Beach City code addressing the issue.

Sec. 23-7.1. Providing identification to police officer.
It shall be unlawful and a Class 1 misdemeanor for any person at a public place or place open to the public to refuse to identify himself by name and address at the request of a uniformed police officer or of a properly identified police officer not in uniform, or to provide false information in response to such a request, if the surrounding circumstances are such as to indicate to a reasonable man that the public safety requires such identification.


What this means, is the officer has to have a reason to ask, such as investigating a crime.  I just can't walk up and demand you identify yourself without a good reason.

9/3/2007 7:01:48 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:
There might be a military charge for failure to provide ID to a civilian authority.  Thats what shore patrol would charge sailors with who refused to provide ID to police when asked.

Here is the VA Beach City code addressing the issue.

Sec. 23-7.1. Providing identification to police officer.
It shall be unlawful and a Class 1 misdemeanor for any person at a public place or place open to the public to refuse to identify himself by name and address at the request of a uniformed police officer or of a properly identified police officer not in uniform, or to provide false information in response to such a request, if the surrounding circumstances are such as to indicate to a reasonable man that the public safety requires such identification.


What this means, is the officer has to have a reason to ask, such as investigating a crime.  I just can't walk up and demand you identify yourself without a good reason.



I've got to admit, if a cop asks for an ID, I give them my military ID - they normally leave me alone after that.  
Matt
9/3/2007 7:04:47 AM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:
You have to comply with LE lawful orders, that has been upheld in court. If they ask for id or your name, you have to provide it. They will take you to jail until they figure out who you are.

Just show the fucking id, I mean damn.


Yeah, just let 'em search your car too on a whim, I mean, damn. You've got nothing to hide, right?

JUST FUCKING CONFORM AND SUBMIT ALREADY DAMN IT!
9/3/2007 8:32:41 AM EDT
[#28]
§ 38.02. FAILURE TO IDENTIFY.  (a) A person commits an
offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence
address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully
arrested the person and requested the information.
(b)  A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a
false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a
peace officer who has:
(1)  lawfully arrested the person;                                            
(2)  lawfully detained the person;  or                                        
(3)  requested the information from a person that the
peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal
offense.
(c)  Except as provided by Subsections (d) and (e), an
offense under this section is:
(1)  a Class C misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (a);  or
(2)  a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (b).
(d)  If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this
section that the defendant was a fugitive from justice at the time
of the offense, the offense is:
(1)  a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (a);  or
(2)  a Class A misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (b).
(e)  If conduct that constitutes an offense under this
section also constitutes an offense under Section 106.07, Alcoholic
Beverage Code, the actor may be prosecuted only under Section
106.07.
9/3/2007 8:35:16 AM EDT
[#29]
Texas Law:


TX Penal Code: Sec. 38.02. Failure to Identify.
 
(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.
 
(b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has:
 
(1) lawfully arrested the person;
 
(2) lawfully detained the person; or
 
(3) requested the information from a person that the peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal offense.
 
(c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
 
(d) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant was a fugitive from justice at the time of the offense, the offense is a Class B misdemeanor.
 
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 869, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987. Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 821, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1991; Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994



Simlified version: Not operating a motor vehicle or under arrest =  No requirement for ID.
9/3/2007 8:39:03 AM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:
§ 38.02. FAILURE TO IDENTIFY.  (a) A person commits an
offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence
address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully
arrested the person and requested the information.
(b)  A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a
false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a
peace officer who has:
(1)  lawfully arrested the person;                                            
(2)  lawfully detained the person;  or                                        
(3)  requested the information from a person that the
peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal
offense.
(c)  Except as provided by Subsections (d) and (e), an
offense under this section is:
(1)  a Class C misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (a);  or
(2)  a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (b).
(d)  If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this
section that the defendant was a fugitive from justice at the time
of the offense, the offense is:
(1)  a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (a);  or
(2)  a Class A misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (b).
(e)  If conduct that constitutes an offense under this
section also constitutes an offense under Section 106.07, Alcoholic
Beverage Code, the actor may be prosecuted only under Section
106.07.


