Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
4/10/2007 6:44:56 PM EDT
I was thinking about this.
If I was to hire two people to have sex in front of me, while I masturbated, that would be prostitution and illegal.
If I videotape it, and sell it for people to masturbate to, it is pornography and legal.

The way I see it, money is changing hands for sex, therefore the two are one and the same.
Logically, both should share the same legal status.
4/10/2007 6:45:56 PM EDT
[#1]
the difference is, in prostitution, one person is paying another for sex, while in porn, a third party pays both to have sex.
4/10/2007 6:46:09 PM EDT
[#2]
If porn was illegal AR15 wouldn't have as many members as it would now. Unless they allowed posting in prison j/k
4/10/2007 6:47:10 PM EDT
[#3]
An age old question, for an age old profession.

I say no, becuase like a peep show, you're not makeing physical, sexual contact with "actor".
4/10/2007 6:47:15 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
the difference is, in prostitution, one person is paying another for sex, while in porn, a third party pays both to have sex.


What if I pay to watch someone else masterbate....on video. Or off video.

Are fetish films with no nudity or penetration considered porn?

4/10/2007 6:48:22 PM EDT
[#5]
its easier to TAX the porn industry professionals compared to the street entrepreneurs
4/10/2007 6:49:13 PM EDT
[#6]
Cut out the middle man - bang your own prostitute, film it, sell it and jerk off to it.
4/10/2007 6:49:22 PM EDT
[#7]
Both are sins in the eyes of Allah.
4/10/2007 6:50:20 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
its easier to TAX the porn industry professionals compared to the street entrepreneurs


CORRECT.

Also, depends on what your definition of the word "is" is.
4/10/2007 6:50:22 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
Both are sins in the eyes of Allah.


4/10/2007 6:51:32 PM EDT
[#10]
They're sins in the eyes of God too
4/10/2007 6:53:13 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
They're sins in the eyes of God too


Jesus hung out with prostitutes and drunks.
4/10/2007 6:53:17 PM EDT
[#12]
I don't pay anybody for third party sex. It's all free and on the internet.
4/10/2007 6:55:04 PM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
Cut out the middle man - bang your own prostitute, film it, sell it and jerk off to it.


btdt
4/10/2007 6:56:06 PM EDT
[#14]
Nah, thats a stretch my friend. I like porn!
4/10/2007 6:57:23 PM EDT
[#15]
No more so than marriage is.
4/10/2007 7:00:22 PM EDT
[#16]
Oh heres a good one:

What if you tape you and your wife having sex and then pleasure yourself to it - is that prostitution? Is it if you sell to friends? Is it if you give it to friends for free? Is it if your friends steal it from your safe?
4/10/2007 7:08:43 PM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:

Quoted:
They're sins in the eyes of God too


Jesus hung out with prostitutes and drunks.


That doesn’t mean he condoned their actions.
4/10/2007 7:12:08 PM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:

Quoted:
They're sins in the eyes of God too


Jesus hung out with prostitutes and drunks.


But he never paid them for a boning or purchased them any beer...
4/10/2007 7:15:00 PM EDT
[#19]
I totally know - just stirring the shit.
4/10/2007 7:19:22 PM EDT
[#20]
Porn actors are not paid for having sex.  They are paid for signing the release of the commercial use of their images.
4/10/2007 7:22:29 PM EDT
[#21]
It's prostitution regardless of wether the person paying is having sex with the people he is paying to have sex or not.

Now if he is paying people to perform and act like they are having sex as part of a movie then no.  It is protected under the first ammendment.

Same thing if you hire an actress to perform in a movie with yourself.  Perfectly legal.

I've said it before and I'll say it again:

Amazing how many people here will so fervently stand up for their 2nd amendment rights and then will turn around and support suppressing the rest of them.
4/10/2007 7:23:14 PM EDT
[#22]
No
4/10/2007 7:24:47 PM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
They're sins in the eyes of God too


Jesus hung out with prostitutes and drunks.


