Posted: 4/10/2007 10:05:49 AM EDT
| I personally know people whos lives have been saved by the MICH helmets and I know that the army will be fielding a nape protector that attaches to the helmets retention system. I agree the cut seems to pretty generously leave areas open and I dont see why they didnt just revamp the PASGT series |
| I tell you what. Put on a PASGT helmet and a full IBA and then assume a prone unsupported firing position. You'll understand instantly why that material is "missing" at the back. If the officer wearing the ACH/MICH were also wearing his IBA it would be more apparent. As was already said, there is a nape pad coming very soon to help fill that space, but the soft armor won't stop a rifle round anyway (neither will the helmet). |
+1-this was a problem that went back to the original PASGT vest & helmet combo; the PASGT vest "collar" would push the helmet down your forehead and block your sight. |
While the IBA interference is the reason the cut of the helmet was changed, you are WRONG about the penetration. The MICH is rated to stop 7.62x39 at 100 yds. That is half the reason for the pads, they distribute the force of the round across the surface of the skull and helps to dissipate the energy of the round. Will you be a happy camper? No. But you will live and probably even get to pop one into the SOB who shot you in the head. |
I didn't know that. The SOF guys told me it was rated exactly the same as the old PASGT. Either way, most of the snipers here are using 7.62X54R anyway. It's always better than nothing. |
There is a PASGT helmet in the 82nd Airborne Division Museum with a 7.62x39mm round embedded in it. Not a rumor. Of course, there are also coonfirmed situations where a M1 steel helmet save its wearer from a German 7.92mm in WWII (angle, angle, angle!). |