I was gonna post that.  IN Texas, you have to show a license if engaged in a licensed activity such as driving, hunting/fishing, carrying a concealed handgun under a license, etc.

What LawDog quoted is Texas ID laws.  It means that a person does not have to SHOW any type of ID (unless of course engaged in a licensed activity.) A person arrested must give his name, address and DOB.

A person detained, or who the cop believes is a witness cannot give a FAKE name, address or DOB.  He can REFUSE to ID himself unless arrested.

9/3/2007 8:40:57 AM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:


Simlified version: Not operating a motor vehicle or under arrest =  No requirement for ID.


Just to be sure no one misses this;

if you are carryin a concealed handgun under authority of your CHL, and a Peace Officer demands that you ID yourself, you must display BOTH your CHL and State issued ID.  It is not an arrestable offense, but can result in a suspended CHL.  
9/3/2007 8:46:41 AM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:

Quoted:


Simlified version: Not operating a motor vehicle or under arrest =  No requirement for ID.


Just to be sure no one misses this;

if you are carryin a concealed handgun under authority of your CHL, and a Peace Officer demands that you ID yourself, you must display BOTH your CHL and State issued ID.  It is not an arrestable offense, but can result in a suspended CHL.  


I was going to include that but didn't want to further complicate the issue at hand.
9/3/2007 9:06:45 AM EDT
[#33]
States with Stop and ID laws

By each state is the statute allowing it.

States not listed don't have these laws.
9/3/2007 9:08:22 AM EDT
[#34]

Quoted:

Quoted:
§ 38.02. FAILURE TO IDENTIFY.  (a) A person commits an
offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence
address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully
arrested the person and requested the information.
(b)  A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a
false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a
peace officer who has:
(1)  lawfully arrested the person;                                            
(2)  lawfully detained the person;  or                                        
(3)  requested the information from a person that the
peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal
offense.
(c)  Except as provided by Subsections (d) and (e), an
offense under this section is:
(1)  a Class C misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (a);  or
(2)  a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (b).
(d)  If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this
section that the defendant was a fugitive from justice at the time
of the offense, the offense is:
(1)  a Class B misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (a);  or
(2)  a Class A misdemeanor if the offense is committed
under Subsection (b).
(e)  If conduct that constitutes an offense under this
section also constitutes an offense under Section 106.07, Alcoholic
Beverage Code, the actor may be prosecuted only under Section
106.07.


I was gonna post that.  IN Texas, you have to show a license if engaged in a licensed activity such as driving, hunting/fishing, carrying a concealed handgun under a license, etc.

What LawDog quoted is Texas ID laws.  It means that a person does not have to SHOW any type of ID (unless of course engaged in a licensed activity.) A person arrested must give his name, address and DOB.

A person detained, or who the cop believes is a witness cannot give a FAKE name, address or DOB.  He can REFUSE to ID himself unless arrested.



IIRC being issued a CCW means you must ALWAYS present the CCW license even when not CCWing.
9/3/2007 9:13:34 AM EDT
[#35]
Brown v. TX:
- A person cannot be required to identify himself; even when the stop is lawful.  

You're setting yourself up for sec. 1983... civil suits.  If you have been arrested, well, that's another matter.  
9/3/2007 9:25:48 AM EDT
[#36]
Failure to Identify is not the same thing as failure to show an I.D.   If you give the officer your name, address, and D.O.B. then you have identified yourself and have complied with the law. You are not required to possess any government I.D. papers if you are not driving a motor vehicle, hunting, fishing, or carrying a CW.
9/3/2007 9:44:11 AM EDT
[#37]
While I dont think that anyone should have to carry and provide "papers" in order to move about in society, there are cases of legal priviliges that require such identification. Driving requires that you posess a license in most, if not all states. If you are driving without a licesnse, you can be arrested. Why do you have to have a permit to do something? Because they say so.