But he never paid them for a boning or purchased them any beer...


Nope he just made the wine...
4/10/2007 7:26:07 PM EDT
[#24]
It's a can o' worms.....
4/10/2007 7:27:29 PM EDT
[#25]
I guess it would depend on how you define prostitution.

Is it a monetary transaction on a personal level, as in 2 people on the street?

Or just money for sex in general, as in I paid for a magazine in which there are pictures of 2 other people having sex?

If the latter is the case, then I suppose even "free" internet pron is prostitution since someone is paying the woman for sex, just not me.

I don't consider it prostitution unless there is a personal transaction between 2 people. Although in theory I see your point.

And I refuse to beleive me looking at internet pron is "hiring a hooker".
4/10/2007 7:28:40 PM EDT
[#26]
Prostitution is legal in Canada. Communicating for the pruposes of prostitution is not.


ETA: I have hired the second page to be my bitch!
4/10/2007 7:41:36 PM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:
Porn actors are not paid for having sex.  They are paid for signing the release of the commercial use of their images.


Exactly right.

-Troy
4/10/2007 7:47:25 PM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:

Quoted:
the difference is, in prostitution, one person is paying another for sex, while in porn, a third party pays both to have sex.


What if I pay to watch someone else masterbate....on video. Or off video.

Are fetish films with no nudity or penetration considered porn?



Most blue laws will describe porn as any material "appealing to prurient interests", meaning if it's intended to give someone a woody, then it's porn.

There was a federal case in Utah recently where two guys got arrested for their website showing pics of underage girls in bikinis and swimsuits.  Even though there was no nudity they got convicted for kiddie porn because the girls were all doing suggestive poses.
4/10/2007 7:58:26 PM EDT
[#29]
Laws vary from state to state.   Florida laws don't make it illegal for someone to pay for another person to masturbate or watch them masturbate.     As long as there is no sexual contact between the two people and it's all just watching,  it's not illegal.
 

Nor is it illegal for you to pay to watch others have sex or pay for them to watch you have sex with someone that you're NOT paying.

No sexual contact between the people who exchange money.    That pretty much sums it up in Florida.

I disagree with most laws against prostitution.     If I ran the zoo,   only the streetwalking side of the business would still be illegal.    Outcall, incall, and brothel activity would be legal, but taxed and regulated and with stringent requirements concerning the health and
safety of the workers and the public.    Frequent testing for STDs and drugs would be
mandatory for all the workers.   Those records would be available for public inspection but
the inspectable copies would not have the right names of the workers on them.  Just an
identification number that is referenced in private copies.

I can't see why it's such a bad thing to give another person an orgasm, even if money does change hands to make it happen.    How is that really any different from a regular
date where you pick up the tab?    Except that that's STILL no guarantee you're getting any!




CJ
4/10/2007 8:04:18 PM EDT
[#30]

Quoted:
its easier to TAX the porn industry professionals compared to the street entrepreneurs


I disagree.  Most of Nevada seems to tax it just fine.
4/10/2007 8:05:16 PM EDT
[#31]
Legally, the answer to the question posed by the thread title is "depends on the state".  California for example wrote a law to exempt porn production from prostitution statutes after some prosecutions (in the 70's IIRC).  I would suspect that many or most states would be able to sustain prosecutions under prostitution statutes.

Morally/ethically, I would say "yes".
4/10/2007 8:07:04 PM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:
I guess it would depend on how you define prostitution.

Is it a monetary transaction on a personal level, as in 2 people on the street?

Or just money for sex in general, as in I paid for a magazine in which there are pictures of 2 other people having sex?

If the latter is the case, then I suppose even "free" internet pron is prostitution since someone is paying the woman for sex, just not me.

I don't consider it prostitution unless there is a personal transaction between 2 people. Although in theory I see your point.

And I refuse to beleive me looking at internet pron is "hiring a hooker".


Is  there really a difference in what you describe and dating/marriage?
4/10/2007 8:29:58 PM EDT
[#33]

Quoted:

Quoted:
I guess it would depend on how you define prostitution.

Is it a monetary transaction on a personal level, as in 2 people on the street?

Or just money for sex in general, as in I paid for a magazine in which there are pictures of 2 other people having sex?

If the latter is the case, then I suppose even "free" internet pron is prostitution since someone is paying the woman for sex, just not me.

I don't consider it prostitution unless there is a personal transaction between 2 people. Although in theory I see your point.

And I refuse to beleive me looking at internet pron is "hiring a hooker".


Is  there really a difference in what you describe and dating/marriage?


I suppose so since I've never given cash (or services) for a date or a bride.
4/10/2007 8:43:12 PM EDT
[#34]
If you want to fuck a prostitute, get a camera.

BAM its not prostitution, its porn and legal.

Just goes to show how stupid the laws are.

Prostitution should be legal and regulated for public health concerns.
4/10/2007 8:46:49 PM EDT
[#35]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
They're sins in the eyes of God too


Jesus hung out with prostitutes and drunks.


But he never paid them for a boning or purchased them any beer...


Nope he just made the wine...


The Bible makes a clear distinction between 'drinking alcohol' and 'being/getting drunk'...
4/10/2007 8:54:34 PM EDT
[#36]

Quoted:

Quoted:
its easier to TAX the porn industry professionals compared to the street entrepreneurs


I disagree.  Most of Nevada seems to tax it just fine.


The counties in Nevada where prostitution is legal only allows it in licensed brothels.  Streetwalkers are not allowed.

However, due to the AIDS problems in Australia, prostitution was legalized with the following restrictions:

- You either have to work in a licensed brothel, or
- You can be a "sole proprieter".

No pimps running stables of 'hos.

In both cases, sex workers must be tested for STDs at least every 30 days, and of course, must file and pay taxes on their income.

This has resulted in a drastic reduction in streetwalkers, violence against prostitutes, and STD transmissions in Australia.  Much like CCWs didn't lead to "blood in the streets" and "shootouts on every corner", legalizing prostitution has significantly REDUCED prostitution-related problems.

Once again we learn that the PROHIBITION ENFORCEMENT itself was WORSE than the "problem" that was intended to be eliminated.

If only we can apply that same lesson elsewhere...

-Troy
4/22/2007 5:28:31 PM EDT
[#37]
this thread is completely useless without pics.  
4/22/2007 5:44:26 PM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:
Logically, both should share the same legal status.


Correct, both should be legal with very few restrictions.

Re: Consenting Adults, Freedom, Free Enterprise.
7/12/2007 5:40:22 PM EDT
[#39]

Quoted:

Quoted:
They're sins in the eyes of God too


Jesus hung out with prostitutes and drunks.


and showed them that what they were doing was wrong
7/13/2007 7:10:16 AM EDT
[#40]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
I guess it would depend on how you define prostitution.

Is it a monetary transaction on a personal level, as in 2 people on the street?

Or just money for sex in general, as in I paid for a magazine in which there are pictures of 2 other people having sex?

If the latter is the case, then I suppose even "free" internet pron is prostitution since someone is paying the woman for sex, just not me.

I don't consider it prostitution unless there is a personal transaction between 2 people. Although in theory I see your point.

And I refuse to beleive me looking at internet pron is "hiring a hooker".


Is  there really a difference in what you describe and dating/marriage?


I suppose so since I've never given cash (or services) for a date or a bride.


Most likely you are like me in that we didn't directly/explicitly do such a thing for a date.  But indirectly/implicitly...?  At some point I think we almost all indirectly pay for it.  
7/13/2007 7:33:41 AM EDT
[#41]

Quoted:
It's prostitution regardless of wether the person paying is having sex with the people he is paying to have sex or not.