In Florida, Im required to posess a Concealed Weapons Licesnse to carry guns, knives, 2X4s with rusty nails sticking out, Samarai swords, etc. If I dont produce an ID to an Officer, he will probably find "reasonable suspicion" by my actions at his discretion, within the confines of the law. I will probably be subject to at least a pat down, where even a moron would surely find multiple weapons. He will then ask me to provide a CCW. By state law, Im required to produce it when requested by an Officer. At this point, even if I show him my CCW the Officer will probably be annoyed and may even arrest me just for fuck of it. Even if I walk on the charges of "just pissing a cop off" it will still cost me a grand in lawyer fees to have my lawyer explain to the prosecuter that "pissing cops off" is not really against the law. I will probably have all charges dropped, but Im still out a grand.
You see, there is a lot more to LE and the legal system than most people stop to consider. Cops know that even if they charge you with something that isnt illegal, you will still pay through the nose, even when the charges get dropped.

While Im happy to see people challenge the courts and stand up for their rights, I realize that coutrooms are just a check out aisle for the government. The judges are the managers and the cops are the customer service reps that patrol the streets looking for potential customers to drag into their employers store. Its just like any other business except they dont have to be nice to their customers. And once you enter their store, you have to buy their services before you can leave, even if you dont use them.
9/3/2007 10:02:16 AM EDT
[#38]
Eh, hell, I just give the cop what he wants. It speeds things up so I can go on my way, it makes the cop feel better, it makes me feel better, I'm not really giving up any rights, I'm just being pleasant and demonstrating that I am a decent citizen supporting my local LEOs.

For me, my thought is "Why be an ass about it"?

So, practice this: "Sure Officer, here it is" and then hand it to him.

ETA: Watch Chris Rock "How to not get your ass kicked by the police".
9/3/2007 11:17:08 AM EDT
[#39]

Quoted:

Quoted:
and there are those who say we don't live in a police state



Those who say that are usually the ones forcing the police state on you, or blindly stupid.



Wow, that didn't take long

If an LEO has reason to ask you for ID then there's no logical reason not to provide it. That is, unless you have some weed up your ass about having "the evil government" knowing who you are.

9/3/2007 11:25:07 AM EDT
[#40]

Quoted:
Quoted:
...snip...quote]

Yeah, just let 'em search your car too on a whim, I mean, damn. You've got nothing to hide, right?

JUST FUCKING CONFORM AND SUBMIT ALREADY DAMN IT!


Very constructive.
9/3/2007 11:31:58 AM EDT
[#41]

Quoted:
Eh, hell, I just give the cop what he wants. It speeds things up so I can go on my way, it makes the cop feel better, it makes me feel better, I'm not really giving up any rights, I'm just being pleasant and demonstrating that I am a decent citizen supporting my local LEOs.

For me, my thought is "Why be an ass about it"?

So, practice this: "Sure Officer, here it is" and then hand it to him.

ETA: Watch Chris Rock "How to not get your ass kicked by the police".


Because being cooperative with any government agency or individual that even resembles a source of authority makes you a submissive, conformist sheep.

They have to fight the power that is this horrible, oppressive police state that we live in that requires such unreasonable actions like identifying yourself during the course of a law enforcement investigation.
9/3/2007 11:34:09 AM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:
States with Stop and ID laws

By each state is the statute allowing it.

States not listed don't have these laws.


I read that and then proceeded to look up the statute referenced for GA and my only advice is, don't take everything as gospel just cos it's on the net

§ 16-11-36.  Loitering or prowling


  (a) A person commits the offense of loitering or prowling when he is in a place at a time or in a manner not usual for law-abiding individuals under circumstances that warrant a justifiable and reasonable alarm or immediate concern for the safety of persons or property in the vicinity.