And should be LEGAL in places where people are FREE to make their own decisions and at LIBERTY to suffer their own consequences.
7/13/2007 7:36:22 AM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:
They're sins in the eyes of God too


And Gary Sinise, too.
7/13/2007 7:43:50 AM EDT
[#43]
So if I have a "friend" "pay" me and a prostitute to have sex, would that would be OK?
7/13/2007 8:11:06 AM EDT
[#44]
In 1988, an L.A. prosecutor decided to bust a porn company using prostitution laws.  The People vs. Freeman eventually wound up in the California Supreme Court, which ruled that prostitution laws did not apply to commercial pornography productions, at least, not in the PRK.

But in order to have any REAL protection, you'd probably need to have some evidence that you were in business to create and distribute your works.  And you'd definitely need to have all of your 18 U.S.C. 2257 documentation in order.

Some random dude paying some chick for sex isn't going to be protected, with or without a camera, without some additional documentation.

-Troy
7/13/2007 11:02:30 AM EDT
[#45]
About that free internet porn that several have mentioned.  Be sure and use protection


Industry Organization Formed to Combat Content Piracy
By Joanne Cachapero
Tuesday, July 10, 2007     Adjust font size:


LOS ANGELES —Adult industry members have announced formation of the Global Anti-Piracy Agency, a nonprofit trade organization dedicated to combating content theft, from illegally downloaded Internet content to illegally reproduced DVDs. Initial funding for GAPA has been provided by Sureflix Digital Distribution, Inc., parent company of gay distribution network Maleflixxx.

“This is really in recognition of a problem that everyone is aware of and is affecting everyone in the industry,” GAPA Interim Executive Director Caryn Goldberg told XBIZ.

GAPA estimates that illegal downloading, file-sharing and other forms of piracy are costing adult industry producers, distributors, retailers, cable operators, VOD and mobile providers nearly $2 billion a year in lost revenue.

“We’re not talking so much about a guy that downloads a couple of videos illegally, although that is a problem. It’s all the file-sharing services. Look what the recording industry did to Napster. It’s these gross infringements, like file-sharing and BitTorrent.” said Goldberg.

GAPA has defined its goals as identifying and stopping theft of intellectual property whenever possible, as well as lobbying governmental bodies to create, strengthen and uphold content piracy laws. The organization also will actively seek to educate industry members and the public on issues concerning intellectual property theft.

“Look at what the recording industry and the mainstream movie industry have done by just mobilizing task forces and organizations through their main trade organizations, to fight piracy as much as possible,” Goldberg said. “Every once in a while, you hear about big cases bringing down at least the major infringers.”

The organization was founded in June after Sureflix Digital Distribution Inc. President Eric Johnson approached Goldberg and supplied start-up funding for the nonprofit. The organization will seek further funding from memberships fees, donations and other sources.

“Sureflix is committed to providing initial and ongoing support to enable the long-term survival of the organization,” Johnson said. We’re looking to members of the adult industry for organizational and financial support to ensure that GAPA becomes an effective and independent organization. Towards that end, we’ve appointed Caryn Goldberg, a well-respected leader in the adult entertainment industry, as interim executive director.”.

Goldberg was formerly president and publisher at SpecPub Inc., a producer of gay adult entertainment publications and websites. Prior to her career in the adult industry, she had 10 years of experience in nonprofit management and fund-raising.

Incorporated just two weeks ago, the organization has filed for nonprofit status and is looking for office space in the Los Angeles area. Goldberg currently is running a one-woman operation and is looking to staff up within the next few weeks.

“This organization is dedicated to the industry as a whole,” Goldberg said. “We’re here and I’d say that we’ll be in full operation by September. That’s when you’ll really see some action from us.”
 
7/13/2007 11:12:21 AM EDT
[#46]
If you get a check to have sex then it is prostitution.

If the check bounces then it is rape.

All of your Page 3 are belong to us.
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page