(b) Among the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether alarm is warranted is the fact that the person takes flight upon the appearance of a law enforcement officer, refuses to identify himself, or manifestly endeavors to conceal himself or any object. Unless flight by the person or other circumstances make it impracticable, a law enforcement officer shall, prior to any arrest for an offense under this Code section, afford the person an opportunity to dispel any alarm or immediate concern which would otherwise be warranted by requesting the person to identify himself and explain his presence and conduct. No person shall be convicted of an offense under this Code section if the law enforcement officer failed to comply with the foregoing procedure or if it appears at trial that the explanation given by the person was true and would have dispelled the alarm or immediate concern.

(c) A person committing the offense of loitering or prowling shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

(d) This Code section shall not be deemed or construed to affect or limit the powers of counties or municipal corporations to adopt ordinances or resolutions prohibiting loitering or prowling within their respective limits.



This statute covers loitering and prowling and has nothing to do with a circumstance like the one the OP has described.
9/3/2007 11:37:17 AM EDT
[#43]
Name, address, and DOB is all I am required to give in Ohio, unless I am driving.

Ohio stop and detain law
9/3/2007 11:45:58 AM EDT
[#44]

Quoted:
Failure to Identify is not the same thing as failure to show an I.D.   If you give the officer your name, address, and D.O.B. then you have identified yourself and have complied with the law. You are not required to possess any government I.D. papers if you are not driving a motor vehicle, hunting, fishing, or carrying a CW.


Even more, in Texas unless you are arrested or engaging in a licensed activity you do not even have to tell the officer your name.  
9/3/2007 11:49:43 AM EDT
[#45]

Quoted:
. At this point, even if I show him my CCW the Officer will probably be annoyed and may even arrest me just for fuck of it.
 That is an interesting Florida Statute.  Can you quote it or provide a link?  

Even if I walk on the charges of "just pissing a cop off" it will still cost me a grand in lawyer fees to have my lawyer explain to the prosecuter that "pissing cops off" is not really against the law. I will probably have all charges dropped, but Im still out a grand.
You see, there is a lot more to LE and the legal system than most people stop to consider. Cops know that even if they charge you with something that isnt illegal, you will still pay through the nose, even when the charges get dropped.
 A LEO who knowingly arrests a person who the peace officer KNOWS has not committed a crime can be charged with a criminal Federal Civil Rights violation.  And in Texas, he can further be charged with Official Opression.


While Im happy to see people challenge the courts and stand up for their rights, I realize that coutrooms are just a check out aisle for the government. The judges are the managers and the cops are the customer service reps that patrol the streets looking for potential customers to drag into their employers store. Its just like any other business except they dont have to be nice to their customers. And once you enter their store, you have to buy their services before you can leave, even if you dont use them.


That is just so off I am not going to comment further.  
9/3/2007 12:19:00 PM EDT
[#46]
Well, it was meant as complete sarcastic embellishment. But you have to admit it certainly is a possible scenario, given officer discretion.

My description of courtrooms is also unrealistic of most....well... some. Unless we are referring to Harris County, of course.
9/3/2007 12:23:57 PM EDT
[#47]
In my state we only cite and release people who have evidence of their identity. So if you wont provide ID the you have to be booked for whatever violation it is the police have stopped you for.
9/3/2007 12:27:50 PM EDT
[#48]

Quoted:
IIRC being issued a CCW means you must ALWAYS present the CCW license even when not CCWing.


This is incorrect (at least here in Texas).  If I am a CHL holder, but am not currently armed I do NOT have to provide my CHL to an officer (when asked for ID, when stopped for a traffic violation, etc.)

However, I do it anyway.  Politeness and all.
9/3/2007 12:34:51 PM EDT
[#49]
Just jump over the nearest creek and barb-wire fence and they will think you are from Mexico. They only want to harass John Doe.... but not "Julio Hernandez Juan Guatamala Velenquez Carlos Valdez".
9/3/2007 12:37:11 PM EDT
[#50]

Quoted:
FWIW; Drivers license in most states is the property of the state.

And if I'm not driving and don't have it on my person they can come to my house and retrieve it.

Arresting me will take longer to get it if that's what they're after.

Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